sosomething
Seymour Duncan Customer Support
Re: Got my Dimarzio Andy Timmons AT-1 pickup yesterday
^^ There's probably a good bit of truth to that.
^^ There's probably a good bit of truth to that.
i really liked the at1 in stratty type guitars. in les pauls its not defined enough. it stays a bit 'tame' I suppose. its not as raunchy or dirty as a JB, though I understand where the association comes from.
Where the AT-1 and JB comparisons lay is in the harmonic content, which is extremely high in both pickups. I compared them back to back a couple days ago straight into one of my mod amps and the sustained tone of both was jaw droppingly similar. Where they differ the most I think is this: With 500k pots, the JB can be obnoxious in a lot of guitars, the AT-1 is not; a 250k pot tames the obnoxious out of a JB but then it can become a bit tubby in some guitars. At that point it is darker than an AT-1. In away the AT-1 sort of solves the issue with a JB being too piercing with 500k, a tad too dark with 250k. AT-1 with 250k would be too dark for my rig, YMMV. I have 4 or 5 of each installed in various guitars at the moment and a pile more of each that have yet to be installed so I'm pretty familiar with both, and the comparisons are valid, they are both singing, high harmonic content pickups for sure. Take a JB, trim off some of the tendency to be piercing, add a bit of punch in the lows, there is an AT-1.
To my ear the AT-1 has more in common with a JB than it does with a Breed or TZ, while the Breed, TZ, AZ fall into the same family. Both the JB and the AT-1 have that lush harmonic content, like a big ball of sonic cotton, that the Breed/TZ/AZ don't have. Whether that works or not depends on the guitar.
Where the AT-1 and JB comparisons lay is in the harmonic content, which is extremely high in both pickups. I compared them back to back a couple days ago straight into one of my mod amps and the sustained tone of both was jaw droppingly similar. Where they differ the most I think is this: With 500k pots, the JB can be obnoxious in a lot of guitars, the AT-1 is not; a 250k pot tames the obnoxious out of a JB but then it can become a bit tubby in some guitars. At that point it is darker than an AT-1. In away the AT-1 sort of solves the issue with a JB being too piercing with 500k, a tad too dark with 250k. AT-1 with 250k would be too dark for my rig, YMMV. I have 4 or 5 of each installed in various guitars at the moment and a pile more of each that have yet to be installed so I'm pretty familiar with both, and the comparisons are valid, they are both singing, high harmonic content pickups for sure. Take a JB, trim off some of the tendency to be piercing, add a bit of punch in the lows, there is an AT-1.
To my ear the AT-1 has more in common with a JB than it does with a Breed or TZ, while the Breed, TZ, AZ fall into the same family. Both the JB and the AT-1 have that lush harmonic content, like a big ball of sonic cotton, that the Breed/TZ/AZ don't have. Whether that works or not depends on the guitar.
Thanks for the detailed review. How does he AT-1 compare to the DP160 Norton? Do you have any similar experience with Dimarzio, full size humbucking, neck pickups that pair with the AT-1 well? Are any sound clips of your amps available?
I dont think the AT-1 is right for modern metal. Its a bit too much vintage sounding, with a lot of harmonic overtones.
Its fine for 80s shred metal, but IMO it doesn't have the right clarity for modern high gain metal styles.
Sometimes nuance is lost over the internet, so please know there is no malice in this post.
A pickup is an extension of the instrument (guitar in this case). The guitar can be used for whatever type of music. The more gain and effects that are layered on, the less you hear the guitars natural sound. The pickup is merely another layer; it does not define what style of music is played. There are many ingredients needed to go from a clean Jazz tone to a drop tuning metal sound, and a pickup is a small factor in that.