1st Les Paul in hands... what can you tell me about it?

alex1fly

Well-known member
As a piggyback to my "first lp" thread, I picked up this one used over the weekend. Price was right, guitar is solid, seemed like a good place to start. From what I can tell its a 1992 LP Special so slab body and no maple top. Frets in particular are in amazing shape for a 31 year old guitar, so I wonder if its been refretted or at least been worked on. No idea what the pickups are. I do like the little inserts under the pots, pretty neat. Beyond that is there anything I should know about this axe? Also, any warning signs that it isn't a legit Gibson?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4124.jpg
    IMG_4124.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_4127.jpg
    IMG_4127.jpg
    40.4 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_4126.jpg
    IMG_4126.jpg
    62.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_4125.jpg
    IMG_4125.jpg
    47.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_4123.jpg
    IMG_4123.jpg
    66.6 KB · Views: 0
As a piggyback to my "first lp" thread, I picked up this one used over the weekend. Price was right, guitar is solid, seemed like a good place to start. From what I can tell its a 1992 LP Special so slab body and no maple top. Frets in particular are in amazing shape for a 31 year old guitar, so I wonder if its been refretted or at least been worked on. No idea what the pickups are. I do like the little inserts under the pots, pretty neat. Beyond that is there anything I should know about this axe? Also, any warning signs that it isn't a legit Gibson?

Those Crocs look fake too.
 
Looks like a legit 90s LP Special to me. When you re-string it, just lift the pickups out to see what they are. Looks like a good platform to try out various pickups.
 
Looks like a legit 90s LP Special to me. When you re-string it, just lift the pickups out to see what they are. Looks like a good platform to try out various pickups.
Looks like either 500T, 498T, or 490T. The bridge pickup looks wider-spaced to me, that's what I can tell. I doubt 500T, though.
 
I wouldn't swap the 498T out, personally. At least not immediately.

Unless you're going for something more traditional PAF Les Paul-y sounding.

It is, after all, the same pickup they put in the 6,000 Customs.
 
Last edited:
Looks like either 500T, 498T, or 490T. The bridge pickup looks wider-spaced to me, that's what I can tell. I doubt 500T, though.

Gibson switched to a wider bridge spacing many years ago, but I don't recall the exact year. Might have coincided with the introduction of the Nashville bridge, but don't quote me on that. ICTGoober would likely know.
 
Gibson switched to a wider bridge spacing many years ago, but I don't recall the exact year. Might have coincided with the introduction of the Nashville bridge, but don't quote me on that. ICTGoober would likely know.
Not for all pickups. At least for the current ones (meaning from the 90's and later), I mean.

The PAF-types are still all PAF-spaced. The Burstbuckers, the 57's, the Custombuckers. All standard-spaced. Even the bridge ones.
 
Very cool rock machine. Who cares what the pickups are as long as you dig the tone. The cool thing is if you don't there are so many flavors of Les Paul pickups out there.
 
Links above lead me to believe it features a 490R neck pickup and a 498T bridge pickup. 1998 LP Special "SL" whatever that means
 
Yeah, I don't generally swap out pickups unless I live with them for awhile. But that looks like a cool LP. It is the kind I certainly would go for.
 
Not for all pickups. At least for the current ones (meaning from the 90's and later), I mean.

The PAF-types are still all PAF-spaced. The Burstbuckers, the 57's, the Custombuckers. All standard-spaced. Even the bridge ones.

Right. Standard spacing is typically on Historics or models following 'traiditional' specs.
 
Back
Top