When changing strings is it bad to take them all off at once and proced to put new ones one or should they be done one string at a time till you eventualy have new strigns on?
i do mine one at a time, unless im cleaning the neck in between - its a whole lot easier to work when you havnt got the loose ends of the other strings flying around hehe
and on a floyd-equipped guitar, you *must* do them one at a time.. the tension cannot be releived on the bridge, else you got yourself a pain-in-the-ass bit of adjustment once their all back on
and on a floyd-equipped guitar, you *must* do them one at a time.. the tension cannot be releived on the bridge, else you got yourself a pain-in-the-ass bit of adjustment once their all back on
i do mine one at a time unless im working on the insrument. i have always been told that the neck of an accoustic guitar would warp if strings were not kept on it. i have had guitars in the shop for years with no strings and have yet to have the neck warp on one. but there could always be the first time.
It's a common misconception, I understand. String changes on floyds aren't any more of a pain than on string thru bodies. The only thing that takes longer is tuning, but the stability of the Floyds tuning makes it all worth it. I raw tune maybe once a week or so, and usually just to be dead on for band practice.
Also, if you break a string at the saddle, you just have to unlock the nut, unwind the string, and lock it back in. Way easier than putting a whole new set on.