Re: Are High end prs guitars worth the money?
Why set the "high end" bar at $2k+ ? That seems kind of arbitrary.
To me, PRS has three tiers.
Tier 1 is their custom shop "Private Stock" program where it is not uncommon to crack $10k on a single piece when it's all said and done.
Tier 2 is their US production line, comprising the bulk of their models, and ranging in price from around $1500 to $4000 or so.
Tier 3 would be the Korean SE line, which AFAIK dwells entirely in sub-$1k land.
"High end" as it equates to PRS could probably be placed at any of three distinct places... either at the made-in-the-USA tag, which starts at around $1.5k, or at the Private Stock program, or somewhere in between and deal with limited runs, special editions, 10-tops, Artist Packages, and the like.
As for it being worth the investment... You've got to deal with the law of diminishing returns like anything else. At some point you'll hit the ceiling for things like wood quality, electronics, hardware, and production quality/consistency and enter into the realm of solid rosewood necks, highly-figured maple tops, other exotic woods, etc. and that stuff is really only worth what the individual is willing to pay for it. The one exception might be the 513 model due to it's totally unique feature set and high price tag, but it's kind of a freak model anyway and might fall outside the scope of the question.
One thing to consider is the fact that 1.) PRS guitars exist in that upper echelon of production quality in mass-produced USA instruments along with Hamer, EBMM, Heritage, etc. Another thing to consider 2.) is the fact that in terms of retaining their value as an investment, PRS is head, shoulders, and elbows above any of those other companies who all take a hit in resale as soon as you open the case. If you're the type to buy guitars for investment value or tend to turn stuff over a lot for new stuff, it's definitely worth noting that PRS is one brand you can actually buy new and not end up taking it up the ass (with a twist!) when you want to sell.
I've owned two PRSi - one that retailed (and sold for) excess of $3k, and my Mira for which I paid sub $1.5k new - and I've played a great many others over the years. Personally, for my own uses, once you cross the line of utilitarian upgrades and into the more extravagant aesthetic elements, I stop feeling like spending my cash. I'm not moved much by crazy quilted maple these days. My first PRS was my first "nice" guitar. It was a 1-of-a-kind McCarty Rosewood with a 1-piece natural 10-top and a solid Indian rosewood neck and the bird inlays. It was an awesome, gorgeous, great-playing instrument, but I sold it because I felt that it was too much money tied up in a guitar I wouldn't want to gig with (for fear of damage). My Mira is (to me) every bit as good, cost me less than 1/2 what the McCarty did, and I'm not gonna freak out when a stray cymbal boom takes a chunk out of it.
The moral of the story here is that you really can't lose with PRS because you're going to be able to get most (if not all) of your money back out of it if and when you sell. Out of your non-Gibson/Fender USA-made options, it's probably your best bet for a brand new guitar due to it's tendency to resist depreciation. However it makes sense that, when buying used, you're going to get just as much guitar (or more) for less bread by buying a Hamer or Carvin or Heritage or G&L or EBMM because someone else took the resale hit for you.
So I guess you can draw your own conclusions from that. Sorry for the long post - this comes up from time to time and I've had some time to consider it.