after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

PRS Santana and Mira are basically the same shape as the Gibson double-cuts. Santana is 24.5" scale with a trem, Mira is 25" and a fixed bridge. Santanas are also present in the import SE line.
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

Those 594s look super sweet!

The various McCarty models have a slightly deeper body than regular PRSs. Brings them a step closer to Les Paul territory.
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

I don't get it. Aren't all double cutaway PRS's cut basically the same?
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

If you want singlecut LP tone you won't get it from a DC. Structure around the neck join is vitally important.

Its well reported that SC juniors and DC juniors have a different vibe. That extends to anything where you lose wood in that area.
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

with PRS we often read "i have changed the pickups "

about the SE

and "i have changed the tuners "lol
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

another question would be: tremolo or not ?

the LP have not a tremolo (except the axcess or just one new guitar)

so versatility vs bends out of tune ?
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

with PRS we often read "i have changed the pickups "

about the SE

and "i have changed the tuners "lol
I have two PRS SE's. One came with EMG's stock and the other with Korean G&L PRS-Designed pickups. I changed them both. The EMG's didn't really need changing, but I wanted something else, and the Korean pickups weren't terrible, but they were not great either.

The tuners on both are bad. They are not atrocious, but Grovers are cheap and they are undoubtedly better.

Both guitars play and sound great acoustically, though, so the changes are worth it, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

As the owner of both regular Lps and a carved top LP Double Cutaway I can attest that the Double cut does not sound like a conventional Les Paul, it's more like 60% SG 40% LP
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

As the owner of both regular Lps and a carved top LP Double Cutaway I can attest that the Double cut does not sound like a conventional Les Paul, it's more like 60% SG 40% LP

interesting
in the comments, i have found a lot of comments like this

lp classic double cutaway with bb pro
or lp standard double cutaway with bb pro

i talk about the last models 2014-2016
and these ones are the models i want the most

and so the sound is not warm or not bright enough or?
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

As the owner of both regular Lps and a carved top LP Double Cutaway I can attest that the Double cut does not sound like a conventional Les Paul, it's more like 60% SG 40% LP

You mean both Gibson Les Pauls? Yes, I agree. Sold my Gibson LP DC, because the sound was very different from the single cut. That thing has a semi-hollow body.
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

You mean both Gibson Les Pauls? Yes, I agree. Sold my Gibson LP DC, because the sound was very different from the single cut. That thing has a semi-hollow body.

It could partially be the chambered body that throws it off, but it still doesn't sound like my chambered single cutaway LP Studio either. I can't quite put my finger on what's different, but I have Duncan Distortions in it right now, and it's been so long since I pulled the 57 classics out I don't remember what they sounded like
 
Re: after a Gibson LP, a PRS Double Cut Model

I don't get it. Aren't all double cutaway PRS's cut basically the same?

Nope. McCartys are a little thicker. Didn't realize this myself until I got one. Surprising that a a small bit of extra depth would affect the sound and feel but I think it really does.
 
Back
Top