The one feature I liked in theory on them was the wider neck. It didn't work for me in practice, however. I didn't like that the profile was so thin. It was very much reminiscent of many classical guitar necks - not so easy to handle for rock-n-roll, country, and r&b, like most of us play.
Whenever I do an assembly, I will always go for a 1-3/4" (i.e. wide) nut if it is offered. But to my hand, a neck with a lot of width needs more meat behind it than a neck with a more standard width. To my taste, a hearty/chunky soft or medium-soft V works very well with a wide nut, but not a thin neck. Also, the smaller the radius, the better it tends to work IME.
My dream Les Paul has a 7-1/4" radius and medium-soft V with a1-3/4" nut and skinny Fender frets, while retaining Gibson-style materials and construction (set mahogany neck, etc.).
Did you return it also?
I am surprised the width bothered you being a bass player too
I liked the adjustable brass nut a lot and the width did not bother me really.
I was only asking for the opinions of people who owned them but as usual...
The one feature I liked in theory on them was the wider neck. It didn't work for me in practice, however. I didn't like that the profile was so thin. It was very much reminiscent of many classical guitar necks - not so easy to handle for rock-n-roll, country, and r&b, like most of us play.
Whenever I do an assembly, I will always go for a 1-3/4" (i.e. wide) nut if it is offered. But to my hand, a neck with a lot of width needs more meat behind it than a neck with a more standard width. To my taste, a hearty/chunky soft or medium-soft V works very well with a wide nut, but not a thin neck. Also, the smaller the radius, the better it tends to work IME.
My dream Les Paul has a 7-1/4" radius and medium-soft V with a1-3/4" nut and skinny Fender frets, while retaining Gibson-style materials and construction (set mahogany neck, etc.).