Re: I don't want to be that "heavy string guy"...
I've tried heavier gauge strings in the past and there is a different tone and benefits to them. However the trade of with being harder to bend and play didn't really work for me and I don't have the time to put in to adjust my playing to them. I've been back to regular 9-46/9-42/10-46 gauges for quite some years now.
Those who say heavier are flat our better for tone are a little mis lead. You can get some great tones from the and it's definately a different tone than lighter gauge strings but each can get you great tone. It just depends on your amp, guitar, pick ups, technique, etc.
IIRC with SRV, he was going to lighter gauge strings before he died as the heavy ones were just taking a huge toll on his hands. One of the reasons he used the gauge he did was to get more power and umph into his sound as he used very low output pick ups. The Duncan SSL5/6 (and stacked version) is supposed to get you into his tonal territory without having to use huge strings.
I've tried heavier gauge strings in the past and there is a different tone and benefits to them. However the trade of with being harder to bend and play didn't really work for me and I don't have the time to put in to adjust my playing to them. I've been back to regular 9-46/9-42/10-46 gauges for quite some years now.
Those who say heavier are flat our better for tone are a little mis lead. You can get some great tones from the and it's definately a different tone than lighter gauge strings but each can get you great tone. It just depends on your amp, guitar, pick ups, technique, etc.
IIRC with SRV, he was going to lighter gauge strings before he died as the heavy ones were just taking a huge toll on his hands. One of the reasons he used the gauge he did was to get more power and umph into his sound as he used very low output pick ups. The Duncan SSL5/6 (and stacked version) is supposed to get you into his tonal territory without having to use huge strings.