Re: Any Drawbacks Using a Humbucker For Middle Pickup in a Strat?
^^^ I agree, plus when it comes to parallel switching, the weakest pup (among the two or thee) dominates the sound, and very few people seek big tones out of their middle pup. IMHO the purpose of the middle pup is either their single position thin treble sound, or the quack. I have wired my strat with DMZ FT2/FT1/Chopper, with separate push/pull for parallel series in bridge and neck, and also a mini togle for adding the bridge (in parallel) in any combination (totally 17 combinations).
Now when i am in position 1 (neck) and in series, and activate the toggle (add bridge, also wired in series) i get a big sounding tele tone! Something i never had in any guitar i had (i never had any tele). Now, when i just switch to position 2 (neck/middle), keeping all other parameters the same (the toggle still activated)? I get an ultra unientersting and bland tone, which completely sucks in relation to the previous tone. So having all 3 pups in parallel just sounds bad. Removing the middle from the circuit and the tone becomes sweet again.
There is a reason, why in any HSH (or even HHH) combination, the middle pup is always the weakest. So, in theory there is nothing against a mid pup as long as it is thin sounding and weaker than neck/bridge.