Even that neck is a compromise between equal temperament (what your tuner shows) and just intonation (what your ear wants to hear).
Play a major third interval (G-B for example). If the two notes are perfectly in tune on a tuner, you will hear "beats" of the frequencies interfering. If you lower the third (B) by 13.7 cents it will ring true. An instrument tuned to just tuning will play great in one key and atrocious in an adjacent key. Equal temperament is a way to make all 12 keys play equally "out of tune".
This is all before you get to the quirks of the guitar design. For example, the lower 3 or 4 strings being wrapped and the highest 2 or 3 being plain. The issues that these necks and nuts try to solve are centuries old, and everything is a compromise. The one benefit is that with recorded music for the past century or so, we have become accustomed to the latest Equal Temperament, so much so that many musicians don't even understand that two notes tuned in a tuner are out of tune with each other. However, in our benefit, many styles we play on guitar heavily rely on bending notes and "blue" notes that don't fall perfectly on the equal temperament scale.
That neck takes the basic equal temperament, factors in the fact that guitarist play in E, A, G, C and D FAR more often than G#, Bb & F#, and tries to correct some of the guitar's natural flaws... Some guitarists will think it's the best thing ever, others will think it's absolutely awful.
So the answer is no, none of us do, no matter how you define it. And, it doesn't really matter since we overcome the limitations with technique and workarounds.