Gibson emerges from Ch11

Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Guitar Giant Gibson's Bankruptcy-Ending Plan Approved
10/2/2018 by Grant Rindner

One of the marquee names in the guitar industry, Gibson, is preparing for life after bankruptcy. The nearly 116-year-old company submitted a plan to keep itself in business that was approved in a U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Tuesday (Oct. 2).

Gibson initially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May, with a reorganization plan already in place to allow them to keep operating with $135 million of lent money. After that, the company rededicated to making musical instruments, since much of its financial troubles stemmed from an ill-fated foray into consumer electronics.

The plan, per Reuters, is for Gibson to wipe its $500 million of debt and use as much as $70 million to galvanize its “business plan for growth.” Gibson will be run by its bondholders, including Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and Melody Capital.

It’s a smart time for a move back into the fretted instrument market, as data from Music Trades indicated that acoustic guitar sales were up 8.6 percent from 2016 to 2017, and 9.1 percent for electric guitars. The broader fretted instrument retail market rose by 8.9 percent, generating $1.94 billion.

Per The Wall Street Journal, Gibson CEO Henry Juszkiewicz will likely be replaced and will be placed on a one-year consulting contract. In a February interview with Billboard, Juszkiewicz talked about how the guitar industry can be notoriously slow to change and adapt to a new consumer landscape.

“[The industry is] stuck in a time warp, and the 'purists' have a very loud voice on the online forums. If you are a kid today, you have an iPad by the age of two, and if you're not offering new technology you're old. Kids today may think some music from the '50s is kind of cool here and there, but what other industry do you know that hasn't changed since the '50s?” he said. “Those guitars from the '50s are what the purists want, but we have to have something new and exciting. Imagine if the camera had never changed. Innovation is a part of every business to some degree, but [the guitar industry] hates it.

You're welcome! ;)

/Peter
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

That last sentence is odd. I love innovation. Hate "goofiness". Like auto-tuners. This last weekend I could have snagged a Peavey AT-200 for next to nothing, but didn't want one. I think it was the Gibson Firebird that was even worse. (Can't remember the name. Someone posted a pic recently.)
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

The only problem with the Firebird X was it was ugly af. I got the chance to play one and it was a decent instrument that did what it was designed to do. All of the problems I found with it were no more than qc issues standard from this "era".
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

The only problem with the Firebird X was it was ugly af. I got the chance to play one and it was a decent instrument that did what it was designed to do. All of the problems I found with it were no more than qc issues standard from this "era".
Good point... You liked it... But did you buy one? And how many others liked it and bought one?

This is case in point for one of their biggest problems... Customer driven product development...

First, thet need to research market potential... In this case, the number of people who wanted one and could afford one and would actually buy one was very small.

Second, you have to detirmine the return on investment if you build the product... In this case the numbers would most likely have been negative.

Once you have built the business case, you can build and pitch, but they got it backwards on FirebirdX and Robo and this drains off capital every time.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
 
Bloomberg detail- HJ can't talk and lost his stakes

Bloomberg detail- HJ can't talk and lost his stakes

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...at-kkr-lead-rock-music-icon-out-of-bankruptcy

Juszkiewicz and co-owner Dave Berryman will see their equity stakes canceled. Both will get a consulting agreement that bar them from making negative comments about Gibson for three years, a lawyer for noteholders told U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi in court Tuesday.

Rumor has it that the consulting contracts are still in the millions- will look at the fillings tonight-

Cross posting to the CEO thread cause I don't know who is looking where;)
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Literally none of this matters. The CEO is the least important part of the company. If they keep making decent guitars, they'll be fine.
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Hmm- EP, I don't think we've discussed this before and I'm interested in your thinking.

Not being rude, but do you not believe:

  • That Gibson's brand power has eroded?
  • That a significant number of previous customers moved on to the competition and/or have quality issues?
  • That a large number of competitors moved in to fill the void?
  • That the dealer network has been slashed and that new users are far more likely to play Ibanez, Yamaha, Taylor, PRS or Fender guitars that are hanging on dealer walls?

And do you not believe that the previous CEO got the company into bankruptcy by:

  • Buying companies that weren't positive Returns on Investments?
  • Building products that users didn't want that cost the company a lot of money?
I could go on and on, but the Saving Gibson series covered this and a ton of other stuff- Did you have a chance to read it and are you interested in business best practices?

Bottom line, I would be interested in understanding if you think Gibson doesn't have major challenges and if the CEO is the person who makes the majority of Return On Investment decisions in a small/medium company.
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Henry J's influence is saturated into every pore and process...it is going to take a massive and concerted effort to effect change...
My bet would be on Gibson guitar company (including Epiphone of course) remaining pretty much the same...they have a cozy little niche so the investors will be happy with the debt gone and a nice steady return from this nostalgic business...
Still think they should release a PRS knock off just to even the score...
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Fred it's funny- Before we started the series I discussed outcomes with my partners and 2/3 bet that nothing will change, just as you say.

But we decided to go ahead and evaluate the opportunity, much like we would with any organization, because the opportunity is so great- Gibson won't dethrone Yamaha or regain the market that everyone from Suhr to Reverend have grabbed-

But if they do the work and get the portfolio balanced and refocus on guitars with value that users really want, they probably could catch, or even surpass, Fender.

And they could get the brand cleaned and polished. I think that's the part that gets me deep down. I want Gibson to be great.

But as we've discussed before, it's a challenge to get small/medium US companies to look at the data- as a European buddy said, we're genetically cowboys in the US and we want to be free to do whatever we want and that's the opposite of efficient:)

He's certainly a bit biased;) But I think he is probably correct on this one, if they haven't accomplish anything other than dumping debt, they will continue to slide on market share, mind share and brand value.
 
Re: Gibson emerges from Ch11

Interesting article about Nat Zilkha, former lead guitarist and dobro player for Red Roosters and CH11 leader for KKR and a plan for musicians on the board-

http://loudwire.com/gibson-guided-out-bankruptcy-former-rocker-turned-businessman/

This will allow Gibson to exit bankruptcy and take on a new board of directors, the majority of whom will be guitarists. The aim is to restore consumer confidence in the company by refocusing on the instrument that made the brand famous around the world. Over the decades, countless legends, including Led Zeppelin, AC/DC. KISS, Judas Priest, Metallica, Guns N' Roses and others have considered Gibson guitars their go-to instruments.
 
Back
Top