astrozombie
KatyPerryologist


Just noticed these epic pits on my explorer’s board. What do you say?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rosewood (and it's related species) do not require oiling. Yes, most of use will wipe down Rosewood boards with something as routine maintenance, but Rosewood will not "dry out" and fall apart if left alone.
Maintaining the proper humidity levels in your home will do more for your guitars than any fretboard conditioner.
My understanding of fretboard maintenance is to wipe fretboard with a small amount of lemon oil or the like, wait a couple of minutes and wipe touch dry. I believe that some woods can go a little soft if they are left wet for too long?
Normal looking Rosewood grain and pores to me.
Rosewood (and it's related species) do not require oiling. Yes, most of use will wipe down Rosewood boards with something as routine maintenance, but Rosewood will not "dry out" and fall apart if left alone.
Maintaining the proper humidity levels in your home will do more for your guitars than any fretboard conditioner.
So you mean that my routine of allowing woodwind bore oil to soak into my rosewood and ebony fretboards for 24 hours at every string change is completely unnecessary? I need to double check that damn book by Dan Earlwine again.
Wow Jeff, while I admire your level of commitment, that would never happen to my guitars,and they are still in great shape.
Yes, over oiling is actually worse than never adding.
Think about this, there are thousands of antiques out there made from Rosewood and they are just fine having never been oiled.
Once, twice a year at the most is all any guitar will ever need.
Don’t soak the board with oil. Just use a little to clean it. You can delaminate the board.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Change those strings :argh:
DOH, nice. Yeah, I do the same thing.
I also didn't read carefullly enough to see that you mentioned Dan Earlwine instead of Dan Erlewine, that's what I get for reading at work.
DOH, nice. Yeah, I do the same thing.
I also didn't read carefullly enough to see that you mentioned Dan Earlwine instead of Dan Erlewine, that's what I get for reading at work.