EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

I got to put it through its paces a bit. It is a little more vintage sounding than the 50 watt- both channels clean up a lot better by using the guitars volume control, it's not as compressed as the 50 watt, and seems to have more Marshall growl on the blue channel than the 50 watter.

It seems easier to shred on the 50 watter, maybe they took the gain structure of the 100 watter, since the 50 watter has a tad more gain, at the expense of clarity.

Overall it is clearer and more organic sounding than the 50 watt, if playing them at the same volume level. If you're playing clubs, go with the 50 watter. Playing at home the LbX is better if you're looking for the older van Halen tone at lower volumes. At 15 watts, or 3 watts it's still very loud.

My only complaint is the one speaker output- I with it had 2 for 2 cabinets. I'm wondering if I could use a Y adapter and switch the ohms

Sounds like your impression is pretty favorable!! If someone is looking to join the 5150 III club, would you recommend the LB over the fiddy? Ive already decided that I would go with a fiddy over the big beasty..
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

Sounds like your impression is pretty favorable!! If someone is looking to join the 5150 III club, would you recommend the LB over the fiddy? Ive already decided that I would go with a fiddy over the big beasty..

They serve 2 different purposes,and I like both. If you were looking to "join the club", I'd go with the 50 watt. I love mine, but it's very heavy and bulky to lug around. It has more features, has a clean channel, and can get much louder if you're gigging (it gets VERY loud). The price difference isn't that much. I was looking for a more portable solution to my rig as I tried guitar modelers with studio monitors and the results just weren't cutting it.


The 50 watt is louder and gets the full power tube overdrive at higher volumes and thins out a little at lower volumes, whereas the LBX gets power tube distortion at lower volumes and starts to fart out at louder volumes- in other words the 50 had more headroom. The 50 is a little more compressed and shred friendly, whereas the LBX is closer to VH1. The 50 watt gets good tone at apartment levels, whereas the LBX gets great tone at apartment levels.

The biggest advantage the LBX has over to 50 watt is it's smaller, much lighter and more portable- it's better if you intend to be moving it alot. In my case, I'm looking to downsize my rig and pedalboard after taking a bad fall last year from carrying it down a flight of stairs.

The LBX is still very loud at the 4 watt or 12 watt setting, and you get a bit more power tube distortion at a lower level, so it has a bigger, fuller tone at a lower level than the 50 watt has. The 50 needs to be played at much higher volumes.

Using the 50 watt at home, at home levels, the 50 watt sounds great but can sound a little thin at low levels since it still needs to be cranked a bit. The LBX will give you a fuller power tube tone at lower levels, sounding more like a cranked Marshall on the Blue Channel- similar to my old Marshall JCM 800 2210 but with more gain on tap and more clarity. The 50 has more headroom if you need to play at higher volumes.

I never use the clean green channel on the 50 watt, so I don't miss it, but it's nice to have.

The footswitch on the LBX is more compatable with channel switching functions on most multi effects units, whereas you would need to use MIDI on the 50 watt to control all 3 channels- or use the large footswitch. Then you also have the foot switchable effects loop.

The LBX cleans up better when you turn the guitar volume down. On the 50 watt, you simply switch to the clean channel.

The 100 watter is out of the question, I hear that's not for home use at all it's so loud.
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

I got to put it through its paces a bit. It is a little more vintage sounding than the 50 watt- both channels clean up a lot better by using the guitars volume control, it's not as compressed as the 50 watt, and seems to have more Marshall growl on the blue channel than the 50 watter.

It seems easier to shred on the 50 watter, maybe they took the gain structure of the 100 watter, since the 50 watter has a tad more gain, at the expense of clarity.

Overall it is clearer and more organic sounding than the 50 watt, if playing them at the same volume level. If you're playing clubs, go with the 50 watter. Playing at home the LbX is better if you're looking for the older van Halen tone at lower volumes. At 15 watts, or 3 watts it's still very loud.

My only complaint is the one speaker output- I with it had 2 for 2 cabinets. I'm wondering if I could use a Y adapter and switch the ohms
Jmh151, i originally wanted a used soldano hot rod 25 but even used they are big bucks!
would you say this LBX is kind of like a poor man's HR25 in tone?
I tried a EVH 50 watter and it is too loud for my needs, i just need a good tube amp for at home and low volume playing that does not sound thin and is reminiscent of the hot rod 25
also found the 50 watt to have too much gain for its own good on the red channel.
 
Last edited:
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

I can't say it's a poor mans hot rod 25 as I never played a hot rod 25, but many compare it to the soldano. Except for missing the clean channel, I'm digging the tone of the lbx over my 50 watt- the lbx cleans up better
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

IMO, on paper the Peavey 6150+MH is the better buy. You can go cabless with either analog or USB DI, you get a true clean channel with optional "crunch" boost (and independent pre/post gain knobs for each), power attenuation down to 1 watt, plus a few additional bennies, all for $200 cheaper.

There are several reviews on youtube comparing the Peavey and EVH, and all have said the EVH has a much better, refined tone, whereas the Peavey comes close but instead adds many more features. The EVH feels much more solid and professional, according to the reviewers.

If EVH wasn't coming out with the LBX, I was going to buy the Peavey- but they ended up hitting the stores at the same time.

Not saying one is "better" than the other- the EVH is stripped down and focuses on tone, where the Peavey gets close and packs more features in.
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

My main local music store just got the spec sheets for the new 5150 18 watt lunchbox head that they showed me on Thursday. Looks pretty cool. I don't need it, but may loose all self control and get it with justification that it has the 1/4 power function; so, that I can get the cranked sound at a low volume.

Anyone else seen it?

sounds like this https://youtu.be/WEdH68mSjYE ilove it
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

I have both heads 50 watt and lbx 15 there is a comparison video on my you tube channel where all the settings are exactly the same (even volume).
The lbx blew my mind its very very loud dont be fooled by its size or output rating,ive gigged with the lbx without going through a PA,i had it on 5 and it was fine.
Like somebody else said the blue is clearer and more defined (more growl) it sounds slightly angrier and attacking on the lbx.The difference through a mic though is very slight.I found red to have more gain on the lbx than mini,both great heads love them both........
this is the lbx:
https://youtu.be/WEdH68mSjYE

this is the comparison between mini 50 and lbx 15:
https://youtu.be/02DfLAVUBA4
 
Re: EVH 5150 18 watt lunchbox head

I HAVE THE PEAVEY 6505+ and the peavey 6150 mh imo didnt feel anywhere near as crushing, where as the Evh lbx is just as big sounding as the Evh mini just in a slightly different way.
 
Back
Top