Bedroom Levels

Re: Bedroom Levels

Yeah, best to keep that one somewhere separate where you won’t accidentally blow your ears out! Which is why an EQ pedal with a volume control is possibly better.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Yeah, best to keep that one somewhere separate where you won’t accidentally blow your ears out! Which is why an EQ pedal with a volume control is possibly better.

Really......

I don't find it reasonable to add extra stuff that's just making your rig sound worse, because of fear that you might accidentally dial it wrong...
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

How do you do that without attenuator?

Not all amps need power tube saturation to sound good honestly. I used to think like that, but not anymore.

You'd use a dummy load; "passive" or "reactive" (they each have their strengths). This item takes the place of the speaker (so your OT doesn't blow because of lack of a load on your amp).

There's lots of dummy load examples - HotPlate, Torpedo, UA, etc... make them. Many of them have built-in line outs (takes the speaker level signal and drops it to line level). Alternatively, you can get a separate line out box.

I've explained this concept in the past here a number of times, but most don't want to think outside the box. Slaving/line out has been around guitar-rig-wise since the late 60's. This concept in particular will free you completely from the constraints of weak bedroom level and mushy attenuator tone; a huge (yuuuuge?) benefit.

Not only can you get cranked tube amp tone at any volume, but you can add any FX after the entire amp (a la "in the studio" FX after recording your tracks). It's also a portable concept (there are many rackmount or even stompbox sized power amps out there).
 
Last edited:
Re: Bedroom Levels

You'd use a dummy load; "passive" or "reactive" (they each have their strengths). This item takes the place of the speaker (so your OT doesn't blow because of lack of a load on your amp).

There's lots of dummy load examples - HotPlate, Torpedo, UA, etc... make them. Many of them have built-in line outs (takes the speaker level signal and drops it to line level). Alternatively, you can get a separate line out box.

I've explained this concept in the past here a number of times, but most don't want to think outside the box. Slaving/line out has been around guitar-rig-wise since the late 60's. This concept in particular will free you completely from the constraints of weak bedroom level and mushy attenuator tone; a huge (yuuuuge?) benefit.

Not only can you get cranked tube amp tone at any volume, but you can add any FX after the entire amp (a la "in the studio" FX after recording your tracks). It's also a portable concept (there are many rackmount or even stompbox sized power amps out there).

It was a rhetoric question... That's very much definition of attenuator in my understanding: What they do is to add load in place of speaker and attenuate output to line-level.

I guess modern reactive loads can be very good, but in the essence they're just attenuators. Albeit complex ones.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

It was a rhetoric question... That's very much definition of attenuator in my understanding: What they do is to add load in place of speaker and attenuate output to line-level.

I guess modern reactive loads can be very good, but in the essence they're just attenuators. Albeit complex ones.

Device-wise (all semantics aside), there's a difference between an attenuator and a dummy load. Also, there is a huge difference in tone if said attenuator is attenuating drastically.

Regarding the semantics ("attenuate"):

Think of an attenuator as a big adjustable volume knob.
Think of a dummy load as a silent speaker.

I will always extol the virtues of the dummy load / slave setup, because it changed my "life". I struggled for decades trying to find a solution to ****ty bedroom tone (master vols, attenuators, etc)... then one day I looked outside the typical gear advice du jour from forum parrots and found the answer.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Device-wise (all semantics aside), there's a difference between an attenuator and a dummy load. Also, there is a huge difference in tone if said attenuator is attenuating drastically.

Regarding the semantics ("attenuate"):

Think of an attenuator as a big adjustable volume knob.
Think of a dummy load as a silent speaker.

I will always extol the virtues of the dummy load / slave setup, because it changed my "life". I struggled for decades trying to find a solution to ****ty bedroom tone (master vols, attenuators, etc)... then one day I looked outside the typical gear advice du jour from forum parrots and found the answer.

I don't have much experience with the topic, but fail to understand why it would be so much worse?

Attenuator is basically just dummy load parallel with speaker. Why that would be worse than a dummy load without the said speaker? Adding cab sims and/or effects after power amp of course makes difference, but that's other thing.

I was very close at going the same route with my home rig. Eventually opted out, mostly because I couldn't find quality load that would be cheap enough. Lost interest in that kind of comlex rig after switching to Egnater Rebel: That amp sound just as good in any volume.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

I don't have much experience with the topic, but fail to understand why it would be so much worse?

Because the more your attenuate (with attenuator), the more the tone gets compressed.

At high levels of attentuation (with attenuator), the tone is severely compressed and thus
loses all dynamics - producing a flat, lifeless "cardboard" tone.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Because the more your attenuate (with attenuator), the more the tone gets compressed.

At high levels of attentuation (with attenuator), the tone is severely compressed and thus
loses all dynamics - producing a flat, lifeless "cardboard" tone.

Not if that's done with reactive load like you would with dummy load. Other way around, using regular attenuator as dummy load would be the worst, and would kill all the dynamics.

Sorry for getting caught in the semantics, but the basics how dummy load and attenuators work is exactly same. They load the amp with replacement of speaker that turns power in to heat instead of sound. Statement that dummy load somehow is better for tone is only true if you compare equipment of different design.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Sorry for getting caught in the semantics, but the basics how dummy load and attenuators work is exactly same. They load the amp with replacement of speaker that turns power in to heat instead of sound. Statement that dummy load somehow is better for tone is only true if you compare equipment of different design.

+1

Reactive is reactive and resistive is resistive; the load device doesn't care if there's a speaker after (or in parallel with) it or not.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Anyhoo......................

For those who haven't, try a dummy load setup sometime (line out to DAW+iRs, or power amp, etc) and compare it to just using an attenuator.

I'll offer an example: my fully cranked (on "10" volume) '66 Fender Deluxe w/ dummy load into DAW+iRs.

In the room, my amp was of course dead silent even though it was dimed. This setup already beats the attenuator setup volume-wise because it's silent... not to mention the tone.

 
Last edited:
Re: Bedroom Levels

Of course, if you do need "stage" volume but don't want to blow yours and everyone else's eardrums out (not to mention, at home - piss off your neighbors)...

Then you simply run your line out into a power amp and adjust volume accordingly. No attenuator mush!

It's a g-d miracle, is what it is. Love it.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

I do have interest in building a rack with full amp, dummy load, and stereo power amp, and maybe assorted effects. But can't really justify myself the cost and impracticality compared to a nice sounding amp head and pedalboard.

Just waiting for Orange to release Rocker 32 head, so I can get my rig into stereo...
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

Instead of trying to make a big amp sound good at bedroom levels, I think that it would be more cost effective to just get a small amp that sounds good at bedroom levels.
To each their own.

Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

You can always go with one of these:

482812000000000-00-500x500.jpg

It's small and perfectly polite for bedroom levels.
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

I dunno...I haven't had an amp in my bedroom for years. I'm either playing at a rehearsal, at a show, or at rehearsal/show levels in my jam space. It's not that loud...
 
Re: Bedroom Levels

I wouldn't want an amp in my bedroom anymore than I would want a TV.
The amp that I play in the music room when someone is asleep in the bedroom is my Jet City Picovalve.
f067d5528d351d0778b31f0a51be616f.jpg


Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top