BlueTalon
New member
Re: Bartolinis
You are assuming that I did not want that to happen, and that's what made it a bad idea. Incorrect. The thing that made it a bad idea is that that each coil by itself does not produce a signal strong enough to be usable for what I wanted.
Everybody has the right to like what they like, so I don't begrudge anybody their choice of equipment. I will say however that having one pickup significantly louder than another makse a bass tonally less flexible. It might work for you if the bass produces a tone you like, but anyone looking for something different will be limited.
It's a bad idea because those pickups work in essentially the same way that a p-bass pickup does; one coil picks up the E & A, while the other picks up the D & G. If you were to split it, only half of your strings would produce signal.
You are assuming that I did not want that to happen, and that's what made it a bad idea. Incorrect. The thing that made it a bad idea is that that each coil by itself does not produce a signal strong enough to be usable for what I wanted.
On another note, I really like and prefer a PJ setup, but only with a reversed P as IMO it fixes a lot of the issues with the traditional P alignment. It's true that the P pickup is louder than the J, but with this setup it really isn't a huge issue as it sounds more like a fuller-sounding Jazz than a Traditional Precision anyway. Lastly regarding amplification, I've played the TC amps and Phil Jones cabs, and they're really not my cup of tea. I much prefer an Ampeg through a fEARful. (anyone familiar with Talkbass should know what that is)
Everybody has the right to like what they like, so I don't begrudge anybody their choice of equipment. I will say however that having one pickup significantly louder than another makse a bass tonally less flexible. It might work for you if the bass produces a tone you like, but anyone looking for something different will be limited.
Last edited: