Hi!
I've come to bother you again with my questions and my adventures with pickups.
I'm building another pickguard for my Strat and I'd like to give EMG a chance.
From the comparison demos on YouTube they seem to have a much more open sound and don't have the resonance peak like the passive ones, especially the SA graph shows them to be totally flat.
I only have experience with an 81 under the bridge, it sounds great for thrash metal, but it is very dry, I preferred the thickness of the JB.
Compared to JB, 85 sounds good and that's where I was thinking about it.
Is there also a volume drop with the HSS in EMG pickups?
Some opinions:
I was talking to a guy about SA and he said they were very dynamic.
I have also heard opinions that positions 2 and 4 sound bad with SA, SA and it is better to put S in the middle.
On the other hand, I'm concerned about the 85 model's high compression and higher volume.
That's why I considered the 89XR. Sound similar to 85x (with less compresion in theory, so lower volume, and bettter balance with hss?) and I can split on 2 position with middle pickup.
I was also considering the 58 model, but I heard that they are susceptible to interference, but I don't know if that's a myth.
I was generally thinking about the 89XR, S, SA or 89XR, S, 89XR.
Will this be a universal set?
Can I get the Strat sound from position 2 (humbucker split with middle single coil) like in Whitesnake's "Is This Love"? With my JB and FS-1 in the middle, I can achieve that sound.
With JB, using a treble bleed cap only with a logarithmic potentiometer, I can clean the signal from high gain to clean.
I know that active ones don't need treble bleed, but I wonder if I'll be able to clean the tone as well as with passives?
Can I create an HSH setup (89xr S 89xr) with autosplit in positions 2 and 4, and manually on the switch or push-pull to create SSS? I've often done this with passives, but I have no experience with actives.
Best Regards.
I've come to bother you again with my questions and my adventures with pickups.
I'm building another pickguard for my Strat and I'd like to give EMG a chance.
From the comparison demos on YouTube they seem to have a much more open sound and don't have the resonance peak like the passive ones, especially the SA graph shows them to be totally flat.
I only have experience with an 81 under the bridge, it sounds great for thrash metal, but it is very dry, I preferred the thickness of the JB.
Compared to JB, 85 sounds good and that's where I was thinking about it.
Is there also a volume drop with the HSS in EMG pickups?
Some opinions:
I was talking to a guy about SA and he said they were very dynamic.
I have also heard opinions that positions 2 and 4 sound bad with SA, SA and it is better to put S in the middle.
On the other hand, I'm concerned about the 85 model's high compression and higher volume.
That's why I considered the 89XR. Sound similar to 85x (with less compresion in theory, so lower volume, and bettter balance with hss?) and I can split on 2 position with middle pickup.
I was also considering the 58 model, but I heard that they are susceptible to interference, but I don't know if that's a myth.
I was generally thinking about the 89XR, S, SA or 89XR, S, 89XR.
Will this be a universal set?
Can I get the Strat sound from position 2 (humbucker split with middle single coil) like in Whitesnake's "Is This Love"? With my JB and FS-1 in the middle, I can achieve that sound.
With JB, using a treble bleed cap only with a logarithmic potentiometer, I can clean the signal from high gain to clean.
I know that active ones don't need treble bleed, but I wonder if I'll be able to clean the tone as well as with passives?
Can I create an HSH setup (89xr S 89xr) with autosplit in positions 2 and 4, and manually on the switch or push-pull to create SSS? I've often done this with passives, but I have no experience with actives.
Best Regards.