JazzSinger
New member
I have a CoolRails in the neck and Vintage Rails in the mid position of a Steinberger style guitar.
My problem is both E strings are softer than the rest. This is especially annoying when using a Maestro Fuzz-Tone (gate effect).
The curvature of the pickup rail polepieces has a smaller radius than that of the strings, so the string gaps at the ends is bigger. I suppose I could "fix" this by lowering the pickups, but they are competing with a JB humbucker in the bridge, so I would have to lower that, too, losing some of the brightness.
Questions:
1. Are all SD "Rails"-style pickups made to the same radius?
2. Do other manufacturers (DiMarzio?) perhaps use a wider radius?
The Steinberger string spacing is too narrow for pups with adjustable-height pole pieces; I've already been there.
It would be nice if SD would include more detail in their product dimension info.
My problem is both E strings are softer than the rest. This is especially annoying when using a Maestro Fuzz-Tone (gate effect).
The curvature of the pickup rail polepieces has a smaller radius than that of the strings, so the string gaps at the ends is bigger. I suppose I could "fix" this by lowering the pickups, but they are competing with a JB humbucker in the bridge, so I would have to lower that, too, losing some of the brightness.
Questions:
1. Are all SD "Rails"-style pickups made to the same radius?
2. Do other manufacturers (DiMarzio?) perhaps use a wider radius?
The Steinberger string spacing is too narrow for pups with adjustable-height pole pieces; I've already been there.
It would be nice if SD would include more detail in their product dimension info.
Last edited: