Wattage said:Jeffrec ought to chime in shortly - this is tonal nirvana to him and know he has had a few conversations with MJ about pups to get EC's SG tone.
Jeffrec said:Watch the CREAM DVD where Clapton is sitting in front of a Marshall stack & demonstrating his techniques on the SG. It's THE tone I've been after.
Jeffrec said:CHIME!!!!!
Yes, Scott is right, I've been chasing this tone for years (taking into account the major tone factor in Clapton's hands). I agree with Lew, there's something in the midrange of his SG tone that's hard to describe, but it's where the unique tone comes from. Watch the CREAM DVD where Clapton is sitting in front of a Marshall stack & demonstrating his techniques on the SG. It's THE tone I've been after. I would say that it's worth experimenting with a '59 or Seth. on the other hand, I have a C-5 in my SG/LP reissue and can get pretty close to that tone. The CC does it, but with more mids than Clapton's SG sound.
My discussion with MJ about a pup she made for Warren Haynes, that is supposed to be based on Clapton's SG bridge pup, was helpful. She said they used an Alnico-2 magnet, which puzzled me because I would have thought that the '64 SG Standard Clapton used in Cream would have had an alnico-5 in it (which is why I thought of the SD '59 pup). I wasn't able find out whether she actually inspected Clapton's pickup, which would have been the deciding factor for me.
Jeff
Lewguitar said:Boy...I always thought that SG was older than that and that it was one of those Les Paul/SG's....not a '64 but more like a '61. But that's just what I thought from looking at it closely at the Grande Ballroom in '67 when Cream played there. John Sinclair (manager of the MC5) was an aquaintence of mine and let me get right up there and check out Clapton's Marshalls and gear too. The guitar wasn't onstage yet...Clapton carried the painted SG with him onto the stage. But I watched Cream's set from very close up. I can't say that I clearly remember seeing "Les Paul" on the pickguard between the neck pickup and fingerboard, but I always assumed that's what that SG was.
In any event, when I plug my Duncan 59's into my Marshall I get close to that tone.
But like Jeff says, if you know the licks and have the touch, you can get a pretty cool Clapton/Cream tone with just about any good humbucker: a2 Seth Lover, Antiquity and Custom Custom......or a5 59B, C5, etc.
Personally, its easiest for me with the 59B or 59 Trembucker.
Lew
I agree with this.Lewguitar said:According to that site, Clapton used a '60 Les Paul for the Bluesbreaker sessions.
Curly said:I agree with this.
I did a search on this once, and remember reading a comment from Peter Green that Eric's LP had a slimmer neck than Peter's '59. Peter said his '59 had a neck like a tree trunk, and Eric's was more playable.![]()
mrid said:"You don't even know who I am!" :laugh2:
Lewguitar said:Great photo! Compare that Les Paul to the one in my post #12. You can see the double cream neck pickup in that first Les paul and I'd suspect that the photo above is the second Les Paul that EC borrowed after his first LP, the one used for the Bluesbreaker sessions, was stolen.
Lew
Lewguitar said:When Jimi Hendrix landed in England, what guitarist did he want to meet? Eric Clapton.
Lew
Curly said:I agree with this.
I did a search on this once, and remember reading a comment from Peter Green that Eric's LP had a slimmer neck than Peter's '59. Peter said his '59 had a neck like a tree trunk, and Eric's was more playable.![]()
Lewguitar said:I paid about $400 to $800 for all of the 50's Les Pauls I owned. Except for my '56...that one I traded a Fender Jaguar for. I don't own any of those guitars any more though. Lew
gOgIver said:IIRC you once said the Jag was to "plinky" for you?