Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Diminished Triad

New member
In a Fender article, the company reported:

Today, most Fender electric instruments use one of two main fingerboard radius measurements. Most prevalent is the modern 9.5” radius (241mm), which was adopted in the 1980s and is now found on about two thirds of Fender electric instruments.

The next most common fingerboard radius, 7.25” (184mm), is a vintage-era spec now used on just under a third of Fender electric instruments. The 7.25” fingerboard radius originated in the early 1950s, and was used for most Fender electric instruments until the 1980s. It never really went away completely, but its prevalence was superseded in the modern era by the slightly more flattened 9.5” radius.


When going through the long list of available Fender guitars (including bass guitars) I find very few still enjoying the 7.25 fingerboard radius. In fact, it seems like this feature is now limited almost exclusively to the American Vintage re-issue line, although I have already found one of those guitars not using the 7.25 but using the 9.5 radius.

Always on the lookout for great 7.25 strats, teles, basses, and other comparable guitars. Doesn't it seem like very, very few new guitars these days have a 7.25 radius (not sure if anything ever made with a lower radius?)...seems like Fender may be the only manufacturer today and from everything online it seems like less than 10% of Fender guitars actually still have 7.25 radius fretboards.

Thanks for any info about this you can share, and if you know any other brand that has a 7.25 radius fingerboard I'd appreciate your sharing this with me.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

I think that 1/3 is all vintage reissues or tribute type guitars.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Yes, I think they are all the AVRI and Classic Series. Are MIM standards 9.5"?

I specifically chose my '62 FSR because it has a 9.5" radius and medium jumbos. I will say my 52RI tele with 7.25" radius is comfy for cowboy chords.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

The Fender AVRI guitars are some of my favorites. Of course a few of the signatures, Gilmour, Blackmore, etc. have the original 7.25 radius. If Hendrix and Nile Rodgers' artist/signature guitars had the original 7.25 radius they did back in the day I would probably get those two guitars too. Fender has modified the fingerboard as they did with the Jeff Beck guitar and increased the radius to 9.5 If the American Vintage sales amount to 1/3 of the company's guitars that is amazing!

Seems like many are buying the relic'd models and very, very few have 7.25 radius boards.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

I thought G&L has a few in 7" , also some Fender Japan models are 7.25" ?

I prefer compound overall, but it's not as if dealing with 7" radius is so difficult; step to a lower string gauge if the higher action really troubles you.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

G&L offers the vintage radius neck as an option on all of its guitars, along with other options such as fret boards, markers, binding, frets, widths, depth and contours. And all of their guitars have about 30 finish options and even flame and quilt maple are avaliable. G&L USA is a Custom Shop, and the guitars are built to order. Find a dealer, and order what you want.

I have Legacy, Comanche, S-500, and Legacy Special models...even a fancy ASAT Deluxe. I prefer their 1-C neck with the 12" radius and medium jumbos. I highly recommend these guitars. I love vintage Strats as much as anybody, but these guitars have some improvements and modern features, all while retaining the vintage vibe. I had a vintage 1960 Strat, but had to sell it 1990. Found G&L and never looked back. There's nothing Fender makes these days that I want.

Check out the guitar company founded by George Fullerton and Leo Fender....G&L.

Bill
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

G&L offers the vintage radius neck as an option on all of its guitars, along with other options such as fret boards, markers, binding, frets, widths, depth and contours. And all of their guitars have about 30 finish options and even flame and quilt maple are avaliable. G&L USA is a Custom Shop, and the guitars are built to order. Find a dealer, and order what you want.

I have Legacy, Comanche, S-500, and Legacy Special models...even a fancy ASAT Deluxe. I prefer their 1-C neck with the 12" radius and medium jumbos. I highly recommend these guitars. I love vintage Strats as much as anybody, but these guitars have some improvements and modern features, all while retaining the vintage vibe. I had a vintage 1960 Strat, but had to sell it 1990. Found G&L and never looked back. There's nothing Fender makes these days that I want.

Check out the guitar company founded by George Fullerton and Leo Fender....G&L.

Bill

Definitely going to spend some serious time on their site and I'd like to one day purchase a Comanche...with a 7ish radius, of course!
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

My 1982 'The Strat' is 7.25". I find the more modern radius to be a lot more playable, actually. But I like flatter fingerboards- up to 16". I can't imagine myself willingly buying a vintage-radius guitar today.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

My 1982 'The Strat' is 7.25". I find the more modern radius to be a lot more playable, actually. But I like flatter fingerboards- up to 16". I can't imagine myself willingly buying a vintage-radius guitar today.

Yes , what Mincer says ~ 12 " - 16" Wayyy better for Speed
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Barre chords are certainly easier on a vintage radius. But I never play a whole song with them- I just don't like the voicing, really. Also, it still hurts after 4 minutes! If you are a player who uses tons of barres, then I can understand the love for a vintage radius. While it makes barre chords easier, I think it makes other types of chords harder.
As far as playing fast, it doesn't seem to hurt Yngwie. But I'm not him, so I need all the help I can get.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

How about if playing barr chords?

Kind of agree with Mincer and I dont write much stuff using them but , I'm extremely used to flat fretboards for years now ~ they dont Impede me much in regards to anything

I think it's spelled Barre Chord
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

I don't perceive that a smaller radius is more comfortable for barre chords or really anything, but that's my fingers. At the same time I wouldn't let it keep me out of a vintage Fender.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Well, the reason barre chords would be 'easier' on a vintage radius is because your index finger remains curved. This is irrelevant if you learned to play them (or are used to playing them) on flatter boards, though.
I will say that a scalloped neck takes away all of my concerns about a vintage radius, though.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Barre chords are certainly easier on a vintage radius. But I never play a whole song with them- I just don't like the voicing, really. Also, it still hurts after 4 minutes! If you are a player who uses tons of barres, then I can understand the love for a vintage radius. While it makes barre chords easier, I think it makes other types of chords harder.
As far as playing fast, it doesn't seem to hurt Yngwie. But I'm not him, so I need all the help I can get.
The rounder the radius, the easier the sweeps, but yes, non-barre chords are a pain to play on vintage radii necks.

I'll take 9.5" and 12" over 7.25 for my main axe any day of the week.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Never put a 7.25" radius neck on a guitar that has a fixed bridge, saddle heights must be adjustable. ( LP for example with the fixed tune-o matic bridge on a 10 0r 12 " radius can get away with non adjustable saddles using just the 2 bridge height screws)
You can slightly raise the outer strings to somewhat remedy fret out ( as long as your frets are tall) if your saddles are adjustable.
Some high end usa customs have compound radius 7.25-9.5 instead of 10-16 compound like warmoths,so if you prefer the vintage feel for easier rhythm / bar chords etc but have issue with fretting out
when bending in the upper frets go with the usa customs or similar compound radius.
 
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Mustang bridges are fixed at 7.25 , but due to physics 7.25" is not the ideal bridge radius for action, even when it corresponds to the neck. I always prefer adjustable saddle action. That said, it doesn't matter terribly, but say a tune-o-matic bridge or Floyd on a 7.25" radius does matter and will play sort of terrible.

A lot of cheap Jacksons use compound radius, as well as more expensive guitars; even then, these don't tend to have Floyds or Tune-O-Matics tuned to the radius.
 
Last edited:
Re: Fender Fingerboard Radius (7.25 vs 9.5 and others)

Well, the reason barre chords would be 'easier' on a vintage radius is because your index finger remains curved. This is irrelevant if you learned to play them (or are used to playing them) on flatter boards, though <-- Yes .
I will say that a scalloped neck takes away all of my concerns about a vintage radius, though.

^^^ Finally doing a scalloped build for myself ( Finished that Blue xmas build ) Been thinking of the Scalloped for 25 yrs for myself
 
Back
Top