Destructone
New member
i am very intrigued by this pickup. does anyone have experience in using this pickup? how would you compare it to the emg 81 and the super distortion?
tnx!
tnx!
Destructone said:i am very intrigued by this pickup. does anyone have experience in using this pickup? how would you compare it to the emg 81 and the super distortion?
tnx!
Texas Swamp said:Compared to the 81, it has mids and might slighty dirty your amp on the clean channel.
This is exactly how I'd describe it. Nothing wrong with it, but I think the X2N might be where the "DiMarzios are made for heavy signal processing" rumor came from.Empty Pockets said:...it's LOUD and no frequency really stands out...it's EQ is almost flat...
Wattage said:I didn't like the high end using that pup everything seemed squashed.
Colma said:X2N sounds great, i have no problems getting cleans with it, i use it in both bridge + neck position of my main guitar right now![]()
revolution said:You know that pickup originally was created as kind of a gag. Someone at Dimarzio got cute and was trying to be funny by buliding a big massive ceramic mag pup and it worked...the X2N was born!
maybe put the neck version in the bridge?ranalli said:I personally think the X2N is a great sounding pickup. Very balanced, very clear and just good tone IMO. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it was too much output for me. I don't really use the bridge for cleans but even still this was just too much for me.
If they made the same pickup but with just lower output....I'd have kept it.
But for all out metal?? Great pickup.