undefinedundefined Can anyone tell me why a 1968 Gibson LP Standard costs more then the 68 Custom I always heard that customs were built with better tonewoods and electronics. New to the vintage game..... :smack:
Well, can't help with the toe jam, but I play a '70 LP Standard I bought new ( a long time ago...) and it still remains one of the finest playing and sounding guitars I've ever played. My Nashville buddies kept borrowing it for sessions because it sounded so good. Not really sure why it's so nice, but it is, and beats the hell out of any Custom I've ever played. Maybe fancying something up wrecks its integrity...
I can't tell you either, except most guys I know (myself included) would much rather have a standard than a custom ... I don't think the custom sounds as alive for some reason ... like there is something missing in the mids or something, The standard has a complexity in the tone that I just don't hear in a custom ... I generally hate the customs, plus I like that rosewood finger board over ebony anyway, and those trapezoid markers over those blocks, just a cosmetic quirk of mine.
Maybe standards are jst in bigger demand? I love the custom alot, but something abut the standard to me just seems like a true work of art. Maybe tis all that gold hardeareor excess bindfing that takes the custom down? Dont get me wrong the custom is amazing! BUt i would take a standrad over it anyday, or a calssic as a matter of fact! I WANT A LP CLASSIC!
I can't tell you either, except most guys I know (myself included) would much rather have a standard than a custom ... I don't think the custom sounds as alive for some reason ... like there is something missing in the mids or something, The standard has a complexity in the tone that I just don't hear in a custom ... I generally hate the customs, plus I like that rosewood finger board over ebony anyway, and those trapezoid markers over those blocks, just a cosmetic quirk of mine.
LOL, Kent. You just answered the question and didn´t realize it
Like with everything, "supply and Demand". The supply of 70s Standards isn´t enough to cover the demand, therfore the higher asking price. 70s customs on the other hand nobody seems to want, therefore the "usually lower) price
LOL, Kent. You just answered the question and didn´t realize it
Like with everything, "supply and Demand". The supply of 70s Standards isn´t enough to cover the demand, therfore the higher asking price. 70s customs on the other hand nobody seems to want, therefore the "usually lower) price
BTW Zerberus, isn't there a difference in the top or cap of the customs vs. the standards ... I heard that one time, but I don't know, never seen one stripped down ... You got any info on that as to the actual construction ... errr materials differences? Thanks.
The '50s Customs had a Mahogany top instead of maple. When the Custom was re-introduced in '68 it had a maple top like the Standard as do all std production Customs since.
Many LP Customs from that era have the fretless wonder frets...ground almost flat. I hate those frets. Also most have ebony figerboards with big pearl inlays and double bound bodies. Most players don't want that look...they like the look of the standard models. So it comes down to supply and demand. There's more demand for the standards. That's about it... Lew
For me, I like the standards better. I bought mine in 91, I like the feel of rosewood over ebony on a LP. I have had the frets dressed, but thats it.... It;s a better guitar than any custom I have played.