2 EMG Questions

F

fitzyfantastic

New member
Hey guys,
I've finally decided to upgrade my pickups in my Epiphone Goth Flying V. That's a mahogany bodied guitar, by the way. I've already decided on an EMG 81 in the bridge, but I can't decide on a 85 or a 60 in the neck. I play distorted leads in the neck from time to time, and I also want a good clean sound. Judging by this, I think that I'm leaning towards the 85, but your opinions would be very helpful. With the 85, I could opt for the Zakk Wylde set, which brings me to my second question. I have very limited electronical skill. How much would it take putting those in (The ZW set has Quick-Connect wires)?
Thanks very much.
P.S. Hope it isn't a problem that this is the Seymour Duncan Forum...
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

Hello fitzyfantastic,

The 81 leans more to the treble side of the tonal spectrum as does the 60. They also have a more, for lack of a better word, 'modern' sound than that of the 85. IMO, the 81/60 combo is the most compatible pair. If you put an 85 in the neck, you'd have a huge shift in the tonal spectrum to the bassy side. Some like this extreme shift, some don't. Because the EMGs are active, they'll all clean up nicely. As to distortion, again, because the EMGs are active, they work well with any stomp boxes and the like.

I've tried many an EMG combination in many a guitar. If it were me, it would be the 81/60 combo all the way.

As to wiring them up, you MUST use the EMG supplied electronics. You cannot leave the stock stuff in the guitar and have it work properly. if you have limited wiring skills, you might want to have a tech do it. Worst case scenario for an improperly wired EMG: You could explode the battery and blow the pickup's preamp.
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

I've been an authorized EMG tech since they first came on the market, back when you were quite young.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2 EMG Questions

Martian said:
Hello fitzyfantastic,

The 81 leans more to the treble side of the tonal spectrum as does the 60. They also have a more, for lack of a better word, 'modern' sound than that of the 85. IMO, the 81/60 combo is the most compatible pair. If you put an 85 in the neck, you'd have a huge shift in the tonal spectrum to the bassy side. Some like this extreme shift, some don't. Because the EMGs are active, they'll all clean up nicely. As to distortion, again, because the EMGs are active, they work well with any stomp boxes and the like.

I've tried many an EMG combination in many a guitar. If it were me, it would be the 81/60 combo all the way.

As to wiring them up, you MUST use the EMG supplied electronics. You cannot leave the stock stuff in the guitar and have it work properly. if you have limited wiring skills, you might want to have a tech do it. Worst case scenario for an improperly wired EMG: You could explode the battery and blow the pickup's preamp.
Click to expand...

It's funny you mentioned that because I blew a hole in my les paul the other day........My first wiring was the ZW set 81/85 it was a breeze. That set includes all the parts needed. After being comfortable with it for awhile you could run it 18 volts which to my ears makes it sound a little less compressed. Very underated pups alot of people here are really biased because of their loyalty to Seymour Duncan.

For the record I use the 85 in the bridge I like it a tad better than the 81. The 81 also performs great in the neck as well. So the ZW set is a really good option. Great thing about the set is that you could trade the 81 or 85 here for a 60 since they use the quick connects.
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

"The 81 leans more to the treble side of the tonal spectrum as does the 60. They also have a more, for lack of a better word, 'modern' sound than that of the 85. IMO, the 81/60 combo is the most compatible pair. If you put an 85 in the neck, you'd have a huge shift in the tonal spectrum to the bassy side."

Hi I think I might have a little known solution to your solution. I would definately put an 81 in the bridge and:

"I play distorted leads in the neck from time to time, and I also want a good clean sound."

If you like that nice clean and cler "clean tone" and some pretty smoking while at the same time not muddy distorted tone then you might want to put an EMG 58 in the neck. Yes, I said 58. This is an active pickup (it does have the EMG quick-connect wireing system) with that kind of P.A.F. sound with a major and largely desireable twist to it. It has some of those more articulate "stratty" highs and mids giving you a great clean sound and a smoking hot lead sound. It almost sounds like a suped-up P-90 single coil.


Here are a few site where you can get them:

http://guitarpartsdepot.com/Merchan...4d5&LNG=en-US&Screen=CTGY&Category_Code=EMGCS

http://www.musicsolutionsstore.com/index.php?manufacturers_id=265


If you do not like that idea, I have another solution that would be a little more complicated for wiring. (I would always take my guitar to a registered professional; the brands techs if possible; in order to have any works done on my guitars or basses.) I have found a great pickup designer named Bill Lawrence (Please refer to my signature. the website link is also in my signature. You would order your pickup directly from them). He builds a pickup called an L-500. This is a "blade" humbucker that would be great for the needs you have expressed. (I would recommend the Clean or Regular model for you.) Of course, this is a passive pickup, so you would have to get a little more complicated (and costly) installation done.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2 EMG Questions

60 all the way :headbang:
my absolute favorite out of all neck pups. Crushing rhythm sound under high gain .Tight sounding and pretty unique sound when playing leads and it also does great clean tones for things like jazz and so on.
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

Loserchief said:
60 all the way :headbang:
my absolute favorite out of all neck pups. Crushing rhythm sound under high gain .Tight sounding and pretty unique sound when playing leads and it also does great clean tones for things like jazz and so on.
Click to expand...

Loserchief has got it right.
The 60 is the clearest pup for the neck and is never muddy like most neck pups. It's so f**king sparkly and full sounding. Super articulate for leads.
Definitely the finest EMG for the neck. The 58 sounds interesting too but I have not used it yet. :usa1: :usa1: :usa1:
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

OK... I am not going to hijack this thread... just nudge it slightly. :) If I were to put two EMG's in a semi-hollow (es137), which two EMG's would you recommend?
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

"Ransom-

OK... I am not going to hijack this thread... just nudge it slightly. If I were to put two EMG's in a semi-hollow (es137), which two EMG's would you recommend? "

Dual 60's for nice cleans, or 58's. Don't ask for the worlds greatest metal tones out of that tho.

85/60 would work nicely if you wana play harder stuff. You can go from Clean to 80's metal, all the way to death metal with an 85 in the bridge.


And to the original poster... 85 bridge, 60ALINCO neck. Need I say more?
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

Mephis said:
"Ransom-

OK... I am not going to hijack this thread... just nudge it slightly. If I were to put two EMG's in a semi-hollow (es137), which two EMG's would you recommend? "

Dual 60's for nice cleans, or 58's. Don't ask for the worlds greatest metal tones out of that tho.

85/60 would work nicely if you wana play harder stuff. You can go from Clean to 80's metal, all the way to death metal with an 85 in the bridge.
Click to expand...

If an 85 would be the choice for BOTH of these... why not use the 89 to have access to a few more sounds? Would either of these give a "Classic Rock" sound if needed?
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

I've tried a bunch of combinations, but I prefer 81/85 for leads and 81/60 for rhythm.

I like a fat, bassy pup in the neck as it sounds better for legatto type stuff IMO. But sometimes I find the 85 to be a bit too bassy for a great clean tone.

The 60 had a killer clean tone, but it just wasn't doing it for me for leads. It wasn't bad by any means, just not my bag.

I ran an 85/60 set in my LP for awhile and I hated the 85 in the bridge. Too bassy and too rounded. I prefered the 81 for it's more percussive attack and tighter sounding palm mutes.

All this is just my opionion though. You're milage may very according to your amp, technique, and what kinda tone you're after. I'm currently using the 81/85 setup.
 
Re: 2 EMG Questions

screamingdaisy said:
I've tried a bunch of combinations, but I prefer 81/85 for leads and 81/60 for rhythm.

I like a fat, bassy pup in the neck as it sounds better for legatto type stuff IMO. But sometimes I find the 85 to be a bit too bassy for a great clean tone.

The 60 had a killer clean tone, but it just wasn't doing it for me for leads. It wasn't bad by any means, just not my bag.

I ran an 85/60 set in my LP for awhile and I hated the 85 in the bridge. Too bassy and too rounded. I prefered the 81 for it's more percussive attack and tighter sounding palm mutes.

All this is just my opionion though. You're milage may very according to your amp, technique, and what kinda tone you're after. I'm currently using the 81/85 setup.
Click to expand...

How would this be impacted by the semi-hollow makeup of an ES-137?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

80's_Thrash_Metal
Quick EMG wiring question
Replies
12
Views
242
80's_Thrash_Metal
80's_Thrash_Metal
80's_Thrash_Metal
Barrel jack woes.
2
Replies
27
Views
404
ehdwuld
ehdwuld
Archer250
EMGs + Marshalls sound great [80s hair metal content]
Replies
4
Views
140
Archer250
Archer250
G
Help me choose next pickup HSH set.
Replies
6
Views
211
greekdude
G
I
Newbie new build pickup questions for HSS configuration.
2
Replies
29
Views
506
illogical
I
Back
Top