danglybanger
ReelItInologist
... So I have two acoustics with them, like the sound of both of them, enjoy the tweakability. By adjustable I mean one saddle, little metal screws on either side to set the height. Now start disagreeing with me 
One of them is a cheap, $80 axe which possibly, out of the box, was among the best playing/sounding acoustics I'd ever encountered... Which is why I bought it when I really didn't need it
Generic brand, ebonized rosewood board, but (apparently, from looking inside the thing and realizing that the grain pattern is the same inside and out) solid top, back and sides, and light as a feather. So the adjustable bridge at least doesn't hold it back...
The other is an ancient, 70s Takamine, which I used to hate because it sounded too... round and brittle, not open or chimey at all, felt like it had way too much string tension and was hard as hell to play/bend... (also I still hate the neck shape, but that's another story).
Took a screwdriver to the adjustable bridge to adjust the action downward (!), which reduced the string tension... and just completely opened up the tone and improved the feel... It almost sounds better than my $80 thing, I really can't decide... I'd had the action jacked up because the frets were so worn, now I'm just living with a few bad frets til I can have them leveled, and enjoying the looser, more open feel/tone.
Now I'm sure that the adjustable bridge doesn't automatically make a guitar not sound like ****, as I've played plenty of great axes (like my dad's new Takamine... or ANYONE else's acoustic lol) which don't have them... But it seems to be easier for the novice to then make it NOT sound that way should an axe be so equipped (most novices won't chance filing down the saddle, or buying a replacement), and it definitely doesn't seem to break your tone at any rate. Or at least mine.
But... experiences with it? Haters?
I suppose I won't know for sure til I replace either of the bridges with fixed...
But I don't want to. And that's almost what matters
One of them is a cheap, $80 axe which possibly, out of the box, was among the best playing/sounding acoustics I'd ever encountered... Which is why I bought it when I really didn't need it
The other is an ancient, 70s Takamine, which I used to hate because it sounded too... round and brittle, not open or chimey at all, felt like it had way too much string tension and was hard as hell to play/bend... (also I still hate the neck shape, but that's another story).
Took a screwdriver to the adjustable bridge to adjust the action downward (!), which reduced the string tension... and just completely opened up the tone and improved the feel... It almost sounds better than my $80 thing, I really can't decide... I'd had the action jacked up because the frets were so worn, now I'm just living with a few bad frets til I can have them leveled, and enjoying the looser, more open feel/tone.
Now I'm sure that the adjustable bridge doesn't automatically make a guitar not sound like ****, as I've played plenty of great axes (like my dad's new Takamine... or ANYONE else's acoustic lol) which don't have them... But it seems to be easier for the novice to then make it NOT sound that way should an axe be so equipped (most novices won't chance filing down the saddle, or buying a replacement), and it definitely doesn't seem to break your tone at any rate. Or at least mine.
But... experiences with it? Haters?
But I don't want to. And that's almost what matters
Last edited: