Diego
New member
Re: Basswood Vs. Mahogany
I think the common mistake is getting conclusions from cheap basswood guitars, and believing that the stuff MusicMan, Japan Ibanez and John Suhr use is the same.
Just like the mahogany on my Ibanez SZ probably isn't 'proper' mahogany at all, the wood found in lower-grade Ibanez RG shouldn't pass as basswood either.
I had a Japanese RG basswood Ibanez. No maple cap, but still it had a thick, warm tone, despite the floating trem and the thin neck.
It loved high output and low output pickups. It could achieve a wide palette of sounds convincingly.
I also had a Ibanez RG350DX, from a friend for a while. No amount of love could make that thing sound good. It was horrid.
Crusty, what do you think of John Suhr sticking to basswood with a maple cap for his top axes, and saying it's probably the Holy Grail of tone?
Surely it's not all firewood.
I think the common mistake is getting conclusions from cheap basswood guitars, and believing that the stuff MusicMan, Japan Ibanez and John Suhr use is the same.
Just like the mahogany on my Ibanez SZ probably isn't 'proper' mahogany at all, the wood found in lower-grade Ibanez RG shouldn't pass as basswood either.
I had a Japanese RG basswood Ibanez. No maple cap, but still it had a thick, warm tone, despite the floating trem and the thin neck.
It loved high output and low output pickups. It could achieve a wide palette of sounds convincingly.
I also had a Ibanez RG350DX, from a friend for a while. No amount of love could make that thing sound good. It was horrid.
Crusty, what do you think of John Suhr sticking to basswood with a maple cap for his top axes, and saying it's probably the Holy Grail of tone?
Surely it's not all firewood.