It would make Gibson a cartel, which tracks. I compared a Les Paul over $3000 directly to my much cheaper LP shaped Ibanez and I really wanted to love it and feel where that extra money would be going and I was extremely disappointed with the look, feel and even sound. Then again I have had extensive time with a Gibson before that had “that sound” and I don’t remember it being particularly uncomfortable, but shouldn’t the QC make all of them like that instead of literally as much a dice-roll as Epiphone etc. if it’s going to be any good.Would that make all of the knockoffs, counterfit and lawsuit Gibsons meth?
... asking for a friend.
![]()
I think the connection is that you have to be high on crack to think you got a good deal on a Gibson.
I think the connection is that you have to be high on crack to think you got a good deal on a Gibson.
$400 for a Gold Top Standard, no crack needed, my friend.
like never happens.
like never happens.
I remember when you could walk into a pawn shop in the 1970's in any city & buy a Les Paul Custom for $400.
I paid $400 for my Goldtop.
This is another quite silly thread. We are talking about the value of an object. Even if the quality of Gibson was in the toilet, which I feel it isn't. Value is a relative subject. A gallon of water for $5 is not a great value, but if you were dehydrated and had not seen water in days, you would gladly pay $20. It is ridiculous to even try to debate the price and value of a non-commodity product. Need, desire, and disposable income all come into play. If you find a guitar at half the cost of a Gibson that works for you, great, you have found value in that guitar. That doesn't mean anyone else finds the same value. Someone playing a Harley Benton might even think you overpaid. Like I said it is silly to try to gauge the perceived value of a non-commodity for anyone but yourself.
That’s almost $3000 in today’s money.
Not remotely. Adjusted for inflation…um no not really. $400 in 1970 and $400 now is still $400.
Which weighs more a pound of feathers or a pound of lead ?
Answer : a pound is a pound.
Not remotely. Adjusted for inflation…