Re: @#$&$&@ gibson, why so much $$$
matt99camero said:
Wow, the "working musician" phrase sure has gotten alot of use after I said it. By "working musician" I think of a guy who is out there trying to make a name for himself while struggling to support him and his family. I guess I kinda brought Fender into this, but I just used Fender as an example. It was just an observation that I made. Most of the other big companies make budget guitars for people like me. I'm a student trying to pay bills and play on the side, I can't hold down a full time job, I probably make $5000 a year. There is no way I can drop $2000 for a single guitar, but I can afford a $400 Standard Strat. I've spent probably $3000 on guitar gear in the last 3 years and have a nice collection of mid leval guitar gear. I'd much rather have that then one really nice guitar. I do have a Gibson LP Jr. and I love it, but I had to save my butt of just to get that. If I had the money you can bet your ass I'd buy a LP Custom, but I don't, if you do then great. I just think with Gibson's pricing they cut out a lot of people who they could be making sales to but they don't care about them because they probably make more money off of the sale of one Les Paul Standard as Fender does off of the sale of two or three Standard Strats.
They apparently don't cut enough people out to hurt their bottom line enough to drive their prices down.
I love LP's, have just one, but have owned about 10 over the years, wish I could have kept them all. Do I wish they were cheaper? OH YEAH.
Do I think every decision Henry J. & Co. makes is brilliant? Oh noooo.... The internet picture thing is just a fiasco, and even they seem to have realized that because they have relented in some cases:
http://www.guitarsale.com/Gibson-d6425.music
Driving the mom-and-pops out of the franchise if they hold less than $150,000 worth on the walls at any given moment -- well, I'd have to know more about WHY they're doing that before I could say it was a truly bad decision, though strictly from a customer's POV, I definitely don't like it. I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop.
My main beef with Gibson has been the very shaky fretwork over the past 10 years, though that seems to be improving over the past year or two. There really isn't any excuse for that.
But the best solution, even better than a boycott, to improve Gibson quality is to simply leave the lousy ones on the shelves and buy only the killer ones. Anyone who gets stuck with a crummy LP, it's their own fault for either not playing it first it or for not being able to tell a good one from a bad one even after they tried it out. That doesn't mean Gibson shouldn't handle things a little better from their end, but we've got to hold up ours. If we're real guitar players, we should know a real guitar when we play it. If we don't, we're just posers who deserve to get ripped off.
As for buying a Fender as a substitute for a Gibson, a Strat or Tele just doesn't cut it. They're just very different critters and assuming in a fantasy way for a moment that real LP's were cheaper than Teles and Strats, I wouldn't recommend an LP as a substitute for either one. It's just a totally different sound/feel/vibe. But real Gibsons are available to guys like you, your Junior and the Special pictured earlier in another post being the proof, and they're even a lot cheaper in the classifieds.
That said, no offense, but Gibson LP's aren't intended for struggling students. But you won't be a struggling student forever and in a few years when you're working full-time, I bet you'll have yourself a real LP, maybe even a Historic. I certainly wish you the best there -- they are another notch or two above the average USA Les Paul and you won't be sorry. But even there, be very choosy -- even a great guitar isn't for every player. Get the one that just sends you into orbit and settle for nothing less...