papersoul said:I hear this a lot from guys who have been playing for years that the older JBs had something different in its tone and output. Are there any here who have experienced this? Were the older JBs hand wound? Lower output? I have heard some measuring in the 14k range.
papersoul said:That is a good point and maybe that is why some like the old JBs they find rather than new ones.
roadstar II said:i guess it is like the older original paf's everyone and thier mother clones them but no one ever nailed it? why?
why in the world cant say duncan or even dimarzio just take a old original disect it and dupe it and wind up with the same exact tone???
maybe the wire used back then was a lot different? or the magnet was a different composite?
i dont really know i am just taking guesses?
Luke Duke said:The problem with PAF's is there are so many styles to clone. Gibson was everything BUT consistent with the originals. So you've got to ask:
What magnet?
What resistance?
What wire gauge?
To YOU the perfect PAF might be a A5 neck pup wound to 8.0K with 42 gauge formvar wire
but....
To ME the perfect PAF is an A2 neck pup wound to 7.5 with 41 gauge wire.
Luke
roadstar II said:and my perfect paf is the one that has the classic mojo tone but more drive and harmonics?
vitrual hot paf?
paf pro?
breed neck?
demon?
duncan blues model?
pearly gates?
damn i wish i had the cash to buy them all!![]()
That would be the difference. They talked about at the UGD about how they specially age some pickups. But I would say it is the age of the pickup magnet also.roadstar II said:wouldnt they have seasoned magnets?
you know a aged magnet to change the tone?
1984 JB= 21 year old magnet
2005 JB = brand new magnet
dani said:may be my ears but i find my early 90s jb sound just a slight tad rounder than my '04 jb while output is similar though. fwiw, both pickups was installed in the same guitar and recorded with the same amp settings. only difference is one is a trembucker and the other normal-spaced.