humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

T.M.A.

New member
Hey Guys,

Well, I didn't want to ever do this, but the time has finally come: I need a BRIDGE pickup recommendation/ advice...

I'll make this as brief as I can:

JCM 800 2204 vertical input - LOVE that amp it is my holy grail amp
2x12 closed back cab 1x K 100 and 1 V30 - perfect amount of bass juicyness for "legato" and midrange grind
2 stratesque japanese Westone guitars to choose from: 1 is all maple with rosewood fretboard (HUm HUM) -The other is all maple (H,S,S,) -Right now the maple with the rosewood fretboard is my go to with this amp set up. The rosewood dampens the forthrightness of the maple just enough. Both have tremolo bridges that I don't use at all. The all maples is stopped off with a wooden block.

My tone really is great just with the stock Japanese pick up BUT:
It is too thin -and the eq isn't right. Not enough upper mids to get the notes really jumping out.

After MUCH research and reading on this forum, I decided to try the FULL SHRED. I figured that in such a low tuning the lack of bass (especially paired with the K100, which is such a juicy, bassy speaker) would make for a really good tight sound. AND... I was right. I didn't have to try to get those notes out at all. they were just flying out of the guitar and for once, I didn't have to give myself a carpal tunnel trying to get those notes out. The full shred was almost there... BUT, a couple things: WAY too much gain. And it lacked a bit of beef to it. I know that I was trying to use it in an unconventional manner, but there just wasn't enough mids to cradle the treble(?) -and the bass notes just weren't there. Another problem with the full shred was that the more I dug in, the less defined and focused the sound got, and the more it just started to sort of widen and get a bit fluffy on me. You know when your playing and getting the opposite of what should be happening? Also, the full shred was a regular humbucker, when i really should have used a trembucker, but the stock pickup was just a regular humbucker anyway and still, the full shred had too much gain, not enough girth/ balls etc.

Anyway, i called a SUPER NICE guy from SD. He suggested that I try the CUSTOM (ceramic magnet in theory would be tighter etc. etc.) So i sent back the full shred and popped in the custom... TOTAL DUD for my application. -Wrong EQ (Pretty much the oppostie EQ that I need.) WAY TOO compressed (*I'm all about right hand picking dynamics -the less compression and gain the better) and Way too much gain (again). I GET ALL THE GAIN I NEED FROM MY AMP. I'm not a gain guy. I like just enough break up to hurt.

SOOO... after another lengthy chat with the gentleman today, he gave me an RA number for the 59/ Custom Hybrid. He really seemed to think that was the ticket.

I have my doubts... The pickup seems a bit gimmicky to me. I like a good old fairly neutral, articulate sound, where the amp and the guitar just speak for themselves. I'm not too much a fan of pickups that impart a certain NEW CHARACTER or voicing. I just like a visceral, low tuned, punchy sound. Ala tool or RATM. Early Pearl jam. Early Alice in chains.

So, what do ya'll have to say about this?!

We were almost there with the Full Shred. I'm thinkin that those hex pole pieces were a winner perhaps. (BTW. i put the full shred in my all maple and the Custom in my all maple with the rosewood fretboard. I know that would have made a difference, but i know my rig well enough to know what was going on.)

The ideal pickup for this application would be:

-Almost full shred EQ (maybe 4,6,8 ?)
-As little gain and compression as possible
-and good articulation and "percussiveness" -a hard hitting, punchy, physical attack on the that low string.

Suggestions on which guitar to experiment with? I'm probably getting into custom pickup territory... I know, I tune low...

I truly thank you for your time. THANKS.
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

I second the 59/custom. Ive played some brutal chuggy stuff with one in C# standard and drop B

Just bought a Screamin Demon but have not put it in yet

I think Cantrell and Adam Jones used a JB?

Also look into the Dimarzio Norton
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Screamin 'Demon. It is every bit as tight as the Full Shred, but has less output and therefor results in a less compressed, more open and "bigger" sound. The Full shreds top end and bottom end are reined in compared to the 'Demon; a more focused sound which was obviously the goal. The 'Demon has a little more on the top and bottom.
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Fantastic suggestions guys. It has been a long, lonely journey and I really appreciate your feedback!
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

I just looked at the Screaming Demon. i was actually thinking of that pickup a long time ago, but a tech friend of mine steered me away from it. i just noticed that it has one row of hex poles, which i was actually thinking last night would be a cool idea. -A bit of the authority and forthrightness of the full shred, but maybe just a little more forgiving in what it picks up. Yeah, definitley want to try that one...
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

You all caught that i was heavily downtuned right?
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Sorry, duh. i wrote it in the title...
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

A full shred with tighter lows and more mids is the Dimarzio Crunchlab, it appears to be a high output pup but there's more to it than that, I think you'd really like it....
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

A full shred with tighter lows and more mids is the Dimarzio Crunchlab, it appears to be a high output pup but there's more to it than that, I think you'd really like it....

Ahh... interesting. i just checked it out via the dimarzio site and listened to the sample. It looks like it has the opposite EQ that I need, but it sounds like it has the articulation. Hmm... interesting. I'm going to run through some more SD's simply because I don't have the money to spend on a bunch of pickups right now, but if none of them work I shall seek out this pup... Thanks for that new, insightful suggestion man!
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The Crunch Lab will likely be too hot for you. Its a sweet PU tho
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The Crunch Lab will likely be too hot for you. Its a sweet PU tho

Yeah Inder Mann, i have a feeling you're right. I just packaged my Custom Trembucker for shipping back to SD. Gonna hit up the post office this afternoon. I figure I'll try the 59/ custom hybrid out and if it doesn't do the thing, then whatever. Next I'll try the Screamin Demon or JB. Of course the concern is that in my application, the bottom end articulation might not be there with the JB, but it's such a classic pickup i find it hard not to try it. But it's really high gain though isn't it (something like 16.1 if I'm not mistaken)? Wouldn't that render it pretty darn compressed? If somebody can, please do explain to me the relationship between the amount of gain and compression...
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The JB has looser lows. Its a badass lead guitar PU. And ya prolly too hot for what u need

I have read on here that a JB2 is cool

Screamin Demons and JBs are on ebay a lot for good prices. I got a Demon for $37 i think

Nothing against the PUs, but theyre on ebay

I LOVE my 59/custom
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The JB has looser lows. Its a badass lead guitar PU. And ya prolly too hot for what u need

I have read on here that a JB2 is cool

Screamin Demons and JBs are on ebay a lot for good prices. I got a Demon for $37 i think

Nothing against the PUs, but theyre on ebay

I LOVE my 59/custom

Just sent my Custom off. I'm a little skeptical of the 59/ Custom hybrid, as I didn't like ANYTHING about the Custom, and I've observed that it has some of the same pole pieces. I guess we'll know for sure in about a week! I heard that the custom is exactly like the full shred except with different pole pieces (and one other thing I can't remember) and i really liked some of the attitude of the full shred...
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The Custom has waaaay more bass than a full shred
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

I wonder how you would like the Jazz Model. Don't let it's name fool you.
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

I wonder how you would like the Jazz Model. Don't let it's name fool you.

Good call. I wonder how it sounds drop tuned. Im sure it would sound good.

Good call
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

I wonder how you would like the Jazz Model. Don't let it's name fool you.

I just checked out the specs on that pup. 3 for the mids and 9 on the treble -5 on the bass. Sounds pretty interesting. I think I would dig the low output as well. I just have to have an OPEN sounding pup. -I can't stand compression when it comes to my playing. It's so hard to know with pups. THE ONLY way to know if it's what you want is to buy em and whip out the soldering iron. All the speculation is just something that we do to distract ourselves... Heh heh... Anyway, you know anybody that's got a Jazz trembucker they want to let go of?
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

The Custom has waaaay more bass than a full shred

You could say that again. For me it was like bass boom compression from Hell. Just couldn't stand the thing. I'm not sure, but one thing that I think I liked about the full Shred was the Hex pole pieces. I feel that they gave it a nice BITE. -really need that bite sometimes. And I actually found it to be pretty touch responsive. I could get a sweet legato tone out of it if I wanted, and if i rolled back the volume just a tudge, I got as clean a tone as I needed. That pickup is just too damn gainy and compressed for a player like me, and also the voicing of it just wasn't wide enough -for lack of a better way of putting it. it was like, on a scale of 1-10 it only picked up 3-7. Does that make any sense?
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

You could say that again. For me it was like bass boom compression from Hell. Just couldn't stand the thing. I'm not sure, but one thing that I think I liked about the full Shred was the Hex pole pieces. I feel that they gave it a nice BITE. -really need that bite sometimes. And I actually found it to be pretty touch responsive. I could get a sweet legato tone out of it if I wanted, and if i rolled back the volume just a tudge, I got as clean a tone as I needed. That pickup is just too damn gainy and compressed for a player like me, and also the voicing of it just wasn't wide enough -for lack of a better way of putting it. it was like, on a scale of 1-10 it only picked up 3-7. Does that make any sense?

You know, you seem to know EXACTLY what you want tonewise.....and what you want out of your pickup. Just throwing this out there, but if the hybrid doesn't do it for you it might be worth your while to check out the Custom shop. MJ could wind you a Fullshred to do exactly what you want it to!
 
Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Re: humbucker for c standard and c standard with b flat on the bottom>>>>>

Good call. I wonder how it sounds drop tuned. Im sure it would sound good.

Good call
It sounds great. I use it alot in a Les Paul in Drop D.
 
Back
Top