Inflames626
New member
Hi all,
Been trying out the Custom line and Gibson's "PAFs" (I say that because every PAF thread seems to end up with someone saying "X isn't a real PAF even though it's marketed as a PAF tone.")
Contrary to popular opinion, I really, really like the Gibson 498T. I also like the Custom 5, although the scooped mids make it a bit of a one trick pony (Godsmack, Nickelback, newer Metallica). Very thumpy. Any additional balls I need that are found natively in a hotter design like the Dirty Fingers I can dial in with the amp. I've paired the 498t with the Classic 57+ in the neck and am well pleased for what I consider a metal Les Paul imitation.
I haven't tried the 500t yet or the Custom. I was wondering if anyone has any general observations.
From what I've heard of the 500t, it can be quite shrill and somewhat thin, kind of like a Distortion in the highs. The highs in the 498t sound very well balanced to me. The Custom 5 is a little darker and mushier.
I'm leaning toward the Custom instead of the 500t on most of my guitars, which are Floyded, because to my knowledge Gibson doesn't have a wide variety of aftermarket trem spaced pups with four conductors.
Also, is the 496r a bright neck pup like an EMG 60 or a Duncan Jazz? It's ceramic. I imagine it's on a lot of stock Explorers because it's Gibson's version of a moderate output bright neck pickup.
Thanks.
Been trying out the Custom line and Gibson's "PAFs" (I say that because every PAF thread seems to end up with someone saying "X isn't a real PAF even though it's marketed as a PAF tone.")
Contrary to popular opinion, I really, really like the Gibson 498T. I also like the Custom 5, although the scooped mids make it a bit of a one trick pony (Godsmack, Nickelback, newer Metallica). Very thumpy. Any additional balls I need that are found natively in a hotter design like the Dirty Fingers I can dial in with the amp. I've paired the 498t with the Classic 57+ in the neck and am well pleased for what I consider a metal Les Paul imitation.
I haven't tried the 500t yet or the Custom. I was wondering if anyone has any general observations.
From what I've heard of the 500t, it can be quite shrill and somewhat thin, kind of like a Distortion in the highs. The highs in the 498t sound very well balanced to me. The Custom 5 is a little darker and mushier.
I'm leaning toward the Custom instead of the 500t on most of my guitars, which are Floyded, because to my knowledge Gibson doesn't have a wide variety of aftermarket trem spaced pups with four conductors.
Also, is the 496r a bright neck pup like an EMG 60 or a Duncan Jazz? It's ceramic. I imagine it's on a lot of stock Explorers because it's Gibson's version of a moderate output bright neck pickup.
Thanks.
