nooklear said:whats the difference? apart from one being flat and the other being carved i mean..
is there a difference in sound? or just feel?
bloodswords said:carved tops benefit hollow bodies more than solid bodies. Les Paul insisted flat tops for the Les Paul models but the Gibson people prefered otherwise.
"I've still got my first 2 Les Pauls & they're the 2 best guitars i've got. They were made the way I thought they should be made- with a flat top." -Les Paul. (Taken from GUITARISTicons, 2002)
Blueline said:a carve top guitar - aside from sometimes looking better (perosnal pref. aside) allows a thicker (typically) mpale capto be added adding a bit of brightness and defintion to the tone
that being said, given a mahogany flat top LP and one with the maple top, the maple carved otp model with have a littlem ore sparkle to the top end and a little better bite and definiton - but not as much as a maple necked version would have
cheers
MattPete said:Add the maple neck to the mapled capped body, and I'd bet you have a nasty sounding guitar that's booth overly bright yet bassy.
MattPete said:I would think that the maple neck version would be snappier, and the maple capped version brighter. Add the maple neck to the mapled capped body, and I'd bet you have a nasty sounding guitar that's booth overly bright yet bassy.
Boston Joe said:Add some walnut to that and you a have a 70's Les Pual.