uOpt
Something Cool
Re: Confused On Gibson Weight Relief
I do not directly contest your research and I am sure your particular 06 is only swiss-cheesed if you say so. But again, I have to warn you that what Gibson customer service reps say is completely useless.
These reps are about $7/hour people with at best some background consisting of liking to play Chinese Strats. They get what they answer on the phone on sheets provided by PR people who are not the ones running around the factory deciding which guitar gets what. These specsheets are very approximate.
Internet forums are full of events where somebody has a certain Gibson on their knees while he is on the phone with one of the Gibson "reps" (which is really a look-up-in-official-documentation monkey) explaining to the caller that the guitar on his lap doesn't exist.
Down on the factory floor decisions are made on a day-to-day basis. Old half-build guitar parts are made into current model guitars, retaining some of the old characteristics. Down on the floor people probably have never seen those spec sheets that the customer rep quotes on the phone, and they don't know they aren't supposed to make a SG std body from more than 2 pieces, and then they do.
The randomness is part of the charm of buying Gibsons and hey if it's too perfect it's probably a Chinese fake. But going around quoting their reps is useless.
OK. But if you truly got it from the LP Forum, there's a thread about it on page 2, I think. There's a reason I keep thanking my lucky stars that I went ahead and bought another LP in '06 before all that crap started.
Doublecut Standards are chambered back to at least '98. I have one of those, as well. Maybe that's where the idea came from, I don't know, and I'm not sure anyone knows. I've gotten lots of answers as to the reason why. Everything from poor wood availability to complaints about weight of LPs (which I call BS on).
There's also a thread about it on the Marshall forum which includes an email from a Gibson customer service rep. I've seen similar emails to a couple of music stores I frequent.
As far as the reps go, the only misinformation from Gibson was not telling people up front they were going to start the chambering. They didn't even market LPs as being chambered. If it was such a revolutionary idea, why didn't they? The routing fairies just kind of came in the middle of the night. Whatever.
I found out from a buddy of mine who owns a store. He told me it was going to happen when I bought mine (his rep told him), and then the Gibson guys confirmed it when we saw them 5 months later.
I'm certain also that my next LP will be a Custom, 59 VOS, or Traditional.
I do not directly contest your research and I am sure your particular 06 is only swiss-cheesed if you say so. But again, I have to warn you that what Gibson customer service reps say is completely useless.
These reps are about $7/hour people with at best some background consisting of liking to play Chinese Strats. They get what they answer on the phone on sheets provided by PR people who are not the ones running around the factory deciding which guitar gets what. These specsheets are very approximate.
Internet forums are full of events where somebody has a certain Gibson on their knees while he is on the phone with one of the Gibson "reps" (which is really a look-up-in-official-documentation monkey) explaining to the caller that the guitar on his lap doesn't exist.
Down on the factory floor decisions are made on a day-to-day basis. Old half-build guitar parts are made into current model guitars, retaining some of the old characteristics. Down on the floor people probably have never seen those spec sheets that the customer rep quotes on the phone, and they don't know they aren't supposed to make a SG std body from more than 2 pieces, and then they do.
The randomness is part of the charm of buying Gibsons and hey if it's too perfect it's probably a Chinese fake. But going around quoting their reps is useless.