Jackson Distortion
New member
Any of you know what might be a similarly eq'd, but equally high powered replacement?
... Well besides that.
If you went back to 9v, the 81 would sound gainier.i like my mustaines better, they are way higher output IMO, too high for my pedals i have to turn the volume pot down quite a ways to get the same gain as the maxed emg 81 (which was modded for 18v btw) i loved the EMGs but the string noise was getting on my nerves big time and wanted something a little more organic (which they are) Im not sure if i will sell the EMGs though because i am so used to them
The ZW Lester comes with an 81b if I'm not mistaken.
The $4k CS Gibson models do.
Raw PowerTheres some Gibson les paul with no finish, cant remember its name right now.
Raw Power
If you went back to 9v, the 81 would sound gainier.
All the 400 level LTD and above come with active EMGs in them unless they're SD models or Alexi Laiho's puny HZ.
lol, that's such a dumb solution. His tone is terrible anyway so I don't know why anyone would ever want to 'emulate' it :laugh2:Well then you must know that the only reason Alexi uses the HZ is because he uses a gain booster, and through his setup actives sound too distorted.
I don't really find many tones out of EMG's not interesting!Marty Friedman's tone with one JB still owns so many hi-gain guitars ,i can't really believe that people still try to go with 81.The 60 is the only EMG i would recommend ,but i never tried the 89 tho.lol, that's such a dumb solution. His tone is terrible anyway so I don't know why anyone would ever want to 'emulate' it :laugh2: