Loops where made for linelevel stuff, that is running parallel...well if it is going to sound any good though!!
Pedals have no buisness in a loop as far as I am concerned, unless something in and output is being added to the pedal, plus correct impedance!
My delay and looping pedals all sound fine in the loop.
It seems like Traynor really messed up the loop on this amp. I've read quite a few complaints online about it. Too bad, the rest of the amp sounds great. You know, there is a distinct possibility that it's the pedals causing the compression of dynamics, especially the multi-fx. Is there a way to completely turn all the effects off to determine if it's any of the effects or if it's just the internal circuitry of the GT? Also, are you losing just volume or true dynamics? (Can you get the same volume using the loop as without it?)
A lot of multi-effect and modeling processors have a switch to convert between instrument-level and line-level (loop) operation. Since equipment can be so variable, it is recommended to try out that switch a few times to see which position is best for your rig.
Messed up??It seems like Traynor really messed up the loop on this amp.
I don't know if the GT-8 has that available....
Messed up??
Maybe they just made it the way they should??
Line level and parallel!!
I think guitar players had a collective blackout....nobody remember the 80's??
Racks, linemixers, CAE ruling the world!!
As Joelap pointed out, the internal signal is at linelevels, and has a different impedance, why degrade that to seriel at mere musiclevels??
That is not going to get one "good" sounds, not if you compare it to how it should be!
My delay and looping pedals all sound fine in the loop.
It seems like Traynor really messed up the loop on this amp. I've read quite a few complaints online about it. Too bad, the rest of the amp sounds great. You know, there is a distinct possibility that it's the pedals causing the compression of dynamics, especially the multi-fx. Is there a way to completely turn all the effects off to determine if it's any of the effects or if it's just the internal circuitry of the GT? Also, are you losing just volume or true dynamics? (Can you get the same volume using the loop as without it?)
You've got to be kidding me... somebody actually made a product that is a tube buffer? Now I've heard it all :chairshot If someone doesnt want it to sound like theyve got pedals in front of their amp, then they shouldnt use pedals! Want to compensate for losses in high frequencies from cable capacitance? Run into a buffered bypass pedal first, like ANY boss pedal. Or better yet, take 8 steps or so, and turn up the knob that says "TEH TREBLE" on your amp! Odds are there wont be a single person in the crowd who can hear through the mix in a band situation who would say "wow, that guitar sounds good, they must be running into a TUBE BUFFER directly after the guitar as to compensate for high frequency attenuation". If you're recording and you want a good accurate sound of just the guitar and amp, run the shortest wire from your guitar straight into the amp. But live, no one is going to be able to tell. No one.
If someone would pay $240 dollars for a BUFFER when they can buy an SD-1 for 30 bucks that'll do the SAME THING (just leave it off), that person should be institutionalized!
It wouldnt matter even if I did, because there'd be no way I'd spend close to $250 on a buffer! And I hope you dont think I was attacking you in my post, I wasn't intending to come across that way. I was just baffled by the idea of a buffer costing $250, since I had never seen that before. In my EE classes, we design unity-gain buffers with 4 resistors, a MOSFet, and anywhere from 1 to 3 capacitors at the most (thats about 3 dollars worth of parts if you're ordering expensive caps)! Since buffers essentially "do nothing" (they convert a high impedance source to low impedance, but dont provide gain or add any sort of change to the signal) that seems like a HECKUVA lot of money to spend on something that isn't going to have any "effect" on the sound. And the whole "tube buffer" thing just struck a nerve with me... There is no advantage to using tubes in such an application to the best of my knowledge. Thats pure marketing to get people to buy it.
It wouldnt matter even if I did, because there'd be no way I'd spend close to $250 on a buffer! And I hope you dont think I was attacking you in my post, I wasn't intending to come across that way. I was just baffled by the idea of a buffer costing $250, since I had never seen that before. In my EE classes, we design unity-gain buffers with 4 resistors, a MOSFet, and anywhere from 1 to 3 capacitors at the most (thats about 3 dollars worth of parts if you're ordering expensive caps)! Since buffers essentially "do nothing" (they convert a high impedance source to low impedance, but dont provide gain or add any sort of change to the signal) that seems like a HECKUVA lot of money to spend on something that isn't going to have any "effect" on the sound. And the whole "tube buffer" thing just struck a nerve with me... There is no advantage to using tubes in such an application to the best of my knowledge. Thats pure marketing to get people to buy it.