Gibson RD Standard

Re: Gibson RD Standard

Does anyone here have any personal experience with these guitars, specifically the three-knob version Gibson reissued last year?

- Keith

I do Sir. Originally they were sold for 1600 bucks.
Then, as sales winded down, and this cause of the economy and the fact they were not that well received they were clearenced on Stupid Deal for 700.00.

They are amazingly good big fat slabs of Mahogany..no chambering or weight relieving here.

The 70's Original RD's were all maple, and some had active electronics. They are good guitars, but not that expensive even though they are vintage.

The first reissue of the old '70's RD was Silverburst and made with a Mahogany, not Maple body liek the originals, and when they got Clearenced, me and Jolly bought one. This is my favorite, cause its one massive slab of wood, and had amazing Dirty Fingers..trust me, it deosn't like low gain amps.

After that, Gibson reissued the RD again about 9 months later, but this time in Ebony and Natural Amber only and dropped the Silverburst , and also with Mahogany bodies and also they did not come with Dirty Fingers like the Silverburst reish, but with PAF Pro's.


The black guitars are still available for a low price around 800.00. but the Amberburst is a lot more desirable, and a great guitar to hang onto tat will really climb in value I think. Sounds great,looks awesome in natural, and plays great.
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I know Jolly really liked his. I've not actually had the chance to play one myself but the things just look like giant slabs of DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

They seem pretty cool but the upper fret access *looks* awful and the originals were 25 1/2 scale, not the 24 3/4 like the new ones.
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I have only ever tried the original Norlin era model. The body contouring and scale length lend a very Fenderish wearing experience. The neck profile is unmistakably Gibson, as is the sound - albeit on the bright side, thanks to all of that maple. The active electronics were cool for session musicians but a pain to use in a blues/rock context.
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

Keith!

Good to see you 'round here my man!

I have nothing to add really...I had a 70's RS Artist for a while but have not tried the new ones...
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I've got a silverburst one, and I love it. It's a heavy metal machine!! The Dirty Fingers pickups sound great. It blows my mind how great they sound on a clean channel. I don't have anything bad at all to say about mine. I think mine is about four years old.

Picture022.jpg
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I played one once. MASSIVE tone. Huge, thick sound. LOTS of sustain.
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

Good to see ya Keith, I can't add anything other than they are really ugly S.O.Bs but in a cool kind of way!
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

Thanks for all the help, guys! Jolly, yours looks most excellent. (BTW, I owe you a phone call. I was out running when you called.)
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

This is as good a deal as you're ever likely to see on a trans-amber mint one. Much nicer than the Ebony. I have one of these and its amazing. Burstbucker Pros, not the Dirty Fingers..sounds more Paf'ish. Deep rich and sweet tone 4 days.;

http://www.ebay.com/itm/GIBSON-RD-STANDARD-2010-MINT-/280861482896?pt=Guitar&hash=item4164a61f90

*sigh*

Why are you doing this to me?


Picture looks familiar. :scratchch

Yo! I was driving around Byard Lane just the other day...

I miss the old 'hood. :(
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I own a '94 LP Standard ('59 neck, JB bridge) and an SG Classic (stock P90s). Someone make a compelling argument why I need an RD Standard beyond looks.
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

I own a '94 LP Standard ('59 neck, JB bridge) and an SG Classic (stock P90s). Someone make a compelling argument why I need an RD Standard beyond looks.

Because it fills an obvious void in your collection.

In the world of Gibson solid body electrics, there is the LP tone, the P-90 tone, and the massive-flat-slab-of-mahogany-with-humbuckers tone. This tone can be achieved by a number of different models - Vs, Explorers, and all-mahog RDs... and as far as I know, you don't have any of those...
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

Because it fills an obvious void in your collection.

In the world of Gibson solid body electrics, there is the LP tone, the P-90 tone, and the massive-flat-slab-of-mahogany-with-humbuckers tone. This tone can be achieved by a number of different models - Vs, Explorers, and all-mahog RDs... and as far as I know, you don't have any of those...

Correct. I don't have anything in the V/Explorer family. However, given that both the SG and LP are mahogany, how different is the tone with an Explorer-type?
 
Re: Gibson RD Standard

Correct. I don't have anything in the V/Explorer family. However, given that both the SG and LP are mahogany, how different is the tone with an Explorer-type?

Well your LP has a maple top, which affects the tone significantly.

And your SG has P-90s, so that's different altogether.

See?

Keep in mind that this is coming from the guy whose guitar collection consists of an SG Classic, a Hamer Special, a Tele, a Strat, and a Gibson ES-339. I don't like redundancy.
 
Back
Top