rspst14 said:They are nothing alike. The Custom 5 has a scooped midrange, with a ton of bass and treble. The BBQ has a nice bass response, but it also has boosted mids and a slightly rolled back treble response. The Custom 5 is a very bright pickup, while the BBQ is one of the warmest sounding alnico 5 pickups I've tried. As far as output, I would say the BBQ has a little less output than the C5. Personally, I love the BBQ and hate the C5. It depends a lot on your setup and the tone you're after, but I don't typically recommend the C5 unless you have a dark sounding guitar and an amp that is very midrange-heavy.
Ryan
January_Embers said:What about BBQ vs CC?
rspst14 said:They are nothing alike. The Custom 5 has a scooped midrange, with a ton of bass and treble. The BBQ has a nice bass response, but it also has boosted mids and a slightly rolled back treble response. The Custom 5 is a very bright pickup, while the BBQ is one of the warmest sounding alnico 5 pickups I've tried. As far as output, I would say the BBQ has a little less output than the C5. Personally, I love the BBQ and hate the C5. It depends a lot on your setup and the tone you're after, but I don't typically recommend the C5 unless you have a dark sounding guitar and an amp that is very midrange-heavy.
Ryan
rspst14 said:No, Duncan does not make a pickup similar to the BBQ. The closest they come is the Blues Trembucker, which is my favorite Duncan bridge pickup by the way. The EQ is somewhat in the ballpark, but the Blues has less output and a bit more treble than the BBQ.
The good thing about the BBQ is that Rio Grande designs them to be "one size fits all." They are slightly wider than a standard spaced humbucker, but not quite as wide as a trembucker. This is a good compromise which allows an almost perfect fit on a wide variety of guitars. So I wouldn't worry about the spacing.
Ryan
Gearjoneser said:This problem always leads me to the conclusion that Duncan needs another pickup, which would be a hot alnico 5 like a Custom 5 overwound. A big, fat ballsy A5 humbucker with big lower mids.
January_Embers said:How does it feel? Is it stiff or loose? Tight bass? Smooth highs? :question:
Edit: I currently have a C-5 and its too thin!
KLINKDETROIT said:Do they make a BBQ that is hotter than the C5?
papersoul said:Ryan, can you tell me more about the Blues Trembucker? This might be good in my PRS Mccarty since the spacing is a tad wider due to the fat neck.
Mac-P said:But the BBQ is warmer and has a bigger low end. MUCH bigger I might add than the C5 (which I find to be tinny, shrill and small sounding in the mix with a band).
rspst14 said:It has a strong bass response, a good amount of mids, and highs that are warm and sweet instead of bright and harsh. I wouldn't say it's stiff or loose sounding, but I would say it's the fattest sounding humbucker I've ever tried.
No, they only make one model, which has a little less output than the C5.
The Blues is my favorite Duncan bridge pickup. It uses the special parallel axis design, so it does look a little different. It sounds amazing though, think of it as a '59 with a little more output, a little less bass and treble, and a little more midrange. It has a very balanced EQ, and isn't too warm or too bright. It's a very versatile pickup that can cover a wide range of styles, and it works well in a lot of different guitars.
To my ears, the BBQ actually has a bit less low end than the C5. But I also used them in different guitars with different scale lengths and different neck construction methods, which probably accounts for some of the difference. I always felt like the C5 was excessively bassy in the low end, scooped in the mids, and then excessively bright in the high end. I agree that it can sound somewhat thin in certain guitars.
Ryan