1954 Charvel...

Re: 1954 Charvel...

you need an artist relations division. And no, I won't be a part of it.

I thnk that is the best relic'ing I've seen except nobody playing a strat back far enough to make it real would have the guitar hanging that low as to have the buckle rash that high, but whatever! Looks like a sweet machine! As do the rest of the guitars on your site!
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

xthumbsup.jpg
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

supernosher...most of the artists that play my Clone's and other creations i've sold post here lol. there's your relations hahaha. thanks for the kind words on the relic work. as for the buckle rash, like i mentioned that's real deal buckle rash done with my belt buckle right where the guitar hits my belt at the height i play it at and where it hits when i tilt the guitar to do a solo and stuff like that...the wear is a bit over thought out like that to make it a bit more real to me. most guys just randomly beat on the guitars and take sandpaper to them, i thought through it and tried to make it as if i played this guitar to the condition it's in now. there's some real nice gouging going on in the back that's not evident in the pics, using a real belt buckle to do it made sure it wasn't all pretty and smooth wear like when it's done with sandpaper. same with the fore arm wear it's worn where i would wear it over many years...just done in one afternoon not years lol. the other little bumps and bruises are random just as they happen in real life with a few though out ones like the scratch from an allen key under the string lock screws on the floyd as if someone slipped when changing a string and scratched it there.

Ayrton...thanks bro!!

-Mike
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

One of these days I need to have you build me a guitar, just so I can say I have one.

Nice work as always.
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Those tuners are nice, thought they might have had some wear just could not really tell from the pics. I didn't mean rusted when I said aged, just with some plating dulled or worn off. It's really cool!

Thanks for the info on the trem arms, never noticed or knew that!
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

what about teeth marks on the pickguard like hendrix played it! and lighter fluid residue!
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Now, as you know, I'm not a huge fan of relics at all, but man, that one looks really really nice. Nice work, Mike.

I'm with Christian and the others that say a little checking. Just a little, not a lot. For the neck, maybe wipe on a thin layer of lighly amber dyed oil to give it that aged look.

I'm with ya on the HS config. I recently made the Maiden Strat HS, though the neck pickups is the Air Norton S. I'm using the black guard that came on the silver body. PAF Pro is in the bridge. Talk about a killer sounding guitar.
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

For the neck, maybe wipe on a thin layer of lighly amber dyed oil to give it that aged look.

Oh man, don't do that! Artificially yellowed necks ALWAYS look gross, and not the dirty-from-playing-it, good kind of gross :)
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Oh man, don't do that! Artificially yellowed necks ALWAYS look gross, and not the dirty-from-playing-it, good kind of gross :)

That's why I said "thin" and "lightly". That'll avoid it looking fake.

You should see the aging of the color on my Warmoth neck that I bought in 1993. It would look killer on a relic body but my Frankenstrat is naturally relic'd from playing it so much. :)
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Your new relic kick looks really "Mad Max," kind of post-apocalyptic.

In a world where guitars are built for function out of whatever's laying around

Very nice relic job, I appreciate the thought you put into it.
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

I like the relic job on this one way more than the last one. It just looks more 'natural'. As for checking, I'd just not baby it and let it happen on its own. Cool looking guitar though. As usual.
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

001954 is the lucky serial number bonus i got when i bought one of the new Charvel production model tele's to use the neck and neckplate for a relic project. i looked high and low for one of the teles that didn't have that horrible over the top neck roll my first production model had and this one was it. the perfect amount of roll, a nice grain pattern which even has some subtle flame to it. after i did the frets on it and reshaped a few things it plays like butter! it was very fitting that the neck and plate were being used on a 2 tone burst relic strat body being that (if you haven't got it yet) 1954 is the first production year of the strat. anyway, fun bonus numbers aside here's my latest creation and the guitar that instantly became my #1 guitar after 5 minutes of playing it. i took the mentioned charvel tele (you'll have to wait to see what i turn that body into) and since putting a strat headstock on a tele body is like having sex with your cousin...sure the parts fit but it doesn't mean it's a good idea to do it...i used the neck in a much better way combining it with one of my Clone bodies painted by my friend Cris Mirabella in a great 2 tone burst over some nice resonant 2pc alder. after i spent a ton of time buffing out the body to a perfect shine i beat the living hell out of it. for my first venture at doing relic work i think i did pretty good. plus i didn't use ANY sandpaper to do the relicing, i did it in the most realistic ways i could think of. the belt rash...i did with my belt buckle, the fore arm wear...no sandpaper here, high speed buffing wheel with a wool pad and some heavy duty compound wore it in a smooth and even way just like an arm would after man years. the rest of it was just hitting the guitar into things and throwing things at it LOL. as for the dirty neck, i may make it dirtier but it looks even better in person so it may stay. i also still need to decide if i want to finish check it or not and add a matching Marilyn Monroe pinup to the back like my other 2 tone burst Clone #013 which isn't a relic. as for hardware...real charvel brass knob, repro strap buttons, some gotoh crownheads from the charvel era (although they never used crownheads on 22 fret necks as far as i know they still look cool on it so i went with them.) a floyd from the 80s with just the right amount of pitting an wear. for pickups it has a Custom 5 in the bridge which is also aged but it's hard to tell in the pics. the neck pickup is a dimarzio area 61 which i'm really digging so far, a great hollow stratty tone that works real well clean and under high gain which is what i do most. anyway enough babble here are the pics...

so do i finish check it or call it done as is??? your thoughts?

relic1.jpg


relic2.jpg


relic3.jpg


relic4.jpg


relic5.jpg


relic6.jpg


the cool bonus 1954 serial number....
relic7.jpg


-Mike

man that thing has got a FAT floyd block:eyecrazy:
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

You know Mike I was thinking about that guitar on the way home Saturday, and If it were mine I would probably put in a 2nd volume with a 250K pot for the neck pup, and leave the other pot for the bridge. Then maybe a tone control. I don't think it needs it, but it would be cool. Yeah I know you are a one knob kind of guy. That would take some of the brightness of the Neck PUP away with the 250K. All in all I was impressed with the Neck pickup.
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Ayrton...let me know i may consider it if i find time.

gOgIver...yeah the tuners do have wear they are what was used on the original charvels back in the late 70s early 80s until they switched to 22 fret necks. so having a set on a 22 fret charvel is a bit odd for the screw counters but i like them and that's all that matters LOL.

supernosher...teeth marks??? nah i'm not a biter lol.

BTMN....thank you!

ErikH...thanks man! nah, no amber it will age on it's own as it gets dirt and seat over the years. for now it's dirty enough to balance visually with the body. the hum single set up is where it's at for sure!!

lpmarshall...lol thanks!

HotSEXJ...thanks man, i'm cool with the mad max idea since that's pretty much the vibe i wanted, the modded and well played trusty old strat.

3'scompany...thanks for the kind words on the relic work! unlike the last one i can take full credit for the relic work on this one and it's addicting and i want to do more relics in the future!!!

Christopher Caruana...yup bigh high mass brass block is where it's at for a nice big tone!

Dave...ahhh so it is that good, it had you thinking about it on the drive home after playing it...my job here is done hahahaha. the two volume idea could certainly work but like you said i'm a big fan of 1 knob and that's it. i could try the mod that drops the 500k down to 250k when the neck pickup is selected but there already is a bit of a volume drop from neck to middle (not that i mind since it's not noticable under high gain, only clean) so doing that would make it worse. plus like i mentioned i like a bright neck pickup hence my love of a strat neck pickup over that of a les paul which is overly muddy in most cases for me. also through my rig it sounds much different than through your amp at the shop. i'm happy with it though, that's for sure!! i do still have an itch to do a real strat with 3 knobs and 3 singles like i mentioned though...down the road i'll do that i think.

-Mike
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

dude.....WOW.

that is amazing.....amazing. so classy. this relic job is perfect...absolutely....stunning.


i'm struck with awe
 
Re: 1954 Charvel...

Ayrton...let me know i may consider it if i find time.



-Mike

Consider it??? Oh you will do what I want, when I want it. :D

Perhaps next year after I finished my PGMs, the Iceman, my Tele, and have finally gotten my N4s sorted. :banghead:
 
Back
Top