Hot bridge pickup, parallel in the neck?

[gamb]

I'm looking to replace the stock pickups on my Les Paul copy, and since I mostly use the bridge pickup I was thinking about going a little experimental for the neck.
My first thought was a Super Distortion in the bridge and a humbucker-sized P-90 in the neck, but I've got an idea now and I need to know if it's the good kind of crazy or the bad kind of crazy: putting a Seymour Duncan JB in the bridge (wired in series as traditional) and then another identical JB in the neck, wired in Parallel to quiet it down a bit.
Will it still have too much output in the neck, even wired in parallel?
Has anyone tried this, putting a bridge pickup in parallel in the neck?

[Demanic]

Try doing that with a Distortion set.
Anytime you wire a pickup parallel, you accentuate the highs and subdue the mids.

Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk

[gamb]

Try doing that with a Distortion set.
Anytime you wire a pickup parallel, you accentuate the highs and subdue the mids.

That's good to know! Last thing I want to do on a JB is accentuate the highs. Sounds like a Super D might be the prime candidate for something like that

[Demanic]

I have a Schecter with a JB in the bridge that splits the pickup in position 4. It sounds great that way. And I can only imagine that it would sound good in the neck. But if you want to use an SD, more power to you.

Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk

[Mincer]

A JB in parallel is actually a great sound. If you decide to do this, let us know how it turns out.

[ErikH]

My Dean ML is like this with dual Super Distortions. That pickup is great in parallel.

[Clint 55]

It will balance. Should be cool, report back!