on the ibby's 300 is 4 stringTook a look at some stuff in Sam Ash today. The basic Ibanez stuff speaks to me...
4 v 5 strings? You guys all talking about 4???
Took a look at some stuff in Sam Ash today. The basic Ibanez stuff speaks to me...
4 v 5 strings? You guys all talking about 4???
^^ This..^^ The "Poor Mans Ricky". Possibly the most versatile passive bass ever made as a production bass. And very usable sounds, nice neck. Just a bit hard to find and yes heavy. A classic amongst bassists. Price is rising to the $450+ now here in Texas.
LOL!! I would recommend a P-Bass over any bass for a desert island bass. There is no sound it can't cover well. It is the classic versatile rock, pop, punk, jazz, funk, metal bass. If you HAD to get a 2 pickup bass, a P-J is my first choice. Soapbar basses may offer a certain sound, but they can't get classic tones well. And Aceman, I know you speak in budget terms but it has been my experience that nicer the instrument, the more enjoyable/easier/satisfying it is to play and keep. This does not mean 'cheap bass' with hardware/pickup upgrade. This means a nice instrument to start and this is more relevant if this may be your only bass ever. A Squier P from the 80s is worth its price in gold. Lots of options for you.... cheers and good luck!
What you're recommending isn't a bass. It's a restrung guitar. A restrung guitar won't sound nearly as much like a bass as any regular bass would, and especially won't sound as much like a bass as what the OP expects a bass to sound like.
AHEM!!!I am surprised that, knowing Aceman's Gibson leanings, nobody has suggested an Epiphone Thunderbird, Vee or Explorer bass.
Generally fair, but for $20 it might be worth it anyway! In the right guitar, of course.
IMHO it would just be a waste of $20. Look, 30" is considered really short for a bass scale, 34" is pretty much the norm. There's a reason for that -- actually, there's a bunch of reasons, having to do with string tension, string width, and the characteristics of low frequency string vibration, and resulting volume and tone.
You are recommending trying to turn a 25" scale guitar into a bass just by changing the strings. It isn't going to work. First of all, putting acoustic strings on an electric guitar is a non-starter, if the idea is to run a signal through an amp. Nylon strings don't give magnetic pickups anything to pick up. Unless the guitar is equipped with optical sensors (or piezo's, not sure about that one), there won't be any signal.
But even if you put nickle-wound strings, you've still got to deal with the short scale. The shorter the scale, the thicker the string has to be to have enough tension to be able to vibrate without flopping. Shorter scale means not as much volume, and thicker strings means less tonal range. And once you start putting substantially thicker strings on a guitar, you have to start making the openings bigger on the nut and the string saddles, and now you're into it for way more than $20.
Fair point. You said "accoustic" and my mind thought "nylon", which was not what you were referring to. My bad.Well, technically any steel-core string will work on an electric, and even the bronze-wound strings have steel cores. I've been using acoustic strings on my electrics almost as long as I've been playing, because they're easier to find in gauges that don't feel like trash. I've also found I like the way they sound better, which is a weird preference, but I guess will happen if you get accustomed to a thing.
I didn't know you were a guitar tech. But I was trying to explain, not lecture. And my primary point wasn't about the additional cost of a nut/saddles, it was about the infeasibility of stringing up a regular guitar to be a good bass. Was anything I said about that factually incorrect? Even baritone guitars, with a 28" scale, typically only drop 4 or 5 notes from the low E on a 25" guitar. Dropping a full octave without increasing scale length at all, and with the string spacing of a normal 6-string electric guitar, is just bad tone and bad playability waiting to happen, IMO.And sir! You don't need to lecture me on the way guitars work, I am literally a guitar technician! That's how I make money. So I guess I wasn't taking into account the cost of a new nut, (because the cost of a new nut to me is zero.) But I also know from constantly dropping tunings and consequently using thicker strings that pretty much anywhere you mount a guitar string to will be able to accommodate .092", because I've measured them. It might get a little hairy on a Strat trem just because of the path the string needs to take, but it also might not? I'll report back.
EDIT: A Strat accommodates at least up to .100", but it's tight.
Fair point. You said "accoustic" and my mind thought "nylon", which was not what you were referring to. My bad.
I didn't know you were a guitar tech. But I was trying to explain, not lecture. And my primary point wasn't about the additional cost of a nut/saddles, it was about the infeasibility of stringing up a regular guitar to be a good bass. Was anything I said about that factually incorrect? Even baritone guitars, with a 28" scale, typically only drop 4 or 5 notes from the low E on a 25" guitar. Dropping a full octave without increasing scale length at all, and with the string spacing of a normal 6-string electric guitar, is just bad tone and bad playability waiting to happen, IMO.
I'm not saying it can't be done at all. I just seriously doubt it will work well, and be able to function like a 34" or 30" bass guitar. But I'll be willing to eat my words if you try it and can get it to work well.
However, for a guitar player who wants to have one do-it-all bass at his disposal, and doesn't want to spend much on the bass because every dollar he spends on a bass is a dollar he can't spend on guitars, turning one of his guitars into a can't-do-it-all bass is probably not the optimum choice.