Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Studio-Lack of binding, limited finishes

Standard-Binding, nice flame maple tops, burst finishes

Nothing wrong at all with the studios after a few tweaks. The both have the same electronics, but I've never seemed to like any of the Gibson pups.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

IMHO, there is better QC with the standards so there are fewer that you have to sift through to find a good one. But though you may have to go through more studios to get there, the tone and quality will be there when you do. It really comes down to asthetics and resale value, this is where the Standard will win hands down. FWIW, no two guitars will ever sound the same.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Whats the difference between a gibson studio les paul and a gibson standard les paul? (Sound, parts, hardware, pickups, etc.?)

Binding and $1000 :wall:

Seriously... this is for new models of each:

Standards:
figured top
binding
50s or 60s carve available according to Gibson
Burstbucker Pro pickups
$2200

Studios:
plain top
no binding
59 LP Rounded neck carve
498T/490R pickups
$1100

So binding and $1000 wasn't that far off. Hardware and electronics (pups aside) are identical. Studios used to be a little thinner than standards, but I'm not positive that's still the case. Haven't played a brand new studio in a while.


edit: I wouldn't say that the QC on the Standards is going to be any better, but I wouldn't be surprised that better wood stock was used on standards.
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Don't forget you can get Burstbucker Pros on the Vintage Mahogany Studios, which are about $800 new. You still may have to sift through some turds to find a good one, but they're killer guitars when you do.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Note the classics as well, they have plain tops, the "inferior" pups and the binding
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Note the classics as well, they have plain tops, the "inferior" pups and the binding

ya and those things cost 2oo bucks less than a fancy standard. gibson's prices are rediculous to me, although, I absolutly love my les paul, and I dont think I'd be as good of a player without it.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

here is what I would do:

1) play before I pay
2) get the gibson standard and not the studio

that way Ill will be happy years into the future.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

When I bought my Studio about 8 months ago, I played about 8 standards (all they had in stock) and 4 Studios. I bought the one I felt most comfortable with, which was a Studio and I saved the grand. I kind of like the "plain look", mine is classic white. As others have said, I'm not sure the "quality" is that far off. All depends on which ones you get your hands on. Of course I'm sure some Standards are probably miles ahead of some Studios, just depends on what you can find.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Some of the older Studios have thinner bodies (by about 1/4 to 3/8") which can affect the sound some.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

here is what I would do:

1) play before I pay
2) get the gibson standard and not the studio

that way Ill will be happy years into the future.

I concur with 1), but not too sure about 3).....I'm of the opinion that the Studio is just as good as a Standard except for the cosmetics although at least the Studio has some nice inlay in the fretboard. If I could've afforded a Standard or Classic at the time I bought my used Studio (since then Gibson has put some nicer finishes on newer Studio models) I certainly would've jumped on one....a nice finish would always be cooler. However I'm happy with the way my mine plays and sounds after installing some bitchin' SD pups and giving it a good set-up and will never part with her.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Some of the older Studios have thinner bodies (by about 1/4 to 3/8") which can affect the sound some.
I could still be happy with this but it is a matter of preference
I concur with 1), but not too sure about 3).....I'm of the opinion that the Studio is just as good as a Standard except for the cosmetics although at least the Studio has some nice inlay in the fretboard. If I could've afforded a Standard or Classic at the time I bought my used Studio (since then Gibson has put some nicer finishes on newer Studio models) I certainly would've jumped on one....a nice finish would always be cooler. However I'm happy with the way my mine plays and sounds after installing some bitchin' SD pups and giving it a good set-up and will never part with her.

that must be a great guitar - many choices - you got a good one ;)
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

I say play as many studios and standards as necessary to find one that really stands out feelwise and tonewise. Definatelly play before you buy. You may even wanna look into those Vintage Mahogany Les Pauls which are sweet for the money if you can find a good one. They may not be as cosmetically appealing as the studios or standards but they are lighter and sound amazing if you can find a good one.
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Those are reasonable changes. And the pots are optional. heck - you might even think the pups are ok.

Bottom line: A studio is everything that makes an LP an LP. If it's about the cash - go studio. Otherwise go standard (or classic - whatever).

Bottom line: Get one that feels awesome (search boobie test) and has a nice acoustic sound - whichever you choose.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

In mu opinion, a nice, used Standard is a much better buy than a new Studio. Not to say the studio isn't a nice guitar because it is, but the Standard will hold value better, most likely has better wood, binding, and better pickups. Just my .02
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

I vote used Standard over Studio. That said, I also would vote used studio over Standard if you're short on money (like me). All the Gibson, half the price.

I don't think Gibson ever made a better Studio than mine (and Aceman's) - but I sure wish it had it's original P90s. I also would sell my right nut for a Honeyburst/Amber/Iced Tea Standard.
 
Re: Gibson Studio Vs Standard Les Paul??

Note the classics as well, they have plain tops, the "inferior" pups and the binding

The classic antiques that came out this year have flame tops and classic '57 pups for the same price as a regular classic. I really like the way the 57 pups sound...
 
Back
Top