Masta' C
Well-known member
I'm not confused about anything, and if you want to be the misconception police then start with your own commentary. I remember what I read about it a few years back so I'm not mistaken. It's pretty clear from the description I quoted directly from Dimarzio that the AT-1 and PAF 36 share a similar pedigree. I'm not interested in arguing semantics but I don't find your pedantics amusing.
It really doesn't matter because I own and play all 3 of them, among many other Dimarzios, Duncans, and several other brands. My descriptions are accurate and my assessments are sound. If you disagree then OK, you have that freedom. Personally, I'd rather contest something that matters.
So, your unfounded recollection trumps facts? Ok...
Just checked and, according to DiMarzio's own website, the AT-1 was designed in 2001. The 36th was designed in 2008.
Most of us that were around at that time know that the 36th replaced the Virtual "Hot" PAF in their lineup. The 36th and AT-1 did hit retail shelves around the same time (2008-09), as the AT-1 was previously only available on Andy Timmons' signature Ibanez guitar. This is why their "part numbers" are so close (DP223 vs DP224), but the AT-1 was definitely created many years before the 36th was ever thought of.
Without getting into the physical differences between an 8.6K "PAF" style pickup and a 16.5K high output humbucker that prevent one from being just a "tweaked" version of the other, if you can't fathom that the two are unrelated aside from the "Virtual Vintage" and "Airbucker" construction methods, why don't you write DiMarzio and get an "official" answer instead of turning this into a blind argument full of personal attacks based solely on your memory?
Last edited: