halfmanhalfbiscuit
New member
Re: Ceramic vs Alnico
Thanks to Lewguitar for speaking so much sense! i believe many of the terms we use are describing different things. It took wine connisseurs decades, if not centuries, of debate to come up with the common terms of reference for evaluating wines, (some would say it's all rubbish there, but i don't think so), and tone evaluation is in its infancy.
I think everyone can relate to terms like "harsh" and "smooth" and "bassy", but others can be more subjective. When someone says a strat is "chimey" i can hear that, but I've never heard "quack" in a strat.
After a while one starts to get a feel for alnico vs ceramic, but the only way to really accurately learn is to swap out magnets on the same pickup. There are examples of this on youtube.
I find that ceramic pickups are tighter, more compressed, and have less overtones. Part of the results of the compression is to have less of the wood sound. I think that's why people say it's less organic.
Thanks to Lewguitar for speaking so much sense! i believe many of the terms we use are describing different things. It took wine connisseurs decades, if not centuries, of debate to come up with the common terms of reference for evaluating wines, (some would say it's all rubbish there, but i don't think so), and tone evaluation is in its infancy.
I think everyone can relate to terms like "harsh" and "smooth" and "bassy", but others can be more subjective. When someone says a strat is "chimey" i can hear that, but I've never heard "quack" in a strat.
After a while one starts to get a feel for alnico vs ceramic, but the only way to really accurately learn is to swap out magnets on the same pickup. There are examples of this on youtube.
I find that ceramic pickups are tighter, more compressed, and have less overtones. Part of the results of the compression is to have less of the wood sound. I think that's why people say it's less organic.