Chrome and zinc ain't mutually exclusive
Chrome is the default shiny-coating on the outside
Zinc is the usual pressed-and-heated powdered crap on the inside
Callingham and Glendale are the most expensive and closest to vintage Fender saddles, but Graphtec saddles work well. Wilkinson also makes good quality saddles for a reasonable price.
Yep. But how would you distinguish zinc ones?
I tried to find steel saddles: Bying whole Wilkinson trem with steel saddles turned out to be cheaper than just those saddles anywhere.
If it's chromed or painted, you can't, unless you trust manufacturer specs or demolish one
If it's bent bare steel, you can see it
PS btw, afaik, "Wilkinson" is nowadays the new name for "Chinese/Korean Gotoh products"... with the old hiend Wilkinson fare instead branded Wilkinson/Gotoh
Yep. But how would you distinguish zinc ones?
I tried to find steel saddles: Bying whole Wilkinson trem with steel saddles turned out to be cheaper than just those saddles anywhere.
I'm liking the Graphtech saddles
![]()
That looks a LOT like my Strat
![]()
In the case of the block saddles, I think steel ones would show an attraction to a magnet and the zinc ones wouldn't. The vintage type Fender bent saddles are steel, the Highwoods look like the regular bent steel saddles but have an ingenious height screw design where the screws don't protrude over the top of the saddles. I don't know why you would want block saddles over the bent steel type anyway, I think the bent steel type is better, but it is up to you. Whatever saddles you buy, just make sure they are the correct width for your guitar, Asian made guitars have metric saddles that are slightly narrower than American ones.
Al
Stainless steel is often non-magnetic
Width issue is often about Fender-vintage-widespaced vs. Fender-modern-narrow, and the one place you'll most often encounter fender-vintage-WIDE is Japanese Fender/Squier...as well as maybe the knockoff brands
The Mexican Standard Strats also used Asian trems that have metric (norrower) saddles, so those have to be considered also.
Al
The AMERICAN strat uses narrow saddles. Ditto the Mexican
The JAPANESE strat uses WIDE saddles
The AMERICAN strat uses narrow saddles. Ditto the Mexican
The JAPANESE strat uses WIDE saddles
They may have changed the trems on the newer Mexican Standard Strats (or whatever they are calling them now), but in the past the trems are Asian trems with metric saddles, which are narrower than the vintage American type. The Mex standards have a narrower string spacing then the vintage American Strats, and the saddles have to be narrower to fit the narrower string spacing. I don't know about the Japanese Strats, but there is a difference between the saddles on American and Mexican Standards.
Al
I don't know how they are "metric", but the mexican/asian string spacing 52mm (2.05) and american 56mm (2.20).
Japanese is 55.5-56mm... a bridge hotrail barely reaches the E strings with 1 rail on each side
But at least that's well known... how about the existence of 50 and ~52mm tuneamatics, the second of which requires Fspaced humbuckers, were you aware of that fun tidbit?
So Japanese use the same width as american, ie the wider spacing. Good to know.
I know nothing about tune-o-matics.
Same as OLD american and SOME vintage correct models
Most americans, at least '90s and '00s, seem to have used narrow spacing. I'm not aware of any mass reversion to vintage spec