Fernandes VH401 (and Sustainer) specs, for those who'd want to know...

freefrog

Well-known member
The VH401 is the pickup sold with the Fernandes Sustainer and "guaranting" this system to work - which I find strange since the spacing between magnetic poles seems a bit too narrow for the Floyd Rose style Fernandes tremolo... Potential reason why the high E string is less reactive than others once the sustainer enabled.

Looks like there's various iterations of the VH401, with hex screw poles or not.

The model that I've tested (in a Fernandes Revolver Pro) has slugs and screw poles, a standard keeper bar and a baseplate grossly painted in black... Potting has apparently been done with bees wax and the magnet looks like a rather thick AlNiCo bar...

DCR in series: 13.5k. Inductance: 7.3H. That's a rather high inductance relatively to the measured DCR.

This pickup has an impressively low parasitic capacitance, giving it a distinctive clarity despite of its high inductance and potted coils. I think I've never measured a so high pitched resonant peak on a so hot humbucker...

I've fitted it with a 4 conductors cable allowing parallel wiring. It lowered a bit the resonance in series but not enough to kill the clarity aforementioned.

I finally prefer this VH401 to the X2N temporarily mounted in the Fernandes Revolver Pro where it was initially.

I think that it would be a great "hot" passive Gibson style HB for other guitars, at least if all models have the same high inductance + low stray capacitance than in the one that I've tested. Main reason why I share my experience...


On the Sustainer system:

Even when it looks like a neck humbucker (like in the Revolver Pro), it relies on a single coil measuring only a few Ohm / milliHenries and preamplified to death when used as a pickup... So it has no measurable resonance at all in the audio range. That's why it makes a rather dull neck pickup with some added hiss, although it's playable.
It's quieter than the VH-401 humbucker, even when its volume trim pot is set full up on the circuit. Unless the bridge humbucker is wired in parallel, giving matched levels (but a less efficient operation in Sustainer mode).

Since the system eats batteries for lunch, I've paired it with a 3 lugs rotary switch giving active or passive operation while enabling or disabling the battery... The led absurdly buried in the electronic cavity (and to stupidly watch through a tiny hole in the backplate) has also been relocated in a hole between pots, that I can see while playing.

In (stock) active mode, wether the Sustainer is enabled or not, there's no cable capacitance emulation so the onboard humbucker sounds as if it was played through 15cm of cable: it has much sparkle and crispness (especially with such a low stray capacitance). It's apparently needed for the Sustainer to work. It must also be why Fernandes has mounted 250k volume and tone controls. I've put a single 500k volume pot instead, with a push-pull for series/parallel operation... The tone pot has been pulled off: it worked strangely in active mode anyway.

The Sustainer worked well with the X2N in bridge position but levels were too mismatched, FWIW.

Maybe I'll try some trembucker instead of the VH401, for a better action of the Sustainer on the high E string. Time will tell.

FWIW and only meant to share possibly helpful info...
 
Very cool review! I've read about different sustainer systems for years, but never owned a guitar with one. Your review has details others miss. Do you see a future for a well-designed sustainer system?
 
Very cool review! I've read about different sustainer systems for years, but never owned a guitar with one. Your review has details others miss. Do you see a future for a well-designed sustainer system?

Th for the kind words. Regarding the future, frankly, I don't know... The sustainer FX can be heard on famous tracks and comes stock in EOB Strats so there's probably a market for that but I can't tell if it would justify a new product. Personally I've bought it by accident, when I've found a Revolver Pro without even knowing that it included a Sustainer (it's an instrument that I've paid a very low price, to a very nice lady who obviously had zero knowledge about guitars)...
 
Nice review. I recently got a new Schecter with a Sustainiac & I love it. Curious to know how/how much that differs from a Fernandes Sustainer? Also just ordered a Digitech FreqOut pedal which, from what I can tell does the same thing, but obviously you can plug any guitar into it. (have'nt recevied it yet..it's on the way). If so I would guess it kinda makes having a Sustainer-type pickup mounted on your guitar obsolete?
 
Nice review. I recently got a new Schecter with a Sustainiac & I love it. Curious to know how/how much that differs from a Fernandes Sustainer? Also just ordered a Digitech FreqOut pedal which, from what I can tell does the same thing, but obviously you can plug any guitar into it. (have'nt recevied it yet..it's on the way). If so I would guess it kinda makes having a Sustainer-type pickup mounted on your guitar obsolete?

From what I've gathered, the Sustainiac seems to be very close to the Sustainer under another frame.

Regarding pedals able to do the same: Boss GT MFX's include for ages a "feedbacker" effect able to mimic convincingly a sustainer once properly set. That's what I used before to buy the Fernandes (and again, I've not bought it for its Sustainer: it was just there).
Both FX's work well but the tracking is better and the effect more "organic" with the Sustainer in the guitar.

Now, my testimonial was mainly about the VH401: this PU helped me to understand why some people are fond of Japanese humbuckers, that I hadn't really dug until now... :-)
 
Can a FreqOut work on chords, too?

I would imagine so...

..here's what it says on the Official product page..

"FreqOut uses advanced pitch-detection technology to automatically identify the harmonic content of single notes and chords, then enables those certain frequencies to feed back in a musical way".
 
I would imagine so...

..here's what it says on the Official product page..

"FreqOut uses advanced pitch-detection technology to automatically identify the harmonic content of single notes and chords, then enables those certain frequencies to feed back in a musical way".

Oh cool. It would have to be great at that 'pitch-detection technology', but I will have to try one some day.
 
If you go sustainer/sustainiac, you will instantly understand that there is no pedal for this effect.
I built a working model in 1981 and tried to patent it only to find that Greg Heet already held a patent for an onboard system.
The current products are great and I own both but with mods.
I now only put them on guitars with wide pickup spacing and actually bought a new Kramer Pacer classic since the pickups are at least 1/2 inch further apart than my Ibanez and Yamaha RG and RGX. (22 frets).
New pacers have sharp fret ends when delivered and a shim in the neck that put’s the tremolo super high.

Inverse square law tells me that having more distance between pickups will allow you to run more power for a stronger effect.
 
Back
Top