Christopher Caruana
New member
Re: Blog: Cage Match between Gig Bags and Hardshell Cases
I always roll with a hardshell
I always roll with a hardshell
True, they're guitars that aren't meant to be tossed around by chimps. One of the benefits Fender players like to tout is that 'the necks are easily replaced when you break them', as if that's a regular occurrence for them. I don't understand what people do to their guitars that this feature is a selling point. I've owned dozens of guitars with angled headstocks over the years, and never broke or cracked one of them. It should be a non-issue for most people.
With Fender headstocks requiring a string tree and having 6 tuners jammed together like sardines, I can't say that's the epitome of a 'well thought-out headstock.'

I've gotta say, I love the rectangle G&G cases! I've got 4, and I need another for the Tele!
For drive-to gigs, I much prefer bags. For fly-to gigs, I prefer having my guitar ride in the cabin next to me in a bag, but sometimes that involves a good deal of hassle, especially flying the puddle jumpers to and from Santa Barbara airport. Obviously, for check-in I'll use a hardshell case and spend most of the trip worrying about my guitar.
The like a Corbomite case myself.
That's a brilliant idea. I wonder if they'd consider it if they could fix the finish to mask the changes?My understanding is that Gibson could simply modify the design the of the head stock to have a "scarf" or two-piece head stock and it would be more durable and look pretty much the same, but they stick with an inferior design for the sake of purists, or so they say.