1964 Fender Pro

Gunny47

New member
*You may skip the first few paragraphs, basically say that I am really considering a vintage amp because of the few magical times I've played them*
- look for other stars for where to start or read it all

At the music school I go to now, I've been using a 1967 Blackface Twin Reverb. I am not sure how original the amp is, but I think one of the speakers are newer and I know the tubes have been changed recently for Groove Tubes. I have been bringing my new Keeley TS9 to practices to use with this Twin Reverb and my R7 and the tones are just blowing me away. Clean tones are perfect, I can get some awesome drive tones as well. The vintage amp just is, you know, VINTAGE! It breathes, really has a ton of character, just sounds better than any reissue or newer amp I've ever played. The only amp I've liked better is a blackface Pro Reverb which was my favorite tone I've ever gotten. Other vintage amp experiences I've gone through included a brownface Deluxe a teacher had at my music school (which gave me this ultra fat lead tones even with my R7 and '62 American Reissue strat, took pedals amazingly as well), a 1953 Tweed Deluxe w/ a Murphy R9 and an Blackface Fender Concert with newer ceramic Jensen reissue speakers with a white strat of some sort and my R7 (another dude's gear from my music school).

Basically, all these vintage amp experiences have been so incredibly awesome and magical and makes me want to get a vintage amp. I've been gassing for a blackface amp since I first started looking for a tube amp, but then put it off for my little Gibson GA5 and then the more raunchy Tweed Twin, which I am still in love with. Only thing is that I like my R7 more than my Tweed Twin respectively so I'm thinking amp instead of plunging for another guitar. And besides, I am not the biggest fan of older or vintage guitars from my experiences. Plus, the one's I am interested in are crazy expensive and totally out of my range (I'm a LP, ES-335, and a little bit strat and SG guy, forget about getting decent vintage counterparts of those without selling your house).

I did a bit of looking around over the last week and decided to go with blackface just becasue my main influences used those amps (Freddie King, Derek Trucks, SRV etc) and because I like Fenders the best, and already have a tweed and desire that blackface tone. I looked at early silverface amps especially, the ones which were very similar to their blackface counterparts besides color, and I could always send them to a tech and get them blackfaced. I wanted an amp I could gig with that had plenty of headroom and I could get lower gain tones with a Tube Screamer. But with all of the silverface amps out there as bargains, I discovered another bargain "era..."

*Probably could start here*

Blackface NON reverb amps. Vibroverbs, which was the main amp I had in mind as well as Super Reverbs, go for from what I saw $3800 all the way up to $7500. Big money, forget it. However, the 1964 counterpart, the Fender Pro, I found a few that go for less than half of the lowest price of Vibroverbs. I did some research on the model, and they're pretty much the same exact thing as Vibroverbs except without the reverb. I never use the reverb when I play the 67 Twin and if I REALLY REALLY want some reverb, I could buy a reissue Reverb unit or even a vintage reverb unit and still have a TON of cash left over. Still not too crazy about reverb, I won't miss it all being a 50s style amp guy at the moment.

These Fender Pros I've found were pretty much all original besides a couple of caps (which I would swap out anyway) and were very clean. I also found the Concert and the Super Reverb to be the same story, Concert not having reverb but being a ton less. I'm more attracted to the 1x15 speaker config for sonic reasons and according to the weight of the reissues, the Vibroverb weighs about 13 pounds less than the Super Reverb. I'll still invest in a road case with wheels so I can wheel it onstage and wheel it back when I'm done. So heres the big questions....especially for you old Fender amp gurus out there. What do you think about these non reverb blackface amps, especially the 1X15 Pro? What tech work would be expected on one as soon as I get it? I am guessing caps and tubes and such. And also, I am looking for a very dependable tech in the NYC area that could hook me up and make this amp perform its best. I really do not want to perform any extensive mods on the amp, I want to keep it sounding original and just fix the parts that need to be fixed. So any recomendations/advice will be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much, bros!
 
Last edited:
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

BF NON Reverb amps do not have the gain, punch, or balls of their reverb counterparts...they are cheep for a reason!!! The reverb versions sound FAR better, IMO even if you don't ever use the reverb...
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

i agree with christian. While the non-reverb versions do not sound bad at all (though im not a tone hound), the reverb versions definately have more punch and authority to them, regardless if you want to use the reverb or not. I'd definately go with an early SF amp.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

A little stashed for time at the moment... but in the greater NYC area you probably wanna look up Matt Wells or Bruno for maintance stuff...

The crew over at 30th Street Guitars is HIGHLY worth talking to as well!!!
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

BF NON Reverb amps do not have the gain, punch, or balls of their reverb counterparts...they are cheep for a reason!!! The reverb versions sound FAR better, IMO even if you don't ever use the reverb...

The tube that drives the verb has a lot to do with as you well know. I'm not an amp tech and don't know how it all works, but the bottom line is go for the reverb amp. There was a recent post here.... I think Lew started it about Pro Reverbs being a relative bargain. I agree. But for the money I would go with a silver face and if necessary have it blackfaced. I say IF NECESSARY, because many NON MASTER VOLUME silvers sound as good and in some cases better than a blackface and they are a lot cheaper.
here: https://forum.seymourduncan.com/showthread.php?t=114127
 
Last edited:
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

I've been looking around for old Pro Reverbs too, and keep running into silverface versions. I'm almost tempted to grab one, see if I like it the way it is, and if not, have it blackfaced.

But also, if you don't want all the maintenance, there's a lot of handwired Fender clones out there that are awesome. They may not have the historical mojo, but I'd take most Divided/13's and Tone Kings over a 60's Fender.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

I've been looking around for old Pro Reverbs too, and keep running into silverface versions. I'm almost tempted to grab one, see if I like it the way it is, and if not, have it blackfaced.

But also, if you don't want all the maintenance, there's a lot of handwired Fender clones out there that are awesome. They may not have the historical mojo, but I'd take most Divided/13's and Tone Kings over a 60's Fender.

The thing is that he's talking abot a 1x15 Pro NON Reverb...those are not as nice an amp as a Pro Reverb. There are several 68 and 69 Pro Reverbs out there that are just as good as a mid 60's Blackface for 1/3 or less the price of said mid 60's BF...
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

I had an old 66 Super Reverb, I wish I had back. But I really wish I hadn't sold 2 of the 4 Blues Pearls I had in the late 90's.

For the past several years, I've been primarily into strats and pauls into British amps, but I'm jonesing for the Blackface sound again. I've even been considering the Custom Shop 64 Vibroverb, just because I liked it in the store the few times I've demoed it. The 15 inch speaker gives it some balls on the low notes.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

I had an old 66 Super Reverb, I wish I had back. But I really wish I hadn't sold 2 of the 4 Blues Pearls I had in the late 90's.
For the past several years, I've been primarily into strats and pauls into British amps, but I'm jonesing for the Blackface sound again. I've even been considering the Custom Shop 64 Vibroverb, just because I liked it in the store the few times I've demoed it. The 15 inch speaker gives it some balls on the low notes.

Im helping a fellow forum bro do a DIY Vibroverb clone...late 60's Bandmaster reverb chassis, custom built 1x15 cab with floating plywood baffle and a Weber Cali 15 and you've got less than a grand in an amp that will stomp a CS 64 Vibroverb reissue in the DIRT quick!!!

BF Fenders are cool but I just can't play thorugh them for long in their stock form, it's a sound I grow tired of...my old Twin Reverb is a great amp I'll never sell it but it will never be my main amp.

Also, IMO many of the boutique BF style amps just don't cut it...I remember playing a Bruno BF Style amp right next to a 66 BF Pro Reverb. The Burno was 3k, the Pro Reverb was 2k and IMO the Pro wiped the floor up with the Bruno...the Pro was just an all around better amp...better cleans, better more natural sounding OD, great strong tremolo, MUCH better reverb...even the 40+ year Jensen speakers sounded better!!!

There are a load of guys out there doing various copies of various Fenders...tweeds, brownface, blackface, etc and VERY FEW of them really capture the full on tone of a real Fender and even less of them are able to improve on that Fender tone W/O loosing something and W/O messing it up!!!

My advise to ANYONE that wants a classic Fender amp, and even more so if you;re looking for a BF style Fender tone...get an early SF and spend the time and money to make it right and you'll enjoy it for years!
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

yea I decided against the NON reverb '64 Pro. I don't want an amp lacking in balls according to some very experienced people in the old fender field. Now, I was debating between doing a Vibroclone similar to what another forum bro was doing and a Pro Reverb. I think I am leaning towards the Pro Reverb, which is like the "low power twin" of the blackface era. I like the 2x12s better from the little I've experienced with 1x15s. I will have this amp by the end of summer when I finish work and after my birthday comes. And one day when I find some time I am going to go to the city and play all the vintage fenders I could.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

If you end up looking for a Pro reverb (great amps by the way, ask Mike fuller...thats what he uses for a clean tone!) look hard and get a clean 68 or 69 model Silverface...it's the SAME amp as a 64-67 BF but with a different face and grill cloth and the price will be close to half!!!
 
Last edited:
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

Will do captain! I've been bookmarking all of the ones that seem good. The one you showed me for $1200 ('68) looked pretty cool, it's not in the shape I really want though, so I'll keep looking. I'm going to make some phone calls this week about them , maybe put a couple on hold if I don't have to put any money down. Then check some more out this weekend in person down the city.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

Will do captain! I've been bookmarking all of the ones that seem good. The one you showed me for $1200 ('68) looked pretty cool, it's not in the shape I really want though, so I'll keep looking. I'm going to make some phone calls this week about them , maybe put a couple on hold if I don't have to put any money down. Then check some more out this weekend in person down the city.

Forget the condition...a good amp is a good amp even if it's beat up!!!
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

Well, I LOVE when the grill cloth is TRASHED!! The only thing that turns me off to tell you the truth, about that amp, is when the SILVERFACE panel is all oxidated and beat up. I think THAT is ugly, so just to make myself feel better, I might put a blackface panel on that mofo...
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

Well, I LOVE when the grill cloth is TRASHED!! The only thing that turns me off to tell you the truth, about that amp, is when the SILVERFACE panel is all oxidated and beat up. I think THAT is ugly, so just to make myself feel better, I might put a blackface panel on that mofo...

I hear ya but I'll tell you this...a 1968 Pro Reverb is a hella sweet amp and $1200 is a great price for sure an amp beat up or not!!!
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

The Pro Blackface non-reverb amps have better gain then the reverb circuit amps,due to on less restriction in the circuit and to my ear the sound much nicer tone and have a sweet type of gain structure that just gives it the old tweed sounds,and you can jumper both channel,s and they will be in phase and will not cancel each other out for more tone versatility.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

You'll need the electrolytics replaced, not just the filters but the bias filter and the cathode bypass caps.

You'll probably also need new tubes. That stuff is general maintenance for any amp more than 10 years old but most people blow it off for as long as they can and their amps don't sound nearly as good as they should because of it, and are also just waiting for a catastrophic failure.

Reverb versions get the extra oomph from having an extra tube stage, which functions as the reverb recovery stage. Even though that stage is blocked by a 3.3M resistor, that channel still has significantly more gain than a 2 stage channel.

Normal channel or both channels on a non-reverb amp go like this:

Input Gain stage --- Tone controls/volume ------- Recovery gain stage -----Phase inverter------Power tubes.

Reverb channels go like this: Input Gain stage --- Tone controls/volume ------- Recovery gain stage ----- Reverb split and big-assed series resistor ------- Reverb recovery stage-----Phase inverter------Power tubes.

There is nothing wrong with the 2 staged channels/amps. Cranked they can really sing, I have a '64 Bandmaster that can really rock. But the verb amps, well, have verb, and a little more gain on tap on that channel if you want to overdrive them. They also still have the 2 stage channel, it's the one without verb and trem (and it is easy enough to add that to both channels).

My advice would be, get a Pro Reverb. My favorite of the vintage Fenders.
 
Re: 1964 Fender Pro

You'll need the electrolytics replaced, not just the filters but the bias filter and the cathode bypass caps.

You'll probably also need new tubes. That stuff is general maintenance for any amp more than 10 years old but most people blow it off for as long as they can and their amps don't sound nearly as good as they should because of it, and are also just waiting for a catastrophic failure.

Reverb versions get the extra oomph from having an extra tube stage, which functions as the reverb recovery stage. Even though that stage is blocked by a 3.3M resistor, that channel still has significantly more gain than a 2 stage channel.

Normal channel or both channels on a non-reverb amp go like this:

Input Gain stage --- Tone controls/volume ------- Recovery gain stage -----Phase inverter------Power tubes.

Reverb channels go like this: Input Gain stage --- Tone controls/volume ------- Recovery gain stage ----- Reverb split and big-assed series resistor ------- Reverb recovery stage-----Phase inverter------Power tubes.

There is nothing wrong with the 2 staged channels/amps. Cranked they can really sing, I have a '64 Bandmaster that can really rock. But the verb amps, well, have verb, and a little more gain on tap on that channel if you want to overdrive them. They also still have the 2 stage channel, it's the one without verb and trem (and it is easy enough to add that to both channels).

My advice would be, get a Pro Reverb. My favorite of the vintage Fenders.

this thread is five years old dude


-
 
Back
Top