Dimarzio X2N...

Destructone

New member
i am very intrigued by this pickup. does anyone have experience in using this pickup? how would you compare it to the emg 81 and the super distortion?

tnx!
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

Destructone said:
i am very intrigued by this pickup. does anyone have experience in using this pickup? how would you compare it to the emg 81 and the super distortion?

tnx!

Compared to the 81, it has mids and might slighty dirty your amp on the clean channel.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

Texas Swamp said:
Compared to the 81, it has mids and might slighty dirty your amp on the clean channel.

how about muddiness... i find the 81 to be very clear under high-gain, even clearer than evolutions... is this also the case with the X2N, or is it overly muddy?
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

I was actually wondering about the X2N also, but compared to an Sh-6 Duncan Distortion that I own and love. I play a lot melodic power metal stuff mixed in with punk... is one more versatile and clean up better than the other?
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

I haven't heard them but i really want to try one. Most people who have posted about it here say it's LOUD and no frequency really stands out...it's EQ is almost flat so that's kinda cool.

I read on another forum that it matches really well with a Super D in the neck.

-X
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

It's a rather balanced-sounding pickup, but be prepared for massive compression, it will almost play itself, lol.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

Steve Vai used an X2N on the Alcatrazz record... I had one in a Les Paul for years and years and it was pretty good. I thought it was a cool PU. I can't explain it in great detail because I sold that guitar in '89. I can remember the PU cut through good in a band situation and sounded good with a horrible Randall amp I had at the time. Pretty damn hot, it picked up a lot of string noise and stuff.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

X2N

the pickup of the 80's aimed at making mid gain amps distort into high heavens. still does it wonderfully today.
it's pretty compressed sounding though. whether you like that or no, you have to decide for yourself
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

Empty Pockets said:
...it's LOUD and no frequency really stands out...it's EQ is almost flat...
This is exactly how I'd describe it. Nothing wrong with it, but I think the X2N might be where the "DiMarzios are made for heavy signal processing" rumor came from.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

DESTRUCTONE PLEASE tell me how you like the EVOs in your PRS CU22 and the Tone Zone PAF PRO in your IBZ

Opinions? Reviews?
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

My fav X2N sound is Fast Eddie Clarke's old Motorhead Strat. I had one in my BC Rich Ironbird but it wasn't for me, far too compressed at least compared to the Bill Lawrence stuff I had been using. I didn't like the high end using that pup everything seemed squashed. I didn't have the knowledge or resources available to me at the time to realize how I could have tweaked it but I have nevered longed to try anohter.

I switched over to Duncans shortly after that and been using them ever since so I guess I owe the X2N a debt of gratitude.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

X2N sounds great, i have no problems getting cleans with it, i use it in both bridge + neck position of my main guitar right now :D
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

Colma said:
X2N sounds great, i have no problems getting cleans with it, i use it in both bridge + neck position of my main guitar right now :D
:eek: :scared: :eek2: :wrf:
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

X2N is one of my favorite Pickups. It's most similar to the Invader and slightly less powerful then the Invader (I have no idea why people say the X2N is more powerful then the Invader beucase its NOT!)

The X2N sounds amazing in Les Pauls. And works the best when you have one in the bridge and one in the neck. Great shred tone in the neck spot.

The X2N can do low tuned crap too. but It can kind of get muddy in a Bass wood guitar. They sound the best in Mahagony and Alder.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

I thought it was really warm for a ceramic pickup. I like the tone of those myself. You know that pickup originally was created as kind of a gag. Someone at Dimarzio got cute and was trying to be funny by buliding a big massive ceramic mag pup and it worked...the X2N was born!
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

revolution said:
You know that pickup originally was created as kind of a gag. Someone at Dimarzio got cute and was trying to be funny by buliding a big massive ceramic mag pup and it worked...the X2N was born!

thats pretty cool.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

I personally think the X2N is a great sounding pickup. Very balanced, very clear and just good tone IMO. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it was too much output for me. I don't really use the bridge for cleans but even still this was just too much for me.

If they made the same pickup but with just lower output....I'd have kept it.

But for all out metal?? Great pickup.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

I'd say it's pretty balanced, and does have some compression. But tone curve questions are the wrong attitude. You don't ask "What kind of fuel economy does that Ferrari get?" You ask how fast it goes.

X2N Tone curve? Whatever. But it is Mother ^*%^%#% LOUD!

And while this sounds like its out of the DiMArzio catalog...PArellel and split are very cool and useful tones. The thing is so loud that these less than series setting really do still have some teeth.
 
Re: Dimarzio X2N...

ranalli said:
I personally think the X2N is a great sounding pickup. Very balanced, very clear and just good tone IMO. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it was too much output for me. I don't really use the bridge for cleans but even still this was just too much for me.

If they made the same pickup but with just lower output....I'd have kept it.

But for all out metal?? Great pickup.
maybe put the neck version in the bridge?
 
Back
Top