jumble jumble
New member
So this is probably one of the most-asked questions on the internet when it comes to guitars, along with "Which Sounds Better, Sonic Blue or Seafoam Green?", and "Will I Get More Sustain If I Eat 50 Cheeseburgers A Day For A Month?". More often than not, the answers will be along the lines of trying to replicate the gear that was used on the original recording, or, if not, they'll be about trying to find gear that does a good approximation of that original gear.
Factors you will almost always see mentioned, with varying degrees of importance according to factors such as which artist we're talking about and how much in the mood for an argument we are:
Amp
Pickups
Guitar model
Effects
Woods
Scale length
Guitar mods
Capacitors
Pot Values
Nut material
Sustain block mass
Cable length
Trem setup
Amp power supply voltage
Speaker type
Number of speakers
Technique
A factor you will see basically never, is:
Microphone model and placement
What's with that? Guys, we all know the effect switching from one mic to another can have, or moving it back or forward a little, or tilting it, and so on. It's a massive effect. Way, way bigger than many of the things in that first list. We're seriously suggesting switching to a brass nut or something, while the tone that the person has given us as a reference is from a mic'd amp. (Plus of course the post production EQ, but let's not even get into that.)
Anyway I'm just as guilty as everyone else: why don't we ever mention it? My only theory is that most people are looking to get a tone for use either at home, or at small gigs and rehearsals - when they gig, they use their own tone. Is that really true? I don't know. I feel like it's weird we don't at least mention it. Like, we always say "tone is in the fingers", even though we don't then suggest the person gets new fingers. So why don't we ever say "a lot of that tone is in the mic"?
Factors you will almost always see mentioned, with varying degrees of importance according to factors such as which artist we're talking about and how much in the mood for an argument we are:
Amp
Pickups
Guitar model
Effects
Woods
Scale length
Guitar mods
Capacitors
Pot Values
Nut material
Sustain block mass
Cable length
Trem setup
Amp power supply voltage
Speaker type
Number of speakers
Technique
A factor you will see basically never, is:
Microphone model and placement
What's with that? Guys, we all know the effect switching from one mic to another can have, or moving it back or forward a little, or tilting it, and so on. It's a massive effect. Way, way bigger than many of the things in that first list. We're seriously suggesting switching to a brass nut or something, while the tone that the person has given us as a reference is from a mic'd amp. (Plus of course the post production EQ, but let's not even get into that.)
Anyway I'm just as guilty as everyone else: why don't we ever mention it? My only theory is that most people are looking to get a tone for use either at home, or at small gigs and rehearsals - when they gig, they use their own tone. Is that really true? I don't know. I feel like it's weird we don't at least mention it. Like, we always say "tone is in the fingers", even though we don't then suggest the person gets new fingers. So why don't we ever say "a lot of that tone is in the mic"?