Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimibetan
  • Start date Start date
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

SSS is a completely different animal than HH, that's a whole other can of worms.

If what you want in your neck humbucker is articulate, the 36th is fine. There are other things that go farther in that direction, i.e. a more clear high end OR less low end clutter or both. Here's sort of a list if articulate neck humbucker is what you want:

DiMarzio Super 2: Not really paired with a Norton bridge, but if you have a searing hot bridge like X2n, Super 3, etc, this will still more than keep up with it and then some. Extremely high output but with a big low end roll off that keeps it from becoming anywhere near as muddy as other high output buckers can be in the neck.

PAF Joe: Less muddy version of the PAF Pro designed specifically for the neck position. Still not what I'd call real articulate in the low end, but definitely moreso than other medium powered buckers that have been thrown around as neck position solutions (PAF Pro, Air Norton, Breed Neck). If you were going to get a PAF Pro, I'd get this instead. I switched out a PAF Pro for a PAF Joe in one of my guitars neck positions and it improved the clarity a LOT without sacrificing output. I ended up switching the PAF Joe for a Smit's Buckerlite and the result is F'ing amazing.

Duncan Jazz: Very clear on the high notes, can have almost single coil like articulation. Still somewhat boomy in the low end, you can somewhat cure that by backing that side off quite a bit.

Duncan Full Shred Neck: Similar to Jazz but a hair clearer.

DiMarzio EJ Special Neck: Similar to Jazz or Full Shred but another step more clear and less muddy.

DiMarzio Humbucker from Hell: Not nearly as "single coil-like" as DiMarzio claims, but another step more clear than an EJ Special neck and 2 steps more clear than the jazz. Not really noticeably more high end, but less boomy in the low end. Lows still don't have the single coil thwack and articulation on low notes but are very woody sounding and not boomy. HFH uses 41 ga. wire so don't let the sub 6k DCR fool you, the output is on par or slightly more than a PAF.

Smit's HWP Buckerlite: Somewhat similar to the DiM HFH. In the normal winding it has less highs than the HFH so is fatter in the high notes, but also has less lows and is less boomy in the lows. I'd describe it as very even across the spectrum, it is neither bright nor muddy in any way. He'll also adjust the wind or magnet to preference; I've had him wind me a 5.5K version and a 3k version. Larger wire is used here, larger still on the 3k, so again, don't let the DCR fool you. DCR is not output. The output is on par with any PAF.

Smit's HWP "Stealth Mini": This is something that isn't on his site but that I've had him make for me a couple times. It is a mini bucker that sits under a hole-less full sized cover and mounts in a full sized humbucker route. Sound depends on wind, but I've had the normal neck mini he makes done that way and a much lower wind version. They are both less boomy than commercial full sized buckers in the neck, and the low wind version is extremely articulate Part of this is that the minis "see" a smaller area of the string similar to, but not quite as tight as, a single coil would. Very similar to a Lollar Firebird for the lower wind version, but it fits and looks right in a normal sized route.

Lollar El Rayo: 40 ga. wire, 3.6k DCR, again, output is on par with a PAF. Bright and non-muddy.

Reminder: DCR is not output. Don't be fooled by low DCR numbers and think output is low. The Super 2 is ridiculously high output with a DCR under 9k. Humbucker from Hell is PAF output or slightly more with a DCR of about 5.9K. A Buckerlite in normal form has a similar DCR to a HFH, and in the neck is just as loud as the Super 3 I have in the bridge (granted, I keep the buckerlite close to the strings, but the Super 3 isn't backed off into the wood either). Low DCR on a neck pickup tells you either there aren't a ton of turns on the bobbins or a larger gauge wire is being used, either of those things leads to a more clear, less muddy tone in the neck position.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

Paul uses Areas and Injectors now, which are legitimately tight pickups on low notes. I wouldn't consider Satriani's neck pickup tone articulate on low notes, although his whole tone has become better in recent years. He's using less gain and heavier strings, last time I saw G3 his tone and ability to cut the mix and hear each note were much, much better than Vai's and whoever else he was playing with, can't even recall.

Paul also used to use Humbucker from Hell, sometimes in parallel wiring, which was THE STANDARD for non-muddy neck humbucker at the time. Several orders of magnitude tighter than a PAF Pro in the neck.

You should do some comparing. There are a whole lot of pickups that hold together in that range a whole lot better than a PAF Pro. If you do a fast picked run starting low on the E string, most humbuckers make it sound like a wall of indistinguishable mud until you pass A 220 or so. I've experienced it my self for years and seen it when a lot of the people you probably listen to play live and try to play in that range; they may as well be playing random chromatic junk since no one could tell the difference. No articulation, no cut, just mush.

Do the same thing with a single coil type pickup and the notes are clear and defined. It isn't about output, it's about low end content. Same applies in an amplifier. A lot of amps have mushy undefined lows because the designer tried to push too much low end too early in the gain staging. Most humbuckers have too much low end content in the neck position to be clear on low notes.

It's only in the last few years I think anyone has been making a humbucker that would let you start a fast picked run on say F# on your low E and be able to hear each note clearly. PAF Pro certainly is not one of the pickups that are capable of that, unless maybe you are using a whole heckuva lot of high end in your tone.

We don't need to discuss Paul or Joe's change in gear since they probably change gear for reasons beyond yours or my knowledge. That's beside the point. You can argue about it if you want, but the fact remains that the PAF Pro is a top choice for many lead guitarists, and it's not a "muddy" pickup as you characterize it. Perhaps it's not the most articulate pickup in the world, but it's not a "muddy" pickup no matter which way you slice it.

Muddiness depends on a lot of things. Dimarzio pickups are typically mid range heavy. Put them through an amp with a lot of mids or bass and you might get a muddy sound. Usually when there is too much of something in the EQ, it can become a muddy mess. Gain, compression, etc... can all affect clarity, so that doesn't translate to the PAF Pro being "muddy." I'm sorry, but it's just not the case man.

This is getting more interesting... Now I'm thinking if I'm going for HH or SSS... The Area 67/67/61 combo might be another option for more articulation but it wont be the kind of tone that I'm looking for.

Well it depends. I personally prefer humbuckers in my strats and, in fact, have converted ALL of them to HH. I have been using many single size humbuckers for a long time, but I eventually preferred the output and thickness of humbuckers.

There are a lot of options for an SSS strat, if you want to go that route. I HIGHLY recommend the STK-S9 as it's a beefy single size bucker with an A5 magnet. In my opinion, it's THE best single bucker that Duncan makes. That would cover your bridge position. For middle position, there's no question that the Duckbucker rules. Then for neck, well there are many options.

Since you were initially inquiring about Dimarzios, I would suggest the Virtual Solo, Heavy Blues and Heavy Blues II for an SSS configuration. The Chopper is also outstanding and you can install one in the bridge and neck.

If you don't choose to change your path, the Norton pairs up well with a lot of pickups. The Air Classic neck is also a good choice, but you should look into the Bluesbucker. That's one pickup that doesn't get talked about enough. It sounds like something that would be just right for you. It's an amazing pickup but not your typical neck humbucker. It would be a great match for the Norton, and it will give you a lot of versatility without driving your amp too hard.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

and it's not a "muddy" pickup as you characterize it. Perhaps it's not the most articulate pickup in the world, but it's not a "muddy" pickup no matter which way you slice it.

That's just semantics. It does what I described it as doing in on low notes. You can call it "weraoipujetr" if you don't like the term "muddy", doesn't change the fact. Say what you will but there are a LOT of less, and quite a bit less, muddy neck humbuckers out there. If it floats your boat to call them "tighter" instead of "less muddy", have at it.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

DiMarzio EJ Special Neck: Similar to Jazz or Full Shred but another step more clear and less muddy.

DiMarzio Humbucker from Hell: Not nearly as "single coil-like" as DiMarzio claims, but another step more clear than an EJ Special neck and 2 steps more clear than the jazz. Not really noticeably more high end, but less boomy in the low end. Lows still don't have the single coil thwack and articulation on low notes but are very woody sounding and not boomy. HFH uses 41 ga. wire so don't let the sub 6k DCR fool you, the output is on par or slightly more than a PAF.

Interesting! I always assumed the EJ would be the more single coil-ish of the two, given the lower output rating listed on Dimarzio's site. Personally, I can see the PAF Joe working well with the Norton, although I may go all the way for a Lindy Fralin P-92 or Unbucker since I want to get it as single coil-ish as possible (I think the Twangmaster might be too far that way in a basswood body with 500K pots).

My mahogany body/maple top Ibanez has a PAF Pro neck mated with a Tone Zone bridge and that is absolutely an amazing combo!
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

I think I will go for the Norton/PAF Joe combo... 500k pots and .022 caps will do just fine, right?
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

Lindy Fralin P-92 or Unbucker

Unbucker is just Fralin's way of doing what DiMarzio started years ago with the whole mismatched coils thing. That's like Joe Blow saying he discovered America in 1952......Nice marketing Lindy, way to give credit to Steve Blucher. Not.

I had a P-92 for a while and was wildly disappointed. Didn't sound anything like a P-90 or a single coil, it sounded like a low-wind PAF. If you want a hummer that comes closer to a single, get an adapter ring for $7 off ebay and put in a Lollar Firebird neck, or call Kevin at Smit's HWP and get a stealth mini at about a 6k wind. Drop my name he'll know what you mean. The P-92 doesn't even come close to either of those.

500k pots yes. .022uf? Sure, if you like your guitar to sound like the amp is burried in the yard when you turn it down. I like .0022uf. Try it, you'l see what I mean.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

500k pots yes. .022uf? Sure, if you like your guitar to sound like the amp is burried in the yard when you turn it down. I like .0022uf. Try it, you'l see what I mean.

What if .047, I see them on SD wiring diagrams for HBs?
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

Unbucker is just Fralin's way of doing what DiMarzio started years ago with the whole mismatched coils thing. That's like Joe Blow saying he discovered America in 1952......Nice marketing Lindy, way to give credit to Steve Blucher. Not.

I had a P-92 for a while and was wildly disappointed. Didn't sound anything like a P-90 or a single coil, it sounded like a low-wind PAF. If you want a hummer that comes closer to a single, get an adapter ring for $7 off ebay and put in a Lollar Firebird neck, or call Kevin at Smit's HWP and get a stealth mini at about a 6k wind. Drop my name he'll know what you mean. The P-92 doesn't even come close to either of those.

500k pots yes. .022uf? Sure, if you like your guitar to sound like the amp is burried in the yard when you turn it down. I like .0022uf. Try it, you'l see what I mean.
Actually, Gibson invented the mismatched humbucker by accident. Pickup makers were talking about this when they measured PAFs years ago. Gibson designed the humbucker to be 2 matched coils, but (like Fender) weren't too good at counting turns. Nowhere on Fralins site does he claim to have invented this.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

But, accidentally mismatching numbers of turns is not the same as designing each coil to have a different resonant peak using different gauges of wire. I think most would credit DiMarzio for bringing that "dual resonance" thing to widespread use.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

But, accidentally mismatching numbers of turns is not the same as designing each coil to have a different resonant peak using different gauges of wire. I think most would credit DiMarzio for bringing that "dual resonance" thing to widespread use.

Exactly.

Nowhere on Fralins site does he claim to have invented this.

Nowhere does he give credit to the guy who did. But he does act like it's some kind of super special secret sauce he came up with, and it isn't. That part of his marketing struck me as being as over the top as Chris Kinman's usual epoch shattering hyperbole.
 
Re: Dimarzio Norton + 36th Anniv PAF + Strat = Good?

Exactly.



Nowhere does he give credit to the guy who did. But he does act like it's some kind of super special secret sauce he came up with, and it isn't. That part of his marketing struck me as being as over the top as Chris Kinman's usual epoch shattering hyperbole.
I dont recall ever seeing Seymour Duncan credit Barden for inventing the rail pickup or Dimarzio for inventing the single coil-size humbucker, either...
 
Back
Top