Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

jonathane40

New member
Hi, I have searched on google and on several forums to answer this questions and I am still confused. Most of the comparisons that i have read deal mainly with the difference in design and schematics; I am more interested in their difference tonewise.

I currently have a 5F1A with a 12' speaker, and have never played a 5E3 amp. Recently, I have seen and played a few pedals that claim to emulate the champ 5E3 tone. This got me wondering about the difference in tone between the 5F1A and 5E3.

Thanks for your time.
cheers,
Jon
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

They have very little in common to my ears...

Tweed Champs are single ended true class A amps and even with a bigger cab and speaker they lack low end and punch in a lot of settings plus the lack of a tone control makes then rather bright and wirey on top.

A 5E3 Deluxe is much bigger and more bold sounding, has better cleans and crunhy IMO and even though a 5E3 is flubby on bottom and still is an old design that puts out 12 watts they are still much more robust sounding.

I'm also not sure what you are saying about the pedals that emulate Champ 5E3 tone...there is a Champ and there is a 5e3 but they are not the same amps...
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

The 5F1 has no tone control and as such has much higher gain. Just compare the later Champs to the tweeds and the biggest change to the sound is the addition of the tone control.
Plus 5 watts vs. 12 watts - definitely going to sound different.
 
Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Thanks! That was helpful. I meant 5E3 Tweed, not champ. Sorry for the confusion. I am going to modify that on the post.

For some reason I always mix up the terms tweed and champ in my head.

I can see what you mean when you say 5F1A can be too bright. Mine I think is based on a 5F2A (same with a tone knob right?). So I can imagine a 5F1A would sound similar to mine with the tone at max.

I think it would be helpful for me to find clips to hear the difference. Can you, or anybody else think of songs that were recorded with these two amps that would allow me to hear some of the differences?

Thanks again,
Jon
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

The 5F1 has no tone control and as such has much higher gain. Just compare the later Champs to the tweeds and the biggest change to the sound is the addition of the tone control.
Plus 5 watts vs. 12 watts - definitely going to sound different.

2 things about this post rub me the wrong way...

You can't generalize abot the lack of a tone control in teh champ causing it to have more gain simply based on the lack of a tone control.

It is true that if you had a tweed champ stock and one with an added tone control the stock version would have more gain but in this case you compared 2 completely different preamps to one another which just doesn't work.

Also, the 5 vs 12 (which is actually more like 3 vs 12) giving the amps a differnet sound is wrong...a watt has nothing do to with the tone of the amp in the way you said it does. You could build a 5E3 preamp and attach it to a champ power section or a Marshall Major power section and the basic tone woudl still be the same...
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Thanks! That was helpful. I meant 5E3 Tweed, not champ. Sorry for the confusion. I am going to modify that on the post.

For some reason I always mix up the terms tweed and champ in my head.

I can see what you mean when you say 5F1A can be too bright. Mine I think is based on a 5F2A (same with a tone knob right?). So I can imagine a 5F1A would sound similar to mine with the tone at max.

I think it would be helpful for me to find clips to hear the difference. Can you, or anybody else think of songs that were recorded with these two amps that would allow me to hear some of the differences?

Thanks again,
Jon

Gotcha.

Yes the 5F2A is a tweed Princeton circiut, which is more or less the same as a tweed Champ but with a tone control. If you crank the tone to 12 on your Princeton is will be pretty close to a Champ, not the same but very close.

Clips...well, i'm not too sure about things recorded for sure with a tweed Champ but the 5E3 is the main amp of Neil Young for one, Larry Carlton used a 5E3 on a lot (most) of the stuff he did with Steely Dan, all 3 guitar player sin the Eagels used 5E3's a good bit at various times, Rich Robinson loves to record with them or use a pair of them live...there are more but those come to mind.

There are loads of clips on UTOOB that might help you out.
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

They have very little in common to my ears...

Tweed Champs are single ended true class A amps and even with a bigger cab and speaker they lack low end and punch in a lot of settings plus the lack of a tone control makes then rather bright and wirey on top.

A 5E3 Deluxe is much bigger and more bold sounding, has better cleans and crunhy IMO and even though a 5E3 is flubby on bottom and still is an old design that puts out 12 watts they are still much more robust sounding.

I'm also not sure what you are saying about the pedals that emulate Champ 5E3 tone...there is a Champ and there is a 5e3 but they are not the same amps...

What he said!

BTW Lovepedal Les Lius can deliver quite similar tones through my US Blues Jr. when eq'd right.

B
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

2 things about this post rub me the wrong way...

You can't generalize abot the lack of a tone control in teh champ causing it to have more gain simply based on the lack of a tone control.

It is true that if you had a tweed champ stock and one with an added tone control the stock version would have more gain but in this case you compared 2 completely different preamps to one another which just doesn't work.

Also, the 5 vs 12 (which is actually more like 3 vs 12) giving the amps a differnet sound is wrong...a watt has nothing do to with the tone of the amp in the way you said it does. You could build a 5E3 preamp and attach it to a champ power section or a Marshall Major power section and the basic tone woudl still be the same...

Compare a tweed Champ (5F1) to the later Blackface and Silverface models. The biggest change is the addition of the tone (Treble and Bass) controls to the circuit. The result is a significant reduction in the preamp stage gain. I have a SF Champ and I've played a Tweed. They're very different because of this. A common mod to the BF/SF Champs is to bypass the tone control in the circuit, leading to a much higher gain and more "tweed-y" sound.
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Thanks, I thought Neil Young was an example of 5E3 amp. Nice! And a good example of a recording made using a 5F1 would be Clapton's Layla?

I will listen to the other bands that you mentioned and see the difference that i start noticing. I have to keep in mind that different rigs and instruments will also have a huge influence in tone.

If i have time next week, i should try to find a store that has a 5E3 and 5F1A to compare. It might ultimately be the best test.

thanks and hope you are all enjoying the weekend,
Jon
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

dr. barlo, i was interested in trying the les lius, however it is out of production and have not seen one on ebay. Anyways, I recently got a catalinbread formula no. 5 and like it a lot. This pedal was based on the sound of a 5E3 circuit. However, i compared it to my 5F2A cranked and both sound very similar.

cheers,
Jon
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Jon - a Tweed Princeton (5F2-A) driving a 12" speaker in a decent sized cab can sound similar to a Tweed Deluxe (5E3), at least in terms of a pedal trying to simulate the "Tweed tone". TheGuyWhoInventedFire hit the high points of the differences in sound. The Deluxe has a bigger sound, more clean headroom but at high volume gets nastier/crunchier a la' Neil Young. The Tweed Princeton can sound really sweet at lower volumes, but it's never really clean. I'd bet that parts of "Layla" were recorded with a Tweed Princeton, but can prove it. Also the single-ended Princeton has less defined/flabbier bass regardless of speaker/cab.

Compare a tweed Champ (5F1) to the later Blackface and Silverface models. The biggest change is the addition of the tone (Treble and Bass) controls to the circuit. The result is a significant reduction in the preamp stage gain. I have a SF Champ and I've played a Tweed. They're very different because of this. A common mod to the BF/SF Champs is to bypass the tone control in the circuit, leading to a much higher gain and more "tweed-y" sound.

Apologies for the following rant. It just drives me crazy when someone looks at a couple of schematics without understanding how the entire circuit of an amp together with the components used to make that circuit a reality contribute to the tone.

As Christian said, you can't just state that "adding tone controls" does X. There are lots of other differences between the circuits being named here.

Sure, the 5E1 (classic Tweed Champ circuit) does not have a tone control of any kind. The 5F2-A (narrow panel Tweed Princeton) has a single tone control similar to the "tone" control on your guitar. It's a treble cut. Period. Relatively low loss.

The Blackface Fenders have a form of "TMB" tone circuit. Treble, Mids, Bass. Much lower signal loss is the tradeoff for having more control over the frequency output. You say "Wait! The Blackface Champ doesn't have a Mid control!" Sure it does - it's permanenly set at 6.8K, just like the Normal channel on all of the two channel Blackface Fenders.

But the Blackface Champ also has a cathode bypass cap on the second gain stage after the tone stack which boosts that stage's gain dramatically. Why is it cleaner than a Tweed Champ then? It's not so much the preamp circuit, although that contributes to it. The Blackface Champ has a different level of negative feedback which is used to control the accuracy (i.e. lack of distortion) in the power amp. Fender was going for clean tone and more headroom in the '60s, so the output transformer is bigger, the speaker is bigger, the voltages are higher, etc.

The Tweed Deluxe (5E3) is a completely different amp from the single-ended Champs. The difference in wattage output may be irrelevant, but a single-ended amp with 1 power tube cannot sound like a push-pull amp with 2 (or 4) power tubes driven by a phase inverter. They are totally different circuits. Sure, cab size and speaker size make a difference, but the circuits are so different before you even start talking about components that naming tone controls as the deciding factor is silly. Also, the Tweed Deluxe has a Tweed tone control on each channel, i.e. a treble cut just like the Tween Princeton.

I'll stop carrying on. If you can read a schematic, look at the 5E3 "narrow panel" Tweed Deluxe and then look at the 5F2-A Tweed Princeton. They both have a power transformer, an on/off switch, an output transformer (although quite different parts), tubes, resistors and capacitors. Oh, and similar tone controls and both use a 5Y3 rectifier tube. Get the point?

On a trivial note, there never was a "5F1A" circuit to the best of my knowledge.

Chip
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Jon - a Tweed Princeton (5F2-A) driving a 12" speaker in a decent sized cab can sound similar to a Tweed Deluxe (5E3), at least in terms of a pedal trying to simulate the "Tweed tone". TheGuyWhoInventedFire hit the high points of the differences in sound. The Deluxe has a bigger sound, more clean headroom but at high volume gets nastier/crunchier a la' Neil Young. The Tweed Princeton can sound really sweet at lower volumes, but it's never really clean. I'd bet that parts of "Layla" were recorded with a Tweed Princeton, but can prove it. Also the single-ended Princeton has less defined/flabbier bass regardless of speaker/cab.



Apologies for the following rant. It just drives me crazy when someone looks at a couple of schematics without understanding how the entire circuit of an amp together with the components used to make that circuit a reality contribute to the tone.

As Christian said, you can't just state that "adding tone controls" does X. There are lots of other differences between the circuits being named here.

Sure, the 5E1 (classic Tweed Champ circuit) does not have a tone control of any kind. The 5F2-A (narrow panel Tweed Princeton) has a single tone control similar to the "tone" control on your guitar. It's a treble cut. Period. Relatively low loss.

The Blackface Fenders have a form of "TMB" tone circuit. Treble, Mids, Bass. Much lower signal loss is the tradeoff for having more control over the frequency output. You say "Wait! The Blackface Champ doesn't have a Mid control!" Sure it does - it's permanenly set at 6.8K, just like the Normal channel on all of the two channel Blackface Fenders.

But the Blackface Champ also has a cathode bypass cap on the second gain stage after the tone stack which boosts that stage's gain dramatically. Why is it cleaner than a Tweed Champ then? It's not so much the preamp circuit, although that contributes to it. The Blackface Champ has a different level of negative feedback which is used to control the accuracy (i.e. lack of distortion) in the power amp. Fender was going for clean tone and more headroom in the '60s, so the output transformer is bigger, the speaker is bigger, the voltages are higher, etc.

The Tweed Deluxe (5E3) is a completely different amp from the single-ended Champs. The difference in wattage output may be irrelevant, but a single-ended amp with 1 power tube cannot sound like a push-pull amp with 2 (or 4) power tubes driven by a phase inverter. They are totally different circuits. Sure, cab size and speaker size make a difference, but the circuits are so different before you even start talking about components that naming tone controls as the deciding factor is silly. Also, the Tweed Deluxe has a Tweed tone control on each channel, i.e. a treble cut just like the Tween Princeton.

I'll stop carrying on. If you can read a schematic, look at the 5E3 "narrow panel" Tweed Deluxe and then look at the 5F2-A Tweed Princeton. They both have a power transformer, an on/off switch, an output transformer (although quite different parts), tubes, resistors and capacitors. Oh, and similar tone controls and both use a 5Y3 rectifier tube. Get the point?

On a trivial note, there never was a "5F1A" circuit to the best of my knowledge.

Chip

You would agree though, that Paris is the capital of France, wouldn't you?
 
Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

Wow! Chip, thanks for such a thorough explanation. I understand the differences between these amps much better now. I do not know how to read a wiring diagram or schematic though, but am planing on learning in the near future.

About the 5F1a, I think you are right. I guess i just got confused with the A in the 5F2A.

Thanks for your help,
Jon
 
Re: Difference between 5F1A and 5E3 (Tonewise)

dr. barlo, i was interested in trying the les lius, however it is out of production and have not seen one on ebay. Anyways, I recently got a catalinbread formula no. 5 and like it a lot. This pedal was based on the sound of a 5E3 circuit. However, i compared it to my 5F2A cranked and both sound very similar.

cheers,
Jon

Hi,

Like that pedal quite a lot. And to be honest, I do not have any 5E3's around that I could AB (with either a Marshall Plexi or a Dumble ODS clone) Les Lius with a real deal Tweed Deluxe. I used to own one like back 7 8 years ago, maybe even more... And the pedal reminds me to that 5E3 I used to have. But maybe it is all wishful thinking... I don't think it is, though.

Anyways, like that pedal...

BTW am not familiar with CB's Formula No.5 at all.

B
 
Back
Top