Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

i like bolt-on or neck-thru never have been crazy about set-neck
in saying that,my main guitar is a bolt-on a sustains like no other.

next guitar will probably be a neck-thru though..
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

I spend my days debating this in my mental asylum.

I like them all, But i wont be able to tell you which one i prefer until i have made all types.

I like the idea of a deep top mounted tenon. Found this one online.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

I like bolt-ons - you have the ability to just quickly swap the neck if **** hits the fan. You can also experiment with different fretboard/shaft woods, different radii, different neck profiles, scalloped boards, different finishes, etc. all relatively easily. It's all just a question of money on how much you'll spend on having spare necks laying around.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

Nothing better than a high quality bolt-on with a very low mechanical tolerance and a tight fit into the neck pocket, IMO. Especially if it has a contoured heel, you can have just as much upper-fret access as the other neck types. The problem is, nicely made bolt-on's with tight tolerances seem to be fairly rare for some reason.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

Of all the guitars I owned the Framus Panthera has by far the longest sustain. It has a bolt-on neck. With a tight fit and some massive screws though.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

The problem is, nicely made bolt-ons with tight tolerances seem to be fairly rare for some reason.


Because of the loose tolerances specific to work done by hand. CNC-routed neck pockets and neck heels, as long as the tolerances in the dimensions between the two are as tight as possible, will fit together as if they were one piece, just like machined components should be. However, when clinging to the notion of "made by hand", you also cling to the notion that those hands will be attached to a master, and that master can eyeball a perfect heel and pocket every time, taking off just enough material to make a self-locking joint where the bolts are just for show.

Then you have the fact that wood expands and contracts on its own depending on the atmospheric conditions, so one day you might see a gap around a neck heel, and on others you might notice finish cracks around the pocket.


Neck and body joint type alone does not guarantee tonal result, whether it's snappy, poppy, dark, more-sustaining, less-sustainful, or fuller/thinner/richer/poorer. I'm sitting in a room right now surrounded by neckthroughs, bolt-ons, and set-necks, with Floyds, tuneomatics, string-through and stopbars, made in USA, Japan, Indonesia, and Mexico, and almost as many different pickup models - JB, Distortion, Custom, 59, etc.
I have a snappy, bright mahogany/mahogany/rosewood neckthrough and a dark-toned maple/ebony bolt-on.

The biggest difference between them is the material quality, both in the body and the hardware. Some have drastically different EQ curves from others, but on average, they all have the same amount of sustain for both open and fretted notes.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

My favorite is set-thru.

Set necks can sound too blunt and neck-thru's too odd. Set-thru's smooth out the tone while and adds some structural benefits.

I tend to most like set/neck-thru/bolt-on when the neck wood is Maple.

In a set neck, maple glued to mahogany is life! Just bright attack married to a big slab o' mahogany...mm-mm good. In neck-thru the strength of maple shines but, is just tempered enough from the body wings. In bolt-on, it's like a set neck but, more plinky-sounding, or something. It's pretty rad, just different.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

IMHO woods are much more important than the construction method. The joint is just a small fraction of the whole system.
 
Re: Bolt-On / Glued-On / Neck-Through

I've grown to prefer bolt on guitars. My first electric was a Charvel Dinky, which as I'm sure you know is a bolt on type guitar. But when I was young I read articles touting the virtues of neck through construction, and bought into the hype for a long time. I did buy a Gibson Les Paul before I bought my first neck thru, a Jackson Soloist, so I do have a soft spot for set necks (I still regret parting ways with that Les Paul). But overall, I prefer the tone and feel I get from my bolt on guitars, most of which are Jackson Dinkys. Granted, the woods play a role in the tone, but as far as sustain goes, I haven't noticed much, if any of a difference in between the construction techniques.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top