Edwards Quality...

After asking about an Edwards LP copy, I got a few PM from some of you guys...warning me about the quality of Edwards guitars, after that I made a few phone calls and got mixed reviews...if you guys could tell me anything about the quality of these guitars it would be helpful...I'm not too scared...They are mahogany bodys with deep set mahogany necks(very large mahogany necks), they have 1/2 inch maple caps, good hardware, full size pots, and Seymour Duncan pickups stock...What's wrong with that???
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

i own one of them goldtop replica with p-90s. i must say it is a bang for the buck. build quality can be comparable to gibson. i say 'can be' because gibson is pretty inconsistent in churning out their axes quality-wise. edwards definitely blows epiphone out of the water with its quality and superb playability. the only gripe i have with mine is the weight. kind of light for a lp. may be the fact they are using african or philipines mahogany. finish is immaculate. tone-wise, mine is thick and raunchy. i find the tone is better than my friend's lp studio and so does he. them japanese made guitars do go through tight quality control which the japanese really take pride in. mine came with sd sp-90-1 n/b. and for $600, there's nothing much you can really ask for. maybe tonepros to come as standard.
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

the weight??? that's a plus, man! Only thing which keeps me from owning an LP is the weight. But then the Brian Moore is light, so is the Music Man...and the Brian Moore can clone an LP sound.
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

haha! i like light guitars. but light & lp doesn't really tally does it?
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

I'm finding that like real pauls there heavy and light ones...as far as the tone I can get very close with either my Yamaha SG 2000 or my Moderne...well the Moderne sounds like a Flying V but either way....truth is that I do want the look of a Les Paul and cound never see giving Gibson the pleasure of my money for anything plus I want a Seth in the neck and a Pearly gates in the bridge of something, and I'm out of 2 bucker guitars right now!!! :laugh2:
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

I have an Edwards '56 Gold Top and a 1980 Yamaha SG 2000 as my two main humbucker guitars. The Yamaha blows the Edwards away in terms of sustain and sonority but I prefer the Edwards to most Gibson's I have played. Superb workmanship on the Edwards but it is so light it feels like I am playing a strat! I love Gary Moore's sound and wondered about changing the stock pickups of the Yamaha in order to inch closer to Gary's superb sound. Not keen on Santana's pre-PRS Yamaha sound. The SG2000 at present can lack refinement and sounds just too trebly when sceaming solos are required.
 
Re: Edwards Quality...

+1 on the quality of Edwards, but JeffB had one had some complaints that it not being like a gibson. The Edwards had a different feel to him because he was experienced with gibsons. Most Edwards should have a 59style neck, so if thick is not your thing I would choose something else. It's still not as thick as the RI baseball bat neck, but still pretty close. The tone is great and the weight of mine is around 8 lbs. The only problem after using it a while is that I started to notice that the polepieces were misaligned with the strings, but thats a easy fix. JeffB said something the studs on the tailpiece being higher so he couldn't lower the tailpiece as much. The best is that most come with ABR-1 bridge letting you get a vintage type sound compared to nashville bridge using a bunch of metal. Anyways this guitar ended my Les Paul Goldtop quest, now I just need a Lp with humbuckers. Good luck on finding a good one.
 
Last edited:
Re: Edwards Quality...

Alrighty..finally i can give Christian advice on something!

Pros :bigthumb:

Build quality is superb. Mine had one minor aesthetic issue: some bleed of the black from the headstock onto the side of the stock.

Frets absolutely perfect.
Nut absolutely perfect
Binding pretty much perfect.
Nice Rosewood board (not like the Korean crap you see)
Nitro top with beautiful maple veneer
Super slinky action, just played very very well. I really thought it had 9s on it it played so easy. I put new 10s on and was floored.

Import Klusons were just awesome. Along with the nut, I never had to tune the thing.

I've never seen anything built so well except my hamer and R8. for the $, it's just insane.

Cons :thumbsdow:

Thick satin poly finish everywhere else but the top. Much thicker than my Tokai. Wood grain on the back hardly showed through

Binding is cheesy "faux yellowed vintage"...looks cheap. Its not the right size or thickness...it almost looks like it's painted on.

Studs for Stop TP have a taller lip, so you cannot wind it down to touch the body for a topwrap. I'm not sure this is an issue though as the action is so slinky as it is, I think it would get way too sloppy topwrapped.

Feel: It looks great. It doesn't feel like a Les Paul. At all. It feels kinda cheap. The balance is not right.....it doesn't "hang" the same as the real deal. Mine wasn't too light (8.6 lbs) either. I cannot say for sure, but I believe the body dimensions are a little smaller than a real Les Paul. Some of the Epis I have had felt more like the real deal, some haven't. Basically It feels and plays like a ESP shredder axe or PRS, but is shaped like a Les Paul. My Tokai is closer to the real deal, however it's still not the same either.

I don't think the thick poly back and lacquer top helps. At least it did not on mine. While the guitar was pretty darn resonant, sustain was so-so for a Paula (so much for the long tenon theory). When a JB and 59 are not bright enough, well...

I think this is a sympton of the mahogany that the Japanese and Koreans use. EVERY SINGLE import (recent build, I've not played any vintage Tokais/Grecos, etc) I've had or played, Japanese or Korean..have not had the bright snappy, loud acoustic tone of any American built mahogany guitar I've played. They tend to be dark and muffled. I have a "cheap" Gibson Faded V right now that is still pretty warm sounding but is twice as loud as my imports, much fuller, with better clarity. Night and day. I a/b'ed my Firebird Studio and my old Faded LP standard w/ the Edwards, Tokai, and Epis as well and its the same exact thing.

It could be the poly vs. Nitro. It could be the wood. I'm inclined to believe it's the wood.

For the money they are great. I doubt you'll find a better built instrument for $700 . I would buy another one, but I know what to or not to expect out of it now. It's no Les Paul, but If ya want a beater for a gig, go for it. It's a great playing instrument.
 
Back
Top