Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

dr.barlo

New member
Here is my modest opinion of those, based on the ones I came across.

I am selling a friends 04LP standard (locally, so there ain't no reason to get exicited) and it came with BBV (= BBpros) hb's. The guitar is a good one (still my 95LP is beating the hell out of it, :dance: I am soo happy you know) and has a thick tone. Still you can hear each string separately, which is a mighty cool thing.

A fellow guitar player (with whom I played in the past), who came to me to check out the guitar said that he gotta hear it with Burstbuckers, he is a gibson freak. He is in the process of buying the guitar, that is at the end of the day he liked what he heard. And I got to sell a set of my burstbuckers from my R7 (which now employs a set of Rolph's 59's, excellent pickups). ;) I also changed the pots(CTS500K's) and caps (hovlands). BTW I did not make any money on that, it just that I kept that LP like a month. That's it. :banghead: Still keep the other set of BB's (from my R8) that I thought were better, which I told him right into his face. Anyway....

Ok here is the deal: The bridge BBV wasn't bad at all. In fact I was pleasantly surprised to find out that it did not sound thin. The eq separation is great. I can hear individual strings separately even in most screaming double bends and/or when the tone is rolled down. As I am saying I was pleasantly surprised to find that out. That bridge BBV is not a bad pickup at all. (Still I wouldn't buy it in the aftermarket ;) !)

On the other, the neck BBV was not good. It was too defined, too defined to be a neck LP tone you know. Shoot me! I also don't favor 59n's, and think that all of them need an a3 magnet. Anyway, that neck BBV was not my cup of tea.

BBV's were 8.20K bridge and 7.60K neck.

The BB's from my R7 which measure 8.35K bridge (BB2, a great value I love) and 7.80K neck (BB1). Have a2 magnets.

We liked the BB's way more. In my opinion in the neck BB1 killed BBV very clearly. It was rounder, and still had the definition. The individual strings could be heard separately, and the tone was round like any LP neck tone should be! :D The conclusion about the bridge was not easy. Dont' get me wrong the difference was quite noticable, but it depends on one's preferences. BB2 is THICKER than BBV :duh:, but in a good way. It is not necessarily darker, don't get me wrong. It is bright as BBV is, all right, but in a a2 kinda way, that is it is not that edgey. More spongy. What I heard out of the BB2 reminded me a lot my favorite PGb (8.35K too).

BTW I don't know the deal with wax potting BB's. I guess aftermarket one are not wax potted, and as far as I can tell mine were (took one of the screw pieces out of the pickup to see what color the screw bobin is. disappointment, why can't I be lucky you know). No sqling issues on any of those.

Finally, I installed my beloved 8.35K PGb (from early 90's a custom shop one, long legs no logo). That guy who was checking the guitar out, wanted to buy it right on spot. Even offered $100.00, which I refused. That's only one of the 4 PGb's I kept (and indeed the best one) after buying/trading at least 12 of them (don't remember).

Wanted to share that with you guys.

Best,

B
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

I've only tried the Burstbuckers in my buddy's '03 Les Paul Historic Plaintop. I'm sure they are the alnico 2 version. I think that Les Paul is the most authentic sounding '58 style Les Paul RI I've ever heard! The moment I plugged it in it took me right back to 1970 when I had a real one just like it.

We did a little shootout last year and I set up a bunch of old Fender amps: '51 Super, '53 Super, '58 Deluxe, '66 Deluxe Reverb, etc.

And we compared guitars: my '00 LP w/Holmes HB's...'03 LP w/ BB's...'92 Hamer Studio w/Harmonic Design Z-90 & C5...Hamer Monoco w/Seth & CC...'96 Hamer Studio w/Fralin 7.5K & 9.5K humbuckers.

I still thought the '03 LP w/BB's had the most authentic 50's LP tone...but I thought the two best were the Monoco w/Seth & CC and my own LP with the Holmes humbuckers.

I felt my own LP with the Holmes humbuckers had a better rock/blues tone: the ZZ Top/Jeff Beck Truth tone.

But as soon as Rondo plugged in my Monoco with the Seth & Custom Custom he said: "wow...that might be the best one right there."

That Monoco will do anything from Jazz to Blues to Rock.

If I had to pick a winner, it'd still be the Monoco with the Seth Lover neck & CC, followed by my LP with the Holmes humbuckers. Rondo picked his own LP with the Burstbuckers and gave #2 to the Monoco.

Lew
 
Last edited:
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

different people have different tastes so im not supprised that he like his best. in general i think the bb1/bb2 combo is the best that gibson has going right now. each pup sounds great by itself and the middle setting is very sweet.
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

jeremy said:
different people have different tastes so im not supprised that he like his best. in general i think the bb1/bb2 combo is the best that gibson has going right now. each pup sounds great by itself and the middle setting is very sweet.

I'll bet! I think the BB's must be the best pickups Gibson has made since about 1966. Like I said, I thought the a2 BB's had the most authentic 1958 Les Paul tone I've ever heard.

Anyways, after I had a chance to try the Duncan, Holmes and Fralin HB's so that I could put together my dream sets, I sold all of my old Gibson 50's pafs on Ebay!

Authentic or not, I prefer the tones I get from these newer pickups...the old ones sounded muffled by comparism...even though I used to love them.

I've never owned a better sounding guitar than my Monoco with the Seth Lover neck and Custom Custom bridge.
 
Last edited:
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

Lewguitar said:
I'll bet! I think the BB's must be the best pickups Gibson has made since about 1966. Like I said, I thought the a2 BB's had the most authentic 1958 Les Paul tone I've ever heard.

Anyways, after I had a chance to try the Duncan, Holmes and Fralin HB's so that I could put together my dream sets, I sold all of my old Gibson 50's pafs on Ebay!

Authentic or not, I prefer the tones I get from these newer pickups...the old ones sounded muffled by comparism...even though I used to love them.

I've never owned a better sounding guitar than my Monoco with the Seth Lover neck and Custom Custom bridge.

I'm glad to hear that you like the CC/Seth that much...I'm about to try a CC/APH-1 combo because of you!!!

I will agree the BB are the best Gibson pup in years! The GC in Atlanta had a 68CA RI LP Custom that had a BB3/BB2 set-up and that was the best sounding new LP I had EVER put my hands on, had it not been $3800.00 it would have been in my living room...a stock LP has not spoken to me like that one did since that one did...it rally was a great guitar!
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

I bought a BB2 and 3 last year. I put them in a Yamaha LP copy maple neck and top with an Agathis back. The guitar was brighter and livelier than a 78 maple neck Gibson LP with stock 7.6k PUs.

I loved the 2 in the neck and was not satisfied with the output of the bridge. Waxing them did take away from some of the glassiness. I sold the guitar, labled the BBs keepers, put them on a shelf and didn't use the PUs again until a #43/#44 hybrid experiment in which I could distinctly hear the sound of both PUs I'd robed a coil from when I was playing.

This inspired me to drop the BBs into the real deal for another sound ck. Unlike in the Yamaha the bass output of the BB2 in the neck was over whelming. Lowering the bass side and increasing the middle string pole height...well now the middle strings weren't at there sweet spot. The Classic is like this too but not nearly as bad.

My theory is each coil retains its voice in the output. Henry Z (Gibson CEO) said they strive to maintain a 1k offset between coils so a BB2 in the neck will sound like both a 7k and a 9k pickup.

Here's the math. A BB2 3.5k + 4.5k = 8k. 3.5k + 3.5k = 7k. 4.5k + 4.5k = 9k. A BB1 3.3 + 4.3 = 7.6k. 2 x 3.3 = 6.6k. 2 x 4.3 = 8.6.

I don't know what the coil offset on the PGn is but I suspect this is why SD targeted such a low DCR for that PU.

I know I slipped over the fence a couple of times here but I'm trying to convey the nature of the beast and not my personal taste.
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

jeremy said:
different people have different tastes so im not supprised that he like his best. in general i think the bb1/bb2 combo is the best that gibson has going right now. each pup sounds great by itself and the middle setting is very sweet.

Right on!

B
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

Lewguitar said:
...If I had to pick a winner, it'd still be the Monoco with the Seth Lover neck & CC, followed by my LP with the Holmes humbuckers. Rondo picked his own LP with the Burstbuckers and gave #2 to the Monoco.

Lew

You gotta try a set of antiquities in that Monoco of yours. CC's are great pickups, but to my ears they still have some of that condensed tight (non-open, non-transparent) tone of high output buckers. I would not be very surprised if you find out that your Monoco becomes a "better" historic than your historic. ;) The wood matters!

B
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

the guy who invented fire said:
I'm glad to hear that you like the CC/Seth that much...I'm about to try a CC/APH-1 combo because of you!!!

I will agree the BB are the best Gibson pup in years! The GC in Atlanta had a 68CA RI LP Custom that had a BB3/BB2 set-up and that was the best sounding new LP I had EVER put my hands on, had it not been $3800.00 it would have been in my living room...a stock LP has not spoken to me like that one did since that one did...it rally was a great guitar!

I hope you like it. My Monoco is a semi hollowbody and when I've tried the CC in other guitars I liked it but not as much as in my Monoco. The acoustic quality of that guitar really works well with that CC pickup. I liked it less when I tried it in my solid body Hamers. Seemed like I had to have the amp cranked loud (like EVH and his Marshalls) for it to really come to life in a solid body guitar. But it sure did come to life when played it loudly...even in my solid body guitars. :dance: I had the same issues with the Custom 5 too. Great tone when played through a cranked amp...but a little thin and not so lively played quietly. Lew
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

dr.barlo said:
You gotta try a set of antiquities in that Monoco of yours. CC's are great pickups, but to my ears they still have some of that condensed tight (non-open, non-transparent) tone of high output buckers. I would not be very surprised if you find out that your Monoco becomes a "better" historic than your historic. ;) The wood matters!

B

I would...except when I've compared it to other great guitars the Monoco always wins just like it is! :dance: I've thought about it, and Antiquitys are what I'd switch to if I were going to make a change, but the guitar sounds better than any other humbucking guitar I own just like it is.

I agree with you about the CC though. Like I said, when I've tried it in solid body guitars it's great (and very EVH like) when the amp is cranked but lacks something at lower, non-rock volumes.

The CC sounds best to me moved very close to the strings...that gives it a little, more brilliance.

Lew
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

The best Paul I played, bar none (even my Std with Pearly Gates, which I love) was a 68 RI Custom (the one with the antiqued finish & hardware) that was in a shop in San Antonio. Highs were clear as a bell, defined lows, and very muscular mids, with an almost vocal quality when letting a note sustain, even when clean.

That guitar had the BB1/BB2 set in it. I would have bought it on the spot, but I didn't have $5,000 on me that day. :saeek:
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

Benjy_26 said:
The best Paul I played, bar none (even my Std with Pearly Gates, which I love) was a 68 RI Custom (the one with the antiqued finish & hardware) that was in a shop in San Antonio. Highs were clear as a bell, defined lows, and very muscular mids, with an almost vocal quality when letting a note sustain, even when clean.

That guitar had the BB1/BB2 set in it. I would have bought it on the spot, but I didn't have $5,000 on me that day. :saeek:

Historics are GREAT guitars. But they are really expensive! :banghead:

B
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

Another great pickup for hollow and semi-hollow guitars is Gibson's 57 Classics. I've had them in 3 semi-hollow guitars and they sounded great in all 3. Warm and fat sounding but not muddy; they have some nice high end chime and are very balanced sounding.
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

dr.barlo said:
Historics are GREAT guitars. But they are really expensive! :banghead:

B


Definately. :) Gibson did a great job of taking the mojo of an old guitar and spreading it all over new ones. I've played the Fender relics, and while cool, they didn't stack up to this particular guitar.

When I win the lotto, I'll definately be getting one.



Or two. Hell, I'll get 'em all. :saeek: :burnout:
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

I'll bump this thread now that it has come up in another thread. I have a set of BB 1 and 2's in the new 57 Reissue LP and they sound very good. So good, the Antiquities haven't made it into it yet!
 
Re: Burstbuckers versus Burstbucker Pro's (BBV's)

Excellent descriptions. I think these types of detailed reviews should be archived. These questions always come up.

Thanks, Doc
 
Back
Top